The psychological focus of white house press secretaries during scandal: A case study of the Obama and Trump administrations

Bartoń, K. (2020). MuMIn (1.43.17). Search in Google Scholar

Baumgardner, P. (2013). Barack, Benghazi, and bungles: Tracing the Obama administration’s handling of the Benghazi Attacks. Cornell International Affairs Review, 6(2), 1–2. Search in Google Scholar

Bell, L. (2012, November 5). Regardless of who wins on tuesday, Benghazigate is not going away. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/larry-bell/2012/11/05/regardless-of-who-wins-on-tuesday-benghazigate-is-not-going-away/?sh=187fed6fd36c Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. A. (2007). Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Search in Google Scholar

Blackburn, K. G., Yilmaz, G., & Boyd, R. L. (2018). Food for thought: Exploring how people think and talk about food online. Appetite, 123, 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.022 Search in Google Scholar

Bowler, S., & Karp, J. A. (2004). Politicians, scandals, and trust in government. Political Behavior, 26(3), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POBE.0000043456.87303.3a Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, R. L., Blackburn, K. G., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2020). The narrative arc: Revealing core narrative structures through text analysis. Science Advances, 6(32), eaba2196–eaba2196. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba2196 Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, R. L., & Schwartz, H. A. (2021). Natural language analysis and the psychology of verbal behavior: The past, present, and future states of the field. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20967028 Search in Google Scholar

Braun, M. T., Van Swol, L. M., & Vang, L. (2015). His lips are moving: Pinocchio effect and other lexical indicators of political deceptions. Discourse Processes, 52(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.942833 Search in Google Scholar

Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonal Deception Theory. Communication Theory, 6(3), 203–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00127.x Search in Google Scholar

Chen, X., & Hu, J. (2019). Evolution of U.S. presidential discourse over 230 years: A psycholinguistic perspective. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(4), p28. https://doi.org/10.5539/IJEL.V9N4P28 Search in Google Scholar

Cohn, M. A., Mehl, M. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2004). Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological Science, 15(10), 687–693. https://doi.org/10.2307/40064028 Search in Google Scholar

Department of Justice. (2017, May 17). Appointment of Special Counsel. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/appointment-special-counsel Search in Google Scholar

Dillard, J. P., Segrin, C., & Harden, J. M. (1989). Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Communication Monographs, 56(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758909390247 Search in Google Scholar

Dziuda, W., & Howell, W. G. (2021). Political scandal: A theory. American Journal of Political Science, 65(1), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12568 Search in Google Scholar

Eshbaugh-Soha, M. (2016). Presidential agenda-setting of traditional and nontraditional news media. Political Communication, 33(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.958261 Search in Google Scholar

Galanes, P. (2016, May 6). Barack Obama and Bryan Cranston on the roles of a lifetime. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/08/fashion/barack-obama-bryan-cranston-table-for-three.html Search in Google Scholar

Garrard, J., & Newell, J. L. (2006). Scandals in past and contemporary politics. Manchester University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Hauch, V., Blandón-Gitlin, I., Masip, J., & Sporer, S. L. (2015). Are computers effective lie detectors? A meta-analysis of linguistic cues to deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 307–342. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/1088868314556539 Search in Google Scholar

Ireland, M. E., & Mehl, M. (2014). Natural language use as a marker of personality. In T. M. Holtgraves (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology. Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Ireland, M. E., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language style matching in writing: Synchrony in essays, correspondence, and poetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020386 Search in Google Scholar

Johansson, E., & Johansson, K. M. (2022). Along the government–media frontier: Press secretaries offline/online. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(S1), e2759. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2759 Search in Google Scholar

Jordan, K. N., Sterling, J., Pennebaker, J. W., & Boyd, R. L. (2019). Examining long-term trends in politics and culture through language of political leaders and cultural institutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(9), 3476–3481. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811987116 Search in Google Scholar

Kacewicz, E., Pennebaker, J. W., Davis, M., Jeon, M., & Graesser, A. C. (2014). Pronoun use reflects standings in social hierarchies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x13502654 Search in Google Scholar

Klein, W. (2008). All the Presidents’ spokesmen: Spinning the news, White House press secretaries from Franklin D. Roosevelt to George W. Bush. Praeger. Search in Google Scholar

