[Aroney, N. (2008), ‘Four reasons for an upper house. Representative democracy, public deliberation, legislative outputs and executive accountability,’ Adelaide Law Review, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 205-246.]Search in Google Scholar
[Avtonomov, A. S. (2013), ‘Istoki i smysl dvukhpalatnosti parlamentov [The origins and meaning of bicameral parliaments],’ Vìsnik Mariupol′s′kogo derzhavnogo universitetu, vol. 5, pp. 35-42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bean, C. S. & Wattenberg, M. P. (1998), ‘Attitudes towards divided government and ticket-splitting in Australia and the United States,’ Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1036114985070510.1080/10361149850705]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bentham, J. (1816), Tactiques de assemblée legislatives, suivi d’un traité des sophismes politiques, 2nd vol., translated by Dumont, Geneva & Paris: J. J. Paschaud.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bordenyuk, V. I. (2011), ‘Deiaki pytannia stvorennia dvopalatnoho parlamentuv Ukrayini u konteksti zarubizhnoho dosvidu [Some issues of creating a bicameral parliament in Ukraine in the context of foreign experience],’ Derzhava i Pravo, vol. 51, pp. 201-208.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bradbury, J. Ch. & Crain, W. M. (2001), ‘Legislative organization and government spending: cross-country evidence,’ Journal of Public Economics, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00150-X10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00150-X]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bradbury, J. Ch. & Crain, W. M. (2002), ‘Bicameral legislatures and fiscal policy,’ Southern Economic Journal, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 646-659. https://doi.org/10.2307/106172310.2307/1061723]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Brennan, G. & Hamlin, A. (1992), ‘Bicameralism and majoritarian equilibrium,’ Public Choice, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 169-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0014076510.1007/BF00140765]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Coakley, J. (2014), ‘The strange revival of bicameralism’, Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 542-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.92616810.1080/13572334.2014.926168]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Coakley, J. & Laver, M. (1996), ‘Options for the Future of Seanad Éireann,’ in The All-Party Oireachtas Committee on the Constitution, Second Progress Report, pp. 32-107. Retrieved from https://www.constitution.ie/Documents/Oireachtas%202nd-Report-Seanad%201997.pdf [accessed 9 Dec 2017] https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.92616810.1080/13572334.2014.926168]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Congleton, R. D. (2003), ‘On the merits of bicameral legislatures: policy predictability within partisan polities,’ Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie, vol. 22, pp. 29-49.]Search in Google Scholar
[Constitution of Ukraine (1996), Konstytutsiya Ukrayiny, Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny, 1996, 30, 141.]Search in Google Scholar
[Constitutional Assembly of Ukraine (2013), Pro proekt Kontseptsiyi vnesennia zmin do Konstytutsiyi Ukrayiny [On the concept of amending the Constitution of Ukraine]. Retrieved from http://jurliga.ligazakon.ua/news/2013/6/20/93050.htm [accessed 9 Dec 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[Dhami, S. & al-Nowaihi, A. (2007), ‘Optimal distribution of powers in a federation: a simple, unified framework,’ Bulletin of Economic Research, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 197-229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-3378.2007.00257.x10.1111/j.0307-3378.2007.00257.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Drexhage, B. (2015), Bicameral Legislatures: An International Comparison, The Hague: Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations, Directorate of Constitutional Affairs and Legislation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Druckman, J. N. & Thies, M. F. (2002), ‘The importance of concurrence: the impact of bicameralism on government formation and duration,’ American Journal of Political Science, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 760-771. https://doi.org/10.2307/308843210.2307/3088432]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Esmein, A. (1896), Éléments de droit constitutionnel, Paris: Librarie Larose. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Fisun O. A., ed. (2008), Dvopalatnyi parlament: svitovyi dosvid ta ukrayins′ki realiyi [Bicameral parliament: world experience and Ukrainian realities], Kharkiv: Zoloti Storinky.]Search in Google Scholar
