[BRAUN-BLANQUET, J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. 3. Aufl. Springer Verlag, Wien.10.1007/978-3-7091-8110-2]Search in Google Scholar
[CARDINALE, B. J. – SRIVASTAVA, D.S. – DUFFY, J.E. – WRIGHT, J.P. – DOWNING, A.L. – SANKARAN, M. – JOUSEAU, C. 2006. Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. In Nature, vol. 443, 2006, no. 7114, pp. 989–992. ISSN 0028-0836.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAPIN, F.S. – BRET-HARTE, M.S. – HOBBIE, S.E. – HAILAN, Z. 1996. Plant functional types as predictors of transient responses of arctic vegetation to global change. In J. Vegetation Sci., vol. 7, 1996, pp 347–358.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAPIN, F.S. – ZAVALETA, E.S. – EVINER, V.T. – NAYLOR, R.L. – VITOUSEK, P.M. – REYNOLDS, H.L. – HOOPER, D.U. – LAVOREL, S. – SALA, O.E. – HOBBIE, S.E. – MACK, M.C. – DÍAZ, S. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. In Nature, vol. 405, 2000, pp 234–242.]Search in Google Scholar
[DYKYJOVÁ, D. et al. 1989. Metody studia ekosystémů. Praha : Academia, 1989. p. 690.]Search in Google Scholar
[ELIÁŠ, P. 1983. Ecological and Social Functions of Vegetation. In Ekológia (ČSSR), vol. 2, 1983, no. 1, pp. 93–104.]Search in Google Scholar
[ELIÁŠ, P. 1987. Vegetácia severovýchodnej časti Tríbeča (skupina Sokolca). In Rosalia (Nitra), vol. 4, 1987, pp 143–171.]Search in Google Scholar
[ELIÁŠ, P. 1997. Funkčné skupiny rastlín vo fytocenózach. Bratislava : SEKOS pri SAV, 1997, p. 152. ISBN 80-967596-9-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[ELIÁŠ, P. 2010. Ekosystémové služby a kvalita života ľudí vo vidieckych oblastiach. In Životné prostredie, vol. 44, 2010, no. 2, 88–91 pp. ISSN 0044-4863.]Search in Google Scholar
[ELIÁŠ, P. 2014. Identifikácia ekosystémových služieb vo vidieckej krajine. In Venkovská krajina 2014. České Budějovice : Česká společnost pro ekologii, 2014, pp. 20–27. ISBN 978-80-7458-056-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[ELIAŠ, P. 2015. Deductive and inductive approaches to identifying, mapping and valuation of ecosystem services in rural landscape. In EEF Congress Ecology at the interface: science based solutions for humman well-being. Abstract Book, Rome, p. 474.]Search in Google Scholar
[HILL, M. O. 1973. Diversity and Eveness: a unifying notation and its consequences. In Ecology, vol. 54. 1973, no. 2, pp. 427–432.]Search in Google Scholar
[JAŠKOVÁ, V. 2008. Imaptiens noli-tangere. In Botany.cz [online] [Retrieved from. 2016-04-14]. Available at: http://botany.cz/cs/impatiens-noli-tangere/]Search in Google Scholar
[JURKO, A. 1990. Ecological and socio-economic evaluation of vegetation. Bratislava : Príroda, 1990. ISBN 80-07-00391-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[KARPÁTI, V. – KARPÁTI, I. – JURKO, A. 1963. Bachbegleitende Erlenauen im eukarpatischen un pannonischen Mittelgebirge. In Biologia, vol. 18, 1963, pp. 97–120.]Search in Google Scholar
[KOLLÁR, J. – KUBÍČEK, F. – ŠIMONOVIČ, V. – KANKA, R. – BALKOVIČ, J. 2010. Production-ecological analysis of the broad-leaved forest ecosystems herb layer biomass in Žalostínska vrchovina upland and Zámčisko (western Slovakia). In Ekológia, vol. 29, 2010 no. 2, pp113–122.]Search in Google Scholar
[KOTRLA, M. 2007. Významnosť vegetácie mäkkých lužných lesov z pohľadu ich socio-ekonomických funkcií v alúviu Váhu. In Acta regionalia et environmentalica, vol. 1, 2007, pp. 13–16.]Search in Google Scholar
[KUBÍČEK F. – JURKO, A. 1975. Estimation of the above-ground biomass of the herb layer in forest communities. In Folia geobotanica et phytotaxonomica, Praha, vol. 10, 1975, no. 1, pp. 113–129.]Search in Google Scholar
[LOREAU, M. – NAEEM, S. – INCHAUSTI, P. – J. BENGTSSON, J. – GRIME, J. P. – HECTOR, A. – HOOPER, D. U. – HUSTON, M. A. – RAFFAELLI, D. – SCHMID, B. – TILMAN, D. – WARDLE, D. A. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. In Science, vol. 294, 2001, pp. 804–808.]Search in Google Scholar
[MARHOLD, K. – HINDÁK, F. (eds). 1998. Zoznam nižších a vyšších rastlín Slovenska. Bratislava : Veda, 1998. pp. 333–687.]Search in Google Scholar
[MILLENIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington D. C. : Island Press, 2005. pp. 528–546.]Search in Google Scholar
[SECRETARIAT OF THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. 2010. Global biodiversity: Outlook 3. Malta: Progress Press Ltd, p. 94. ISBN-92-9225-220-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[STANOVÁ, V. – VALACHOVIČ, M. (eds.) 2002. Katalóg Biotopov Slovenska. Bratislava : DAPHNE – Inštitút aplikovanej ekológie, 2002. 225 s.]Search in Google Scholar
[STEFFEN, W. – SANDERSON, A. – TYSON, P. D. – JÄGER, J. – MATSON, P. A. – MOORE III, B. – OLDFIELD, F. – RICHARDSON, K. – SCHELLNHUBER, H. J. – TURNER II, B. L. – WASSON, R. J. 2004. Global change and the earth system: A planet under pressure. Berlin : Springer, 2004. p. 40. ISBN 91-631-5380-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[ŠOMŠÁK, L. 1961. Jelšové porasty Spišsko-gemerského rudohoria. In Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comen., Bot., vol. 6. 1961, pp. 407–459.]Search in Google Scholar
[TILMAN, D. 2000. Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity. In Nature. vol. 405, 2000, pp. 208–211.]Search in Google Scholar
[TILMAN, D. 2001. Functional diversity. In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (ed. Levin, S.A.). San Diego, CA : Academic Press, 2001. pp. 109–120.]Search in Google Scholar
[TÓTHOVÁ, A. – HALADA, Ľ. 2015. Ecological evaluation of grassland in the Hodrušská Hornatina highlands (the 1st results). In 17th International Symposium. Book of abstract.]Search in Google Scholar
[VELLEND, M. – GEBER, M. A. 2005. Connections between species diversity and genetic diversity. In Ecology Letters, vol. 8, 2005, pp. 767–781.]Search in Google Scholar
[WEISS, M. 1967. Vegetačné pomery alúvia potoka Hlboká. Diploma thesis. Bratislava : Comenius University, 1967. p. 135.]Search in Google Scholar