<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

Prescribed levels of acceptable tax risk are increasingly used to articulate degrees of corporate tax responsibility, but the theoretical basis for doing so is not well established. This article (i) develops a theory of the relationship between tax risk and tax responsibility and (ii) shows that acceptable levels of tax risk <italic>could</italic> be used as a meaningful metric for these purposes, provided that the filing positions a n ticipated from proposed planning are reviewed against the prescribed level of acceptable risk without taking into account any mitigation of the risk factors that are introduced by the planning. Further, the article reviews the evolving tax risk policies of 20 large European companies, showing that while some progress is being made towards meaningful discourse, even the companies with the most well-developed policies are still making their claims in such a way as to conflate socially responsible tax behavior with diligence in implementing antisocial tax behavior.</abstract>

Acceptable levels of tax risk as a metric of corporate tax responsibility: theory, and a survey of practice

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

The article analyzes whether the investment in a private equity fund may create a permanent establishment (PE) for foreign investors. The analysis is divided into two main parts, as the question of creating a PE for the foreign investors is considered with respect to both the main PE rule and the agency PE rule. The amendments to the PE definition prescribed in the OECD/G20 BEPS report on Action 7, and incorporated into the 2017 version of the OECD Model with Commentary, are taken into consideration. It is concluded that the final outcome depends on the specific setup of the private equity fund at hand and that some degree of uncertainty may often remain. Moreover, the recent amendments to the PE definition do not appear to have reduced this uncertainty—rather the contrary.</abstract>

Permanent Establishment for Investors in Private Equity Funds—A Legal Analysis in Light of the Changes to the OECD Model (2017)

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

For a correct application of tax laws, it is central to know at what time or period the conditions of each case are to be tested against the respective tax rule. For example, in many questions, the conditions at the time of the transaction are decisive, but not seldom the tax rules take aim at the conditions at the end of the year – or some other time or period. It is also important to know what significance should be given to events after this time or period, not least when the income declaration is made and assessed. Here, these partly overlooked questions are presented and analyzed from the Swedish, Norwegian and Finnish income tax-perspectives.</abstract>

The Decisive Moment(s or periods) in the Application of Income Tax Rules and the Importance of Events Thereafter – a Swedish, Norwegian and Finnish Perspective and Comparison

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

Old age, illness, and/or physical and/or mental disabilities may limit the ability of an individual to generate enough income to cover basic costs of living. Most developed nations provide financial assistance to persons with limited abilities. In 1974, an Icelandic government passed an act of law providing a tax credit, payable to taxpayers under certain conditions. The tax allowance was applied first to settle the taxes and public levies owed by the taxpayer, with any amount remaining paid out to the individual. This system can be seen as a first, limited attempt at establishing a partial universal basic income of sorts. This social interaction between stakeholders on how to share the tax revenue between the taxpayers led to a government crisis. The shareholders in this partial universal basic income system, the state and municipalities, the old age community, the trade unions, and the employers all have different financial and political interests and were affected by this reform. The lesson is that a basic income would need strong supporters if implemented, where the role of the government and/or the parliament would be mapped. Its supporters must be able to withstand the pressure from the social partners in the labor market because of the interactivity of the social security system and the pension fund system, which is not a part of the fiscal system in Iceland. The conflict of interests becomes apparent.</abstract>

Basic Income—an early Icelandic experiment**

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

The tax gap between taxes that are “actually” paid and taxes that “ought” to have been paid by multinational corporate entities has become an area of huge public policy concern in the recent decades. This study reviews the impact of new legislation to reveal the tax gap created by the EU banks and financial institutions passed in 2013 and in particular of the quality of the resulting country-by-country reporting (CBCR) requirement for banks. Although resulting tax gap estimates are noted, they suffer due to significant problems in the published data; much of it is due to the quality of the regulation requiring its publication and implementation. The findings reveal a lack of understanding of the technical and structural weaknesses of accounting in a transnational context in the design of this regulation. CBCR is destined to fail in achieving its regulatory objectives in this context unless necessary reform of the regulation is undertaken.
</abstract>

Professor of Practice in International Political Economy

BEPS Policy Failure—The Case of EU Country-By-Country Reporting<xref ref-type="fn" rid="j_ntaxj-2019-0005_fn_001">1</xref>

