- Dettagli della rivista
- Formato
- Rivista
- eISSN
- 2284-7308
- Pubblicato per la prima volta
- 20 Sep 2012
- Periodo di pubblicazione
- 3 volte all'anno
- Lingue
- Inglese
Cerca
- Accesso libero
The Contributions of the Council of Trent to the Catholic Reformation
Pagine: 3 - 20
Astratto
This article begins by examining what is meant by the Catholic Reformation and how it relates to the other frequently used term, Counter–Reformation. It then discusses the different ways Catholics and Protestants in the early 16th century understood ecclesial reform. Next there is a consideration of the call for a general or ecumenical council to resolve the differences between the Catholics and Protestant reformers; the reasons for the delay of the council; and the reasons why the Protestants did not participate. The article then provides a summary of the three main periods of the Council of Trent: 1545–1547; 1551–1552; and 1562–1563 along with the 1547–1549 Bologna period. This is followed by a detailed overview of the reforms of the council, which were both doctrinal and disciplinary. The article shows that, while abuses related to various Catholic practices and the sacraments were addressed, the main concerns in the various disciplinary decrees related to clerical corruption and immorality. The article addresses the need for bishops to reside in their dioceses; stop clerical corruption, greed, and nepotism; and establish seminaries for the proper formation of priests. After the review of the disciplinary reform decrees, attention is given to the
Parole chiave
- Council of Trent
- Catholic Reformation
- Counter Reformation
- clerical corruption
- Catechism of the Council of Trent
- Accesso libero
St. Robert Bellarmine, Conciliarism, and the Limits of Papal Power
Pagine: 21 - 40
Astratto
This article will examine Bellarmine’s first anti–conciliarist work, found in the
Parole chiave
- Bellarmine
- Conciliarism
- Infallibility
- Papal Heresy
- Magisterium
- Accesso libero
A ‘Chief Error’ of Protestant Soteriology: Sin in the Justified and Early Modern Catholic Theology
Pagine: 41 - 72
Astratto
Catholic theologians after Trent saw the Protestant teaching about the remnants of original sin in the justified as one of the ‘chief ’ errors of Protestant soteriology. Martin Luther, John Calvin, Martin Chemnitz, and many Protestant theologians believed that a view of concupiscence as sinful, strictly speaking, did away with any reliance on good works. This conviction also clarified the Christian’s dependence on the imputed righteousness of Christ. Catholic theologians condemned this position as detracting from the work of Christ who takes away the sins of the world. The rejection of this teaching—and the affirmation of Trent’s statement that original sin is taken away and that the justified at baptism is without stain or ‘immaculate’ before God—is essential for understanding Catholic opposition to Protestant soteriology. Two Spanish Dominican Thomists, Domingo de Soto and Bartolomé de Medina, rejected the Protestant teaching on imputation in part because of its connection with the view on the remnants of original sin in the justified. Adrian and Peter van Walenburch, brothers who served as auxiliary bishops of Cologne in the second half of the seventeenth century, argued that the Protestants of their time now agreed with the Catholic Church on a number of soteriological points. They also drew upon some of their post–Tridentine predecessors to offer a Catholic account of the imputation of Christ’s righteousness. Nonetheless, the issue of sin in the justified remained a point of serious controversy.
Parole chiave
- original sin
- justification
- imputation
- the Council of Trent
- Domingo de Soto
- Accesso libero
Original Sin, Preterition, and its Implications for Evangelization
Pagine: 73 - 101
Astratto
In this paper, I examine the four elements—universal sinfulness, natural sinfulness, inherited sinfulness, and Adamic sinfulness—of the doctrine of original sin in both the Reformed confessions, with particular attention to the Canons of Dort, and the Council of Trent’s definitive teaching on Original Sin. I give particular attention to the question regarding how all men are implicated in the sin of Adam. Realism and federalism will be analyzed as answers to this question. Even if a theological account is given that justifies the claim that God may justly impute Adam’s sin to his posterity, that still leaves unanswered the question of unconditional negative reprobation, also called, preterition (
Parole chiave
- Original sin
- preterition
- realism
- federalism
- essential asymmetry
- Accesso libero
Francisco Suárez’s Encounter with Calvin Over Human Freedom
Pagine: 103 - 118
Astratto
This essay explores Francisco Suárez’s account of the nature of human free will. To that end, Suárez’s engagement with John Calvin is considered so as to place the Jesuit’s account into greater relief. The conclusion of this study will reveal that, for Suárez, the human will’s freedom of self–determination is both caused by God and consists in its own indifference regarding the power to act and the power not to act.
Parole chiave
- Suárez
- Calvin
- Freedom
- Necessity
- Indifference
- Accesso libero
Philip Neri and Charles Borromeo as Models of Catholic Reform
Pagine: 119 - 136
Astratto
In the face of the external challenge of the Protestant Reformation, as well as the internal threat of spiritual, moral, and disciplinary corruption, two Catholic saints worked tirelessly to reform the Church in different but complementary ways. Philip Neri (1515–95) and Charles Borromeo (1538–84) led the Catholic Counter–Reformation during the middle–to–late sixteenth century, placing their distinctive gifts at the service of the Church. Philip Neri used his personal humility, intelligence, and charisma to attract the people of Rome to Christ, while Charles Borromeo employed his gifts for administration and his experience as a top aide to the pope to promote needed institutional reform. Both men achieved great personal holiness and moved others to holiness of life. It is their response to and sharing of the ‘universal call to holiness’, then, that constitutes the core of both of their approaches to ecclesial reform. Their focus on holiness, expressed in an emphasis on either the ‘charismatic’ or ‘hierarchical’ dimensions of the Church’s life, also provides a model for today’s Church, scarred as she is by scandal and in need of a new movement of reform.
Parole chiave
- Counter–Reformation
- Philip Neri
- Charles Borromeo
- Ecclesial Reform
- Holiness