[BENDER, C. M. – ORSZAG, S. A. 1978. Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. New York : Mc Graw Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[CAI, J. M. – FANG, H. – FUSHENG, Y. 2006. Nonisothermal nth-order DAEM equation and its parametric study – Use in the kinetic analysis of biomass pyrolysis. In Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 949–956.]Search in Google Scholar
[CAI, J. M. – LIU, R. H. 2007. Parametric study of the nonisothermal nth order distributed activation energy model involved the Weibull distribution for biomass pyrolysis. In Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 971–975.]Search in Google Scholar
[DHAUNDIYAL, A. – SINGH, S. B. 2016a. Distributed activation energy modelling for pyrolysis of forest waste using Gaussian distribution. In Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, Applied Sciences, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 64–70.]Search in Google Scholar
[DHAUNDIYAL, A. – SINGH, S. B. 2016b. Asymptotic approximations to the distributed activation energy model for non isothermal pyrolysis of loose biomass using the Weibull distribution. In Archivum Combustionis, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 131–146.]Search in Google Scholar
[DHAUNDIYAL, A – SINGH, S. B. 2017. Parametric study of nth order distributed activation energy model for isothermal pyrolysis of forest waste using Gaussian distribution. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 23–28.]Search in Google Scholar
[DHAUNDIYAL, A. – TEWARI, P. C. 2017. Kinetic parameters for the thermal decomposition of forest waste using distributed activation energy model (DAEM). In Environmental and Climate Technologies, vol. 19, pp. 15–32.]Search in Google Scholar
[DONSKOI, E. – MCELWAIN, D. L. S. 1999. Approximate modelling of coal pyrolysis. In Fuel, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 825–835.10.1016/S0016-2361(98)00204-X]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[HOWARD, J. B. 1981. Chapter 12. Fundamentals of coal pyrolysis and hydropyrolysis. In Chemistry of Coal Utilization. New York : John Wiley and Sons, pp. 665–784. ISBN 0471077267.]Search in Google Scholar
[LAKSHMANAN, C. C. – WHITE, N. 1994. A new distributed activation energy model using Weibull distribution for the representation of complex kinetics. In Energy & Fuels, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1158–1167.10.1021/ef00048a001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[NIKSA, S. – LAU, C. W. 1993. Global rates of devolatilization for various coal types. In Combustion abd Flame, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 293–307.]Search in Google Scholar
[PITT, G. J. 1962. The kinetics of the evolution of volatile products from coal. In Fuel, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 267–274.]Search in Google Scholar
[SUUBERG, E. M. 1983. Approximate solution technique for nonisothermal, Gaussian distributed activation energy models. In Combustion and Flame, vol. 50, pp. 243–245.10.1016/0010-2180(83)90066-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[TENG, H. – HSIEH, C. T. 1999. Influence of surface characteristics on liquid-phase adsorption of phenol by activated carbons prepared from bituminous coal. In Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 3618–3624.]Search in Google Scholar
[VAND, A. 1943. Theory of the irreversible electrical resistance changes of metallic films evaporated in vacuum. In Proceedings of Physics Society of London A, vol. 55, pp. 222–246.]Search in Google Scholar