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 2023 (2023): Issue 1 (December 2023)

Volume 2022 (2022): Issue 1 (December 2022)

Volume 2021 (2021): Issue 1 (October 2021)

Volume 2020 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)

Volume 2019 (2019): Issue 1 (January 2019)

Volume 2018 (2018): Issue 1 (January 2018)

Volume 2017 (2017): Issue 1 (January 2017)

Volume 2016 (2016): Issue 2 (November 2016)

Volume 2016 (2016): Issue 1 (May 2016)

Volume 2015 (2015): Issue 2 (December 2015)

Volume 2015 (2015): Issue 1 (September 2015)

Volume 2014 (2014): Issue 2 (November 2014)

Volume 2014 (2014): Issue 1 (May 2014)

Nordic Tax Journal

The winner of the 2023 Nordic Tax Council´s Article Prize can be found here.  Nordic Tax Journal is a peer reviewed, open access journal that publishes original, scholarly works on all aspects of taxation. It aims to promote contemporary research of tax-related issues, from both legal and economic perspectives, and to provide a platform for academics, researchers, practitioners, administrators, judges and policy makers to enhance their understanding and knowledge of taxation in the Nordic region. Although we appreciate a Nordic angle in manuscripts, it is not a requirement.  Nordic Tax Journal is published by the Nordic Tax Research Council, a resource for academics, tax officials, practitioners and policymakers pursuing high quality tax research throughout the Nordic region.  The articles in Nordic Tax Journal are published continuously throughout the year. It is abstracted and indexed in numerous relevant services (listed under the "Abstracting &amp; Indexing" tab), and ranked among the top law/economic journals in the Nordic region. The journal does not have article processing charges (APCs) or article submission charges.  Contributors are encouraged to submit their manuscripts to Nordic Tax Journal through its electronic submission system Editorial Manager.  The Nordic Tax Research Council's ARTICLE PRIZE €3.000The Nordic Tax Research Council's Article Prize is awarded yearly to the author of an article published in Nordic Tax Journal (NTaxJ).As from 2019 a prize of 3.000 EUR is awarded at the Council's annual spring seminar, by the Council Chair and the Editor-in-Chief of Nordic Tax Journal. The assessment criteria for the Article Prize are the same as for publication in Nordic Tax Journal: high quality research on taxation relevant to the Nordic countries. Authors can apply to enter the contest when submitting a manuscript to NTaxJ.  Nordic Tax Journal is ranked on the following Nordic academic lists:   Top rankDanish Ministry of Higher Education and Science (Page 185)   Scientific Level 1Norwegian Social Science Data Services   Level 1Publication Forum Federation of Finnish Learned Societies Visit our FacebookVisit our Twitter  Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process.  Target group   academics, researchers, practitioners, administrators, judges and policy makers interested in the taxation systems in the Nordic region 

Nordic Tax Journal

Volume 2019 (2019): Issue 1 (January 2019)

Article

Acceptable levels of tax risk as a metric of corporate tax responsibility: theory, and a survey of practice

Permanent Establishment for Investors in Private Equity Funds—A Legal Analysis in Light of the Changes to the OECD Model (2017)

The Decisive Moment(s or periods) in the Application of Income Tax Rules and the Importance of Events Thereafter – a Swedish, Norwegian and Finnish Perspective and Comparison

Basic Income—an early Icelandic experiment**

BEPS Policy Failure—The Case of EU Country-By-Country Reporting¹

Cerca

Tutti i volumi ed i numeri in questa rivista

Nordic Tax Journal

Volume 2019 (2019): Issue 1 (January 2019)

Article

Acceptable levels of tax risk as a metric of corporate tax responsibility: theory, and a survey of practice

Permanent Establishment for Investors in Private Equity Funds—A Legal Analysis in Light of the Changes to the OECD Model (2017)

The Decisive Moment(s or periods) in the Application of Income Tax Rules and the Importance of Events Thereafter – a Swedish, Norwegian and Finnish Perspective and Comparison

Basic Income—an early Icelandic experiment**

BEPS Policy Failure—The Case of EU Country-By-Country Reporting1

Cerca

Tutti i volumi ed i numeri in questa rivista

BEPS Policy Failure—The Case of EU Country-By-Country Reporting¹