[Forum of the World’s Senates (2000), Bicameralism around the World: Position and Prospects. Retrieved from http://www.senat.fr/senatsdumonde/forumdessenats/senats_secondeschambresmonde/english/english-synthese.html#fn1 [accessed 9 Dec 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[Ganghof, S. (2014), ‘Bicameralism as a form of government (or: why Australia and Japan do not have a parliamentary system),’ Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 647-665. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss08110.1093/pa/gss081]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gélard, P. (2006), ‘Parliamentary complexity or democratic necessity?’ Council of Europe, European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission) Report, 11.08.2006. Retrieved from http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL(2006)059-e [accessed 9 Dec 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[Goot, M. (1999), ‘Whose mandate? Policy promises, strong bicameralism and polled opinion,’ Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 327-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/1036114995026310.1080/10361149950263]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hammond, T. H. & Miller, G. J. (1987), ‘The core of the Constitution,’ American Political Science Review, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 1155-1174. https://doi.org/10.2307/196258310.2307/1962583]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Heller, W. B. (1997), ‘Bicameralism and budget deficits: the effect of parliamentary structure on government spending,’ Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 485-516. https://doi.org/10.2307/44034010.2307/440340]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Heller, W. B. (2001), ‘Political denials: the policy effect of intercameral partisan differences in bicameral parliamentary systems,’ Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 34-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/17.1.3410.1093/jleo/17.1.34]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Herman, V. & Mendel, F. (1976), Parliaments of the World: A Reference Compendium, London: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1515/978311169105310.1515/9783111691053]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hickey, R. (2013), ‘Bicameral bargaining and federation formation,’ Public Choice, vol. 154, nos. 3-4, pp. 217-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9815-x 10.1007/s11127-011-9815-x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Holovaty S. P., ed. (1997), Konstytutsiia nezalezhnoyi Ukrayiny [The Constitution of the independent Ukraine], vol. 1, Kyiv: Ukrainian Legal Foundation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Inter-Parliamentary Union (1962), Parliaments: A Comparative Study on the Structure and Functioning of Representative Institutions in Forty-One Countries, London: Cassell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Inter-Parliamentary Union (1986), Parliaments of the World: A Comparative Reference Compendium, vol. 2, New York: Facts on File Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Joyal, S. (2003), Protecting Canadian Democracy: The Senate You Never Knew, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.10.1515/9780773571341]Search in Google Scholar
[Kerikmäe, T. (2016), ‘Estonia as an EU Member State: Lack of pro-active constitutional dialogue,’ in A. H. Morawa (ed.) Constitutional Evolution in Central and Eastern Europe: Expansion and Integration in the EU, Routledge, pp. 11-41.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kerikmäe, T. & Chochia, A., eds. (2016), Political and Legal Perspectives of the EU Eastern Partnership Policy, Cham, Heidelberg & New York: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27383-910.1007/978-3-319-27383-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lijphart, A. (1984), Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries, New Haven: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1ww3w2t10.2307/j.ctt1ww3w2t]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lijphart, A. (1999), Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven: Yale University Press. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Luther, J.; Passaglia, P. & Tarchi, R. (2006), A World of Second Chambers. Handbook for Constitutional Studies on Bicameralism, Milan: Giuffre.]Search in Google Scholar
[Manning, H. & Loomis, B. A. A. (2014), ‘Bicameralism, Representation and Governance: An Australian-American Comparison,’ Paper presented at Australian Political Studies Association Conference University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 28 September - 1 October 2014. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.250073010.2139/ssrn.2500730]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Massicotte, L. (2001), ‘Legislative unicameralism: a global survey and a few case studies,’ Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 151-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/71400386510.1080/714003865]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mastlas, J. & Grange, L., eds. (1987), Les secondes chambres du parlement en Europe occidentale, Paris: Economica.