Luke, T. J. (2019). Lessons from Pinocchio: Cues to deception may be highly exaggerated. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(4), 646–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619838258 Search in Google Scholar

Maier, J. (2011). The impact of political scandals on political support: An experimental test of two theories. International Political Science Review, 32(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110378056 Search in Google Scholar

Markowitz, D. M. (2018). Academy Awards speeches reflect social status, cinematic roles, and winning expectations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(3), 376–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x17751012 Search in Google Scholar

Markowitz, D. M. (2021). The meaning extraction method: An approach to evaluate content patterns from large-scale language data. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.588823 Search in Google Scholar

Markowitz, D. M. (2022). Psychological trauma and emotional upheaval as revealed in academic writing: The case of COVID-19. Cognition and Emotion, 36(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2021.2022602 Search in Google Scholar

Markowitz, D. M., & Hancock, J. T. (2016). Linguistic obfuscation in fraudulent science. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35(4), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X15614605 Search in Google Scholar

Markowitz, D. M., & Hancock, J. T. (2019). Deception and language: The Contextual Organization of Language and Deception (COLD) framework. In T. Docan-Morgan (Ed.), The palgrave handbook of deceptive communication (pp. 193–212). Palgrave Mcmillan. Search in Google Scholar

Markowitz, D. M., Kouchaki, M., Hancock, J. T., & Gino, F. (2021). The deception spiral: Corporate obfuscation leads to perceptions of immorality and cheating behavior. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(2), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20949594 Search in Google Scholar

Markowitz, D. M., & Slovic, P. (2020). Communicating imperatives requires psychological closeness but creates psychological distance. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(5–6), 598–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20902816 Search in Google Scholar

Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., & Richards, J. M. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029005010 Search in Google Scholar

Olson, J., Ouyang, Y., Poe, J., Trantham, A., & Waterman, R. W. (2012). The teleprompter presidency: Comparing Obama’s campaign and governing rhetoric. Social Science Quarterly, 93(5), 1402–1423. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-6237.2012.00925.X Search in Google Scholar

Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Booth, R. J., Ashokkumar, A., & Francis, M. E. (2022). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC-22. Pennebaker Conglomerates. https://www.liwc.app Search in Google Scholar

Pfiffner, J. P. (1999). The contemporary presidency: Presidential lies. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 29(4), 903–917. Search in Google Scholar

Puglisi, R., & Snyder, J. M. (2011). Newspaper coverage of political scandals. The Journal of Politics, 73(3), 931–950. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611000569 Search in Google Scholar

Seraj, S., Blackburn, K. G., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2021). Language left behind on social media exposes the emotional and cognitive costs of a romantic breakup. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(7), e2017154118–e2017154118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2017154118 Search in Google Scholar

Sonner, M. W., & Wilcox, C. (1999). Forgiving and forgetting: Public support for Bill Clinton during the Lewinsky scandal. PS: Political Science and Politics, 32(3), 554–557. https://doi.org/10.2307/420644 Search in Google Scholar

Spicer, S. (2017, January 21). Remarks to the press by Press Secretary Sean Spicer. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-the-press-press-secretary-sean-spicer Search in Google Scholar

Stockemer, D., & Praino, R. (2019). The good, the bad and the ugly: Do attractive politicians get a ‘break’ when they are involved in scandals? Political Behavior, 41(3), 747–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9469-1 Search in Google Scholar

Swire-Thompson, B., Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Berinsky, A. J. (2020). They might be a liar but they’re my liar: Source evaluation and the prevalence of misinformation. Political Psychology, 41(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12586 Search in Google Scholar

The Moscow Project. (2021). Timeline—The Moscow Project. https://themoscowproject.org/collusion-timeline/index.html Search in Google Scholar

Turner, R. E., Edgley, C., & Olmstead, G. (1975). Information control in conversations: Honesty is not always the best policy. Kansas Journal of Sociology, 11, 69–89. Search in Google Scholar

Woolley, J. T., & Peters, G. (2009). The American presidency project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ Search in Google Scholar

Xi, R., & Singh, M. P. (2023). The blame game: Understanding blame assignment in social media. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2023.3261242 Search in Google Scholar