[Adamczyk K., Górecka - Bruzda A., Nowicki J., Gumułka M., Molik E., Schwarz T., Earley B., Klocek C. (2015). Perception of environment in farm animals -areview. Ann. Anim. Sci., 15: 565-589.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bruckmaier R.M., Blum J.W. (1996). Simultaneous recording of oxytocin release, milk ejection and milk flow during milking of dairy cows with and without prestimulation. J. Dairy Res., 63: 201-208.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gygax L., Neuffer I., Kaufmann C., Hauser R., Wechsler B. (2008). Restlessness behaviour, heart rate and heart-rate variability of dairy cows milked in two types of automatic milking systems and auto-tandem milking parlours. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 109: 167-179.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hagen K., Lexer D., Palme R., Troxler J., Waiblinger S. (2004). Milking of Brown Swiss and Austrian Simmental cows inaherringbone parlour or an automatic milking unit. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 88: 209-225.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamann J. (2001). On the influence of housing systems on udder health and milk quality (Zum Einfluss von Haltungssystemen auf Eutergesundheit und Milchqualität). Rinderproduktion, 43: 52-54.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamann J. (2005). Diagnosis of mastitis and indicators of milk quality. In: Mastitis in dairy production: Current knowledge and future solutions, Hogeveen H. (ed.). Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp. 82-90.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hemsworth P.H., Barnett J.L., Tilbrook A.J., Hansen C. (1989). The effects of handling by humans at calving and during milking on the behaviour and milk cortisol concentrations of primiparous dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 22: 313-326.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hermans G.G.N., Ipema A.H., Stefanowska J., Metz J.H.M. (2003). The effect of two traffic situations on the behavior and performance of cows in an automatic milking system. J. Dairy Sci., 86: 1997-2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hopster H., Bruckmaier R.M., Van der Werf J.T.N., Korte S.M., Macuhova J., Korte - Bouws G.,van Reenen C.G. (2002). Stress responses during milking; Comparing conventional and automatic milking in primiparous dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 85: 3206-3216.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hötzel M.J., Filho L.C.P.M., Yunes M.C.,da Silveira M.C.A.C. (2005). An aversive milker causes fear, but does not influence milk yield of Holstein cows. Rev. Bras. Zootecn., 34: 1278-1284.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jakob M., Liebers F. (2011). Potential ofaquarter individual milking system to reduce the workload in large-herd dairy operations. J. Agromedicine, 16: 280-291.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kanswohl N., Schlegel M., Polanco G., Rossel D. (2007). Effect of different time of premilking teat preparation on milking characteristics of dairy cows in Cuba. Arch. Tierz.-Arch. Anim. Breed., 50: 337-347.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ketelaar - de Lauwere C.C., Hendriks M., Metz J.H.M., Schouten W.G.P. (1998). Behaviour of dairy cows under free or forced cow traffic inasimulated automatic milking system environment. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 56: 13-28.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kutzer T., Steilen M., Gygax L., Wechsler B. (2015). Habituation of dairy heifers to milking routine - Effects on human avoidance distance, behavior, and cardiac activity during milking. J. Dairy Sci., 98: 5241-5251.]Search in Google Scholar
[Müller A.B., Rose - Meierhöfer S., Ammon C., Brunsch R. (2011). Comparison of the effects of quarter-individual and conventional milking systems on milkability traits. Arch. Tierz.- Arch. Anim. Breed., 54: 360-373.]Search in Google Scholar
[Müller A.B., Rose - Meierhöfer S., Ammon C., Brunsch R. (2013). The effects of quarter- individual milking in conventional milking parlours on the somatic cell count and udder health of dairy cows. J. Dairy Res., 80: 36-44.]Search in Google Scholar
[Munksgaard L., De Passillé A.M., Rushen J., Herskin M.S., Kristensen A.M. (2001). Dairy cows’ fear of people: social learning, milk yield and behaviour at milking. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 73: 15-26.]Search in Google Scholar
[Öz H., Rose - Meierhöfer S., Ströbel U., Ammon C. (2010). Comparison of the vacuum dynamics of conventional and quarter individual milking systems. Tarim Bilim. Derg., 16: 162-168.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rose - Meierhöfer S., Brunsch R., Jakob M. (2009). Reduction of forces on the teats by single tube guiding in conventional milking parlours. South Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 39: 161-164.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rose - Meierhöfer S., Hoffmann G., Öz H., Ströbel U., Ammon C. (2010). Milkingtime tests in conventional and quarter-individual milking systems. Landbauforschung, 60: 11-15.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rushen J., Munksgaard L., Marnet P.G., De Passillé A.M. (2001). Human contact and the effects of acute stress on cows at milking. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 73: 1-14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szentléleki A., Nagy K., Széplaki K., Kékesi K., Tőzsér J. (2015). Behavioural responses of primiparous and multiparous dry cows to the milking process over an entire lactation. Ann. Anim. Sci., 15: 185-195.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tančin V., Uhrinčat M., Mačuhová L., Bruckmaier R.M. (2007). Effect of pre-stimulation on milk flow pattern and distribution of milk constituents ataquarter level. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 52: 117-121.]Search in Google Scholar
[Waiblinger S., Menke C., F ölsch D.W. (2003). Influences on the avoidance and approach behaviour of dairy cows towards humans on 35 farms. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 84: 23-39. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Wenzel C., Schönreiter - Fischer S., Unshelm J. (2003). Studies on step-kick behavior and stress of cows during milking in an automatic milking system. Livest. Prod. Sci., 83: 237-246. ]Search in Google Scholar