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mughan, A. & Patterson, S. Ch. (1999), ‘Senates: A Comparative Perspective,’ in S. Ch. Patterson & A. Mughan (eds.) Senates: Bicameralism in the Contemporary World, Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[One Text Initiative Research & Development (2011), An Introduction to Bicameral Legislature: Theory and Practice. Retrieved from http://www.onetext.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/03/02_May-2011.pdf [accessed 9 Dec 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[Prelot, M. (1955), Precis de droit constitutionnel, 3rd ed., Paris: Librarie Dalloz. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Riker, W. H. (1992), ‘The justification of bicameralism,’ International Political Science Review, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 101-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121920130010710.1177/019251219201300107]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Russell, M. (2000), Reforming the House of Lords: Lessons from Overseas, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298311.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298311.001.0001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Russell, M. (2001), ‘What are second chambers for?’ Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 54, pp. 442-458. https://doi.org/10.1093/parlij/54.3.44210.1093/parlij/54.3.442]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Schmitt, P. (2014), ‘Comparative Overview of Consultative Practices within the Second Chambers of EU National Legislatures,’ European Committee of the Regions. Retrieved from http://cor.europa.eu/en/documentation/studies/Documents/comparative-overview-of-consultative-practices-within-the-second-chambers-ofeu-national-legislatures.pdf [accessed 9 Dec 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[Senates and Representation of Local Authorities (2001), [Home page]. Retrieved from http://www.senateurope.org/eng/06062001.html [accessed 9 Dec 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[Slovska, I. Ye. (2013), Konstytutsiyno-pravovyi status parlamentu - Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny [Constitutional and legal status of parliament], Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, D. E. (2003), The Canadian Senate in Bicameral Perspective, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/978144268060910.3138/9781442680609]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Svyatotsky, A. & Chushenko, B. (1998), ‘Pytannia teoriyi i praktyky konstytutsionalizmu v Ukrayini’ [Problems in the theory and practice of constitutionalism in Ukraine], Pravo Ukrayiny, vol. 2, pp. 17-20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsebelis, G. & Money, J. (1997), Bicameralism, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609350]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsebelis, G. & Rash, B. E. (1995), ‘Patterns of bicameralism,’ in H. Döring (ed.) Parliaments in Western Europe: Majority Rule and Minority Rights, New York: St. Martin Press, pp. 365-390.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsybulenko, E. & Pakhomenko, S. (2016), ‘The Ukrainian crisis as a challenge for the Eastern Partnership,’ in T. Kerikmäe & A. Chochia (eds.) Political and Legal erspectives of the EU Eastern Partnership Policy, Cham: Springer, pp. 167-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27383-9_1110.1007/978-3-319-27383-9_11]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Uhr, J. (1999), ‘Generating divided government: the Australian Senate,’ in S. Ch. Patterson & A. Mughan (eds.) Senates: Bicameralism in the Contemporary World, Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, pp. 93-119.]Search in Google Scholar
[Waldron, J. (2012), ‘Bicameralism’: Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Working Paper 12-19, New York: New York University School of Law.]Search in Google Scholar
[Warwick, P. (1992), ‘Ideological diversity and governmental survival in Western European parliamentary democracies,’ Comparative Political Studies, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 332-361. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041409202500300310.1177/0010414092025003003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Warwick, P. (1994), Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511528132]Search in Google Scholar
[Wasowicz, М. (1992), ‘Les changements des attributions de la chambre haute des parlements en Europe au XIXe siècle et au début du XXe siècle,’ in H. Blom, W. Blockmans & H. de Schepper (eds.) Bicameralisme, Tweekamerstelsel vroeger en nu - Handelingen van de Internationale Conferentie ter gelegenheid van het 175-jarig bestaan van de Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal in de Nederlanden, Den Haag, pp. 131-138.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhuravskiy, V. (2001), Ukrayins′kyi parlamentaryzm na suchasnomu etapi. Teoretykopravovyi aspect [Ukrainian parliamentarism on the modern stage. Theoretical and legal aspects], Kyiv: Instytut derzhavy i prava im. V. M. Korets′koho NAN Ukrayiny.]Search in Google Scholar