Male and female reproductive success in natural and anthropogenic populations of Malaxis monophyllos (L.) Sw. (Orchidaceae)

Aguilar R., Ashworth L., Galetto L. & Aizen M. A. 2006. Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol. Letters 9: 968-980.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00927.x16913941Search in Google Scholar

Aragón S. & Ackerman J. D. 2001. Density effects on the reproductive success and herbivory of Malaxis massonii. Lindleyana 16: 3-12.Search in Google Scholar

Argue C. L. 2012. Tribe Malaxideae. In: The Pollination Biology of North American orchids, vol. 2, pp. 91-104. Springer, New York.10.1007/978-1-4614-0622-8_5Search in Google Scholar

Ashman T., Knight T. M., Steets J. A., Amarasekare P., Burd M., Campbell D. R., Dudash M. R., Johnston M. O., Mazer S. J., Mitchell R. J., Morgan M. T. & Wilson W. G. 2004. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85: 2408-2421.10.1890/03-8024Search in Google Scholar

Bernacki L. 2014. NT Malaxis monophyllos (L.) Sw. Wyblin jednolistny. In: R. Kaźmierczakowa, K. Zarzycki & Z. Mirek (eds.). Polska czerwona księga roślin. Paprotniki i rośliny kwiatowe, wyd. 3, pp. 795-797. PAN, Instytut Ochrony Przyrody, Kraków.Search in Google Scholar

Bernacki L. & Błońska A. 2006. Występowanie storczykowatych (Orchidaceae) w otoczeniu południowego odcinka drogi Krośnica-Niedzica w Pienińskim Parku Narodowym. Pieniny - Przyroda i Człowiek 9: 65-70.Search in Google Scholar

Błońska A. 2010. Siedliska antropogeniczne na Wyżynie Śląskiej jako miejsca występowania rzadkich i zagrożonych gatunków torfowiskowych klasy Scheuchzerio-Caricetea nigrae (Nordh. 1937) R. Tx 1937. Wody-Środowisko-Obszary Wiejskie 1: 7-19.Search in Google Scholar

Bosch M. & Waser N. M. 2001. Experimental manipulation of plant density and its effects on pollination and reproduction of two confamilial montane herbs. Oecologia 126: 76-83.10.1007/s00442000048828547440Search in Google Scholar

Brody A. K. & Mitchell R. J. 1997. Effects of experimental manipulation of inflorescence size on pollination and pre-dispersal seed predation in the hummingbirdpollinated plant Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 110: 86-93.10.1007/s00442005013628307472Search in Google Scholar

Brys R., Jacquemyn H. & Hermy M. 2008. Pollination efficiencyand reproductive patterns in relation to localplant density, population size, and floral display in the rewarding Listera ovata (Orchidaceae). Bot. J. Lin. Soc. 157: 713-721.Search in Google Scholar

Brzosko E. 2002a. Dynamics of island populations of Cypripedium calceolus in the Biebrza river valley (NE Poland). Bot. J. Lin. Soc. 139: 67-77.10.1046/j.1095-8339.2002.00049.xSearch in Google Scholar

Brzosko E. 2002b. The dynamic of Listera ovata populations on mineral islands in the Biebrza National Park. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 71: 243-251.10.5586/asbp.2002.029Search in Google Scholar

Brzosko E. 2003. The dynamics of island populations of Platanthera bifolia in the Biebrza National Park (NE Poland). Ann. Bot. Fenn. 40: 243-253.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron K. M. 2005. Leave it to the leaves: a molecular phylogenetic study of Malaxideae (Epidendroideae, Orchidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 92: 1025-1032.10.3732/ajb.92.6.102521652487Search in Google Scholar

Claessens J. & Kleynen J. 2011. The Flower of the European Orchid. Form and Function. 137-144 pp. Schrijen- Lippertz, Netherland.Search in Google Scholar

Czylok A., Rahmonov O. & Szymczyk A. 2008. Biological diversity in the area of quarries after sand exploitation in the eastern part of Silesian Upland. Teka Kom. Ochr. Kształ. Środ. Przyr. - OL PAN, 5A: 15-22.Search in Google Scholar

Czylok A. & Szymczyk A. 2009. Sand quarries as biotopes of rare and critically endangered plant species. In: Z. Mirek & A. Nikiel (eds.). Rare, relict and endangered plants and fungi in Poland, pp. 187-192. W.v Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków.Search in Google Scholar

Esfeld K., Hensen I., Wesche K., Jakob S. S., Tischew S. & Blatter F. R. 2008. Molecular data indicate multiple independent colonization of former lignite mining areas in Eastern Germany by Epipactis palustris (Orchidaceae). Biodivers. Conserv. 17: 2441-2453.10.1007/s10531-008-9391-7Search in Google Scholar

Firmage D. H. & Cole F. R. 1988. Reproductive success and inflorescence size of Calopogon tuberosus (Orchidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 75: 1371-1377.10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb14198.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gajewski Z. 2010. Zjawisko apofityzmu wśród storczyków południowej Polski. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk. Roln. 551: 65-71.Search in Google Scholar

Jacquemyn H., Brys R., Honnay O. & Hermy M. 2008. Effects of coppicing on demographic structure, fruit and seed set in Orchis mascula. Basic Appl. Ecol. 9: 392-400.Search in Google Scholar

Jakubska A., Malicka M. & Malicki M. 2006. New data on the apophytic occurrence of Epipactis helleborine (L.) Crantz and Cephalanthera longifolia (L.) Fritsch in Populus ×canadensis plantation in Lower Silesia (south-western Poland). Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 1-2: 95-97.Search in Google Scholar

