<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

This study shows that the temporal interpretation of Mandarin bare clauses is fully underspecified when these clauses describe scheduled, preprogrammed events. The paper defines the key syntactic properties of such bare clauses and their context of use. On the basis of this definition, the paper proposes that these clauses are copular constructions, which in all relevant respects behave like regular copular constructions. Bare clauses contain a subject and a predicate, related by the (sometimes covert) copula <italic>shì</italic>, expressing a paired relation between them. The fact that bare clauses have a simple predicative structure underlyingly is further supported by observations from the realm of gapping and negation. Crucially, it is proposed that there is no temporal projection immediately above the verb phrase in these sentences. The underspecification of the temporal interpretation is accordingly accounted for.
</abstract>

Temporally Underspecified Bare Clauses in Mandarin

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

I investigate the Intervention Effect in Late Archaic Chinese (LAC) and modern Mandarin. In LAC, negation displays the Intervention Effect on <italic>wh</italic>-phrases. There are two types of <italic>wh</italic>-items that are subject to the Intervention Effect triggered by negation, namely, <italic>wh</italic>-arguments and <italic>wh</italic>-adverbials that are supposed to move to a lower focus position below the negation; and those that have the option to stay in situ. Due to the intervening negative barrier, these c-commanded <italic>wh</italic>-phrases have to rise to a higher focus position above the negation so as to circumvent the Intervention Effect. I propose that the Intervention Effect in LAC is a consequence of Q-binding as a feature movement of [<italic>wh</italic>], interacting with movement into the hierarchy of clause-internal positions driven by [Topic] or [Focus] features. By contrast, focus or quantificational phrases do not display the Intervention Effect in LAC. In modern Mandarin, focus phrases, but not negation or quantified structures, impose the Intervention Effect on <italic>wh</italic>-items; negation, but not focus phrases or quantified structures, imposes the Intervention Effect on temporal <italic>wh</italic>-adverbials. I also propound three obligatory requirements for the Intervention Effect to take place in LAC, namely, interrogativity of <italic>wh</italic>-items, the possibility of feature <italic>wh</italic>-movement, and a hierarchy of clausal positions. Although the Intervention Effect in LAC and modern Mandarin are triggered by different barriers, it always needs to meet the three requirements. Data from both LAC and Mandarin justify previous analyses regarding feature movement.
</abstract>

The Intervention Effect in Late Archaic Chinese and Modern Mandarin

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

This paper seeks to examine nine slang words created newly in Cantonese, which started their life journey from the inventions of individuals and now constituting the established lexical means of expressing cultural conceptualizations. These slang expressions are analyzed with reference to the theory of conceptual integration (also known as “blending”) developed in Fauconnier and Turner 2002. In the analysis, four different types of conceptual integration network (i.e., simplex networks, single-scope networks, double-scope, and multiple-scope networks) are used to unravel the increasingly complex systems of cognitive operations with which the “slang” blends are created. During the discussion of the conceptual integration networks here, we were able to see how elements and relations from familiar conceptualizations can be transformed into new and meaningful ones that align along with the changes in cultural conceptualizations. It is hoped that this study shows that, despite having wide applications in the English language, the blending theory can provide an integrated and coherent account of the cognitive mechanisms by which colloquial words are constructed and construed in terms of cultural experiences specific to a given non-Anglo locality.
</abstract>

Conceptual Blending and Slang Expressions in Hong Kong Cantonese

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 44 (2023): Issue 1 (June 2023)

Volume 43 (2022): Issue 2 (December 2022)

Volume 43 (2022): Issue 1 (June 2022)

Volume 42 (2021): Issue 2 (December 2021)

Volume 42 (2021): Issue 1 (June 2021)

Volume 41 (2020): Issue 2 (December 2020)

Volume 41 (2020): Issue 1 (June 2020)

Volume 40 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)

Volume 40 (2019): Issue 1 (June 2019)

Volume 39 (2018): Issue 2 (December 2018)

Volume 39 (2018): Issue 1 (June 2018)

Volume 38 (2017): Issue 2 (December 2017)

Volume 38 (2017): Issue 1 (June 2017)

Volume 37 (2016): Issue 2 (December 2016)

Volume 37 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)

Volume 36 (2015): Issue 2 (December 2015)

Volume 36 (2015): Issue 1 (May 2015)

Studies in Chinese Linguistics

 STUDIES IN CHINESE LINGUISTICS (ISSN 1017-1274) is an international academic journal devoted to comparative study of Chinese language and linguistics and a platform for research of comparative linguistics and dialectal grammar under a comparative approach. It was first published in 1980 by T.T. Ng Chinese Language Research Centre (CLRC) of the Institute of Chinese Studies at The Chinese University of Hong Kong. The journal is edited by CLRC, published and distributed by Sciendo (formerly De Gruyter Open) since 2015, with a single volume yearly containing two issues, three articles in each issue on average. We especially welcome synchronic or diachronic comparative works on any aspects of the syntax, semantics, and morphology among Chinese dialects or between a Chinese language/dialect and any languages that contribute to theoretical linguistics or have significant theoretical implications.  The journal does not have article processing charges (APCs) nor article submission charges.  Rejection Rate   64%   Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 

Studies in Chinese Linguistics

Volume 42 (2021): Issue 1 (June 2021)

Temporally Underspecified Bare Clauses in Mandarin

The Intervention Effect in Late Archaic Chinese and Modern Mandarin

Conceptual Blending and Slang Expressions in Hong Kong Cantonese

Cerca

Tutti i volumi ed i numeri in questa rivista