Can a Parallel Importer Rebrand Pharmaceutical Products in the EU?

Aventis Pharma AB v. Paranova Läkemedel AB [2001], T-10375-99, E.T.M.R. 60.Search in Google Scholar

Avgoustis, I. (2012), ‘Parallel imports and exhaustion of trade mark rights: should steps be taken towards an international exhaustion regime?’ European Intellectual Property Review, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 108–121.Search in Google Scholar

Bird, R. C. & Chaudhry, P. E. (2010), ‘Repackaging, pharmaceuticals, and the European Union: managing gray markets in an uncertain legal environment,’ Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 719–756.Search in Google Scholar

Bjarnram, C. (2007), Parallel Trade in Pharmaceutical Products within the EEA: From First to Final Marketing—Balancing the Need to Protect and Promote Public Health and Safety with the EC Treaty Objective of Establishing a Common Market, PhD thesis, Durham: Durham University.Search in Google Scholar

Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Paranova A/S [1996], C-427/93, ECR I-3457.Search in Google Scholar

Calboli, I. (2002), ‘Trademark exhaustion in the European Union: community-wide or international? The saga continues,’ Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 47–90.Search in Google Scholar

Centrafarm BV v. American Home Products Corporation [1998], C-3/78, ECR 01823.Search in Google Scholar

Commission Communication 98/C 229/03 on the Community marketing authorization procedures for medicinal products,’ OJ 220/4, 22.7.98.Search in Google Scholar

Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2010), OJ, C 53, 1.61, 30.03.2010.Search in Google Scholar

Directive 2001/83 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, OJ, L 311, 28.11.2001.Search in Google Scholar

Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (Codified version) (Text with EEA relevance), OJ L 299, 8.11.2008.Search in Google Scholar

Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (Text with EEA relevance), OJ L 336, 23.12.2015.Search in Google Scholar

Dobrin, S. & Chochia, A. (2016), ‘The concepts of trademark exhaustion and parallel imports: a comparative analysis between the EU and the USA,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 28–57. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2016-001110.1515/bjes-2016-0011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dryden, D. & Middlemiss, S. (2003), ‘Parallel importation of repackaged goods: is “necessity” really necessary?’ Journal of Business Law, pp. 82–89.Search in Google Scholar

Fennelly, N. (2003), ‘Rules and exceptions: freedom of movement and intellectual property rights in the European Union,’ in H. C. Hansen (ed.) International Intellectual Property Law & Policy, vol. 5, ch. 33, New York: Juris Publishing LLC.Search in Google Scholar

First Council Directive 89/104/EEC to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks, OJ L 40, 21.12.1988.Search in Google Scholar

Forrester, I. & Nielson, A. (1997), ‘Pharmaceuticals: test bed for European themes on trademarks and the free movement of goods,’ Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, vol. 8, no. 13, pp. 11–37.Search in Google Scholar

Fuhrmeister, I. (2008), Das Umpacken von Arzneimitteln im Spannungsverhältnis zwischen Markenrecht und Warenverkehrsfreiheit, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH.Search in Google Scholar

Gilbert, P.; Wilson, A. & Waller, D. (2015), ‘Parallel imports—how useful is a trademark?’ International Law Office, 25 March 2015. Retrieved from http://www.powellgilbert.com/PowellGilbert/media/PG/2015-Parallel_imports_-_how_useful_is_a_trademark.pdf [accessed 1 Apr 2017]Search in Google Scholar

Gross, N.; Harrold, L. & Smith, H. (2002), ‘Fighting for pharmaceutical profits,’ European Intellectual Property Review, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 497–503.Search in Google Scholar

Hays, T. (2004), ‘Paranova v. Merck and co-branding of pharmaceuticals in the European Economic Area,’ The Trademark Reporter, vol. 94, no. 4, p. 821.Search in Google Scholar

INTA (2016), ‘UK—English Court of Appeal—Infringement—Defences—Under what conditions is it to be considered necessary for a parallel importer to resell imported product under the brand name used locally for the product in question, instead of the trademark under which the products were sold elsewhere in the EU?’ Annual Review of EU Trademark Law, The Trademark Reporter: The Law Journal of International Trademark Association, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 606–611.Search in Google Scholar

INTA (2017), Annual Review of EU Trademark Law: 2016 in Review in The Trademark Reporter: The Law Journal of the International Trade Association, vol. 107, no. 2.Search in Google Scholar

Klacid PRO [2008], Judgement of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH), I ZR 208/05.Search in Google Scholar

Malliaris, S. (2010), ‘Protecting famous trademarks: comparative analysis of US and EU diverging approaches—The battle between legislatures and the judiciary—Who is the ultimate judge,’ Chicago–Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 45–59.Search in Google Scholar

Norman, H. (2014), Intellectual Property Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199688104.001.000110.1093/he/9780199688104.001.0001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Opinion of A. G. Jacobs in joined Cases C-427, 429 and 436/93 Bristol-Meyers Squibb v. Paranova, [1995], p. 84.Search in Google Scholar

Orifarm A/S, Orifarm Supply A/S. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. [2014], 354/2011.Search in Google Scholar

Pfizer, Inc. v. Eurim-Pharm GmbH [1981], C-1/81, ECR 2913, 2927.Search in Google Scholar

Pharmacia & Upjohn SA v. Paranova A/S [1999], ECR C-379/97.Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, W.; Pratt, G. & Kelly, R. (2013), ‘Trademark law harmonization in the European Union: twenty years back and forth,’ Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 731–770.Search in Google Scholar

Roche AB v. Orifarm AB [2006], Ö-566-06, Swedish Supreme Court.Search in Google Scholar

Roche v. Paranova [2001], Ö-5632-01, National Swedish Court.Search in Google Scholar

Seville, C. (2016), EU Intellectual Property Law and Policy, 2nd ed., Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/978178100348010.4337/9781781003480Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Speciality European Pharma Ltd v. Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & another [2015], EWCA Civ. 54.Search in Google Scholar

Stretch, J. (2015), ‘Re-branding and parallel imports – free trade trumps trade mark rights?’ LexisNexis, 12 Feb 2015. Retrieved from https://blogs.lexisnexis.co.uk/wipit/re-branding-and-parallel-imports-free-trade-trumps-trade-mark-rights/ [accessed 1 Apr 2017]Search in Google Scholar

The Treaty Establishing the European Community, OJ, C 325 0033-0184, 24.12.2010.Search in Google Scholar

Zantag/Zantig [2002], Judgement of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH), I ZR 219/99.Search in Google Scholar