Jermakowicz E. & Brzosko E. 2011. Zróżnicowanie właściwości populacji Malaxis monophyllos w różnych regionach Polski. In: E. Brzosko, A. Wróblewska & E. Jermakowicz (eds.). Storczykowate w Polsce. Biologia i ochrona, pp. 40-51. Alter Studio, Białystok.Search in Google Scholar

Jersáková J., Johnson S. D. & Kindlmann P. 2006. Mechanisms and evolution of deceptive pollination in orchids. Biol. Rev. 81: 219-235.10.1017/S1464793105006986Search in Google Scholar

Johnson S. D., Neal P. R., & Harder L. D. 2005. Pollen fates and the limits on male reproductive success in an orchid population. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 86: 175-190.10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00541.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lundholm J. T. & Richardson P. J. 2010. Habitat analogues for recolonization ecology in urban and industrial environments. J. Appl. Ecol. 47: 966-975.10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01857.xSearch in Google Scholar

Mitchell R. J., Karron J. D., Holmquist K. G. & Bell J. M. 2004. The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns. Functional Ecol. 18: 116-124.10.1111/j.1365-2435.2004.00812.xSearch in Google Scholar

Neiland M. R. M. & Wilcock C. C. 1998. Fruit set, nectar reward and rarity in the Orchidaceae. Am. J. Bot. 85: 1657-1671.Search in Google Scholar

Nowak T., Kapusta P., Jędrzej czyk-Korycińska M., SzarekŁukaszewska G. & Godzik B. 2011. The vascular plants of the Olkusz Ore-bearing Region. 227 pp. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków.Search in Google Scholar

Nowak A. & Nowak S. 2006. Anthropogenic habitats can shelter threatened plants. Environ. Sci. Eng. 3:107-115.10.1007/978-3-540-47229-2_12Search in Google Scholar

O’Connell L. M. & Johnston M. O. 1998. Male and female pollination success in a deceptive orchid, a selection study. Ecology 79: 1246-1260.Search in Google Scholar

Ohashi K. & Yahara T. 1998. Effects of variation in flower number on pollinators visits in Cirsium purpuratum (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 85: 219-224.10.2307/2446309Search in Google Scholar

Parra-Tabla, V., Vargas C. F., Mangan˜a-Rueda S. & Navarro J. 2000. Female and male pollination success of Oncidium ascendens Lindley (Orchidaceae) in two contrasting habitat patches: forest v/s agricultural field. Biol. Conserv. 94: 335-340.10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00187-1Search in Google Scholar

Pellegrino G. & Bellusci F. 2014. Effects of human disturbance on reproductive success and population viability of Serapis cordigera (Orchidaceae). Bot. J. Lin. Soc. 176: 408-420.10.1111/boj.12204Search in Google Scholar

Rindal E., Søli G. E. E. & Bachmann L. 2009. Molecular phylogeny of the fungus gnat family Mycetophilidae (Diptera, Mycetophiliformia). Syst. Entomol. 34: 524-532.10.1111/j.1365-3113.2009.00474.xSearch in Google Scholar

Sabat A. M. & Ackeramn J. D. 1996. Fruit set in a deceptive orchid: The effect of flowering phenology, display size, and local floral abundance. Am. J. Bot. 83: 1181-1186.Search in Google Scholar

Schefferson R. P, Kull T. & Tali K. 2008. Mycorrhizal interactions of orchids colonizing Estonian mine tailing hills. Am. J. Bot. 95: 156-164.10.3732/ajb.95.2.15621632341Search in Google Scholar

Scheffknecht S., Winkler M., Hülber K., Rosas M. M. & Hietz P. 2010. Seedling establishment of epiphytic orchids in forests and coffee plantations in Central Veracruz, Mexico. J. Trop. Ecol. 26: 93-102.10.1017/S0266467409990332Search in Google Scholar

STATISTICA StatSoft Inc. 2011. STATISTICA User’s Guide, Version 10 Fulsa (eds. StatSoft Polska) StatSoft Inc., Kraków.Search in Google Scholar

Sun H., Alexandersson R. & Ge S. 2010. Positive effects of flower abundance and synchronous flowering on pollination success, and pollinia dispersal in rewardless Changnienia amoena (Orchidaceae). Biol. J. Lin. Soc. 99: 477-488.Search in Google Scholar

Tremblay R. L., Ackerman J. D., Zimmerman J. K. & Calvo R. N. 2005. Variation in sexual reproduction in orchids and its evolutionary consequences: a spasmodic journey to diversification. Biol. J. Lin. Soc. 84: 1-54.10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00400.xSearch in Google Scholar

Tuomi J., Lämsä J., Wannas L., Abeli T. & Jäkäläniemi A. 2015. Pollinator behaviour on a food-deceptive orchid Calypso bulbosa and coflowering species. The Scientific World Journal: http:/dx.doi. org/10.1155/2015/482161.10.1155/2015/482161437751225861675Search in Google Scholar

Wójcik A. J. & Chmura J. 2005. Złoża surowców mineralnych i zmiany środowiska naturalnego wywołane przez górnictwo na terenie Bukowna. Górnictwo i Geoinżynieria 29(4): 219-236.Search in Google Scholar

Vakhrameeva M. G., Tatarenko I. V., Varlygina T. I., Torosyan G. K. & Zagulskii M. N. 2008. Orchids of Russia and adjacent countries (within the borders of the former USSR). 417-420 pp. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag, Ruggell/Liechtenstein.Search in Google Scholar

Vöth W. 1999. Lebensgeschichte und Bestauber der Orchideen am Beispiel von Niederosterreich. Stapfia 65: 1-25.Search in Google Scholar

Zimmerman J. K., Roubik D. W. & Ackerman J. D. 1989. Asynchronous phenologies of a neotropical orchid and its euglossine bee pollinators. Ecology 70: 67-73. 10.2307/1941389Search in Google Scholar