[
Antoniou, M., Ettlinger, M., & Wong, P. C. M. (2016). Complexity, training paradigm design, and the contribution of memory subsystems to grammar learning. PLoS One 11(7), e0158812. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158812
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baddeley, A.D., Gathercole, S, & Papagno, C, (1998). The phonological loop as a language acquisition device. Psychological Review, 105, 158–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.158
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biedroń, A. & Szczepaniak, A. (2012). Working-memory and short-term memory abilities in accomplished multilinguals. Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01332.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bielak, J., & Pawlak, M. (2013). Applying cognitive grammar in the foreign language classroom: teaching english tense and aspect. Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brzezinski, J., Gaul, M., Hornowska, E., Machowski, A., & Zakrzewska, M. (1996). Skala inteligencji D. Wechslera dla dorosłych. Wersja zrewidowana. WAIS-R (Pl). Podręcznik [Wechsler adult intelligence scale. A revised version. WAIS-R (Pl). Manual]. Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DeKeyser, R. (2009). Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 119–138). Wiley-Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DeKeyser, R. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition. An introduction (pp. 94–112). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DeKeyser, R. (2017). Knowledge and skill in SLA. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 15–32). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DeKeyser, R. M., & Juffs, A. (2005). Cognitive considerations in L2 learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 437–454). Lawrence Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54(2), 227–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00255.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, R. (2006). Modeling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 431–463. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3–25). Multilingual Matters.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Multilingual Matters.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Engel de Abreu, P. M., & Gathercole, S. E. (2012). Executive and phonological processes in second-language acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 974–986. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028390
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ettlinger, M., Bradlow, A. R., & Wong, P. C. M. (2014). Variability in the learning of complex morphophonology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(4), 807–831. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000586
]Search in Google Scholar
[
French L. (2006). Phonological working memory and second language acquisition: A developmental study of francophone children learning English in Quebec. Edwin Mellen Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
French, L. M., & O’Brien, I. (2008). Phonological memory and children’s second language grammar learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(3), 463–487. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716408080211
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gagné, N., French, L. M., & Hummel, K. M. (2022). Investigating the contribution of L1 fluency, L2 initial fluency, working memory and phonological memory to L2 fluency development. Language Teaching Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221076418
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 445–474. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000149
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grey, S., Cox, J. G., Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C. (2015). The role of individual differences in the study abroad context: Cognitive capacity and language development during short-term intensive language exposure. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12190
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gutiérrez, X. (2013). The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 423–449. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000041
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working-memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, Y., Payant, C., & Pearson, P. (2015). The intersection of task-based interaction, task complexity, and working memory: L2 question development through recasts in a laboratory setting. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(3), 549–581. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000618
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Pergamon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Neter, J. (2004). Applied linear regression models. McGraw-Hill Irwin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laessig, R. D., Duckett, E. J. (1979). Canonical correlation analysis: potential for environmental health planning. American Journal of Public Health, 69(4), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.69.4.353
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Learning grammar: From grammar to grammaring. Henle & Heinle.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, S. (2013). The differential roles of language analytic ability and working memory in mediating the effects of two types of feedback on the acquisition of an opaque linguistic structure. In C. Sanz, & B. Lado (Eds.), Individual differences, L2 development & language program administration: From theory to application (pp. 32–52). Cengage Learning.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, S. (2019). Six decades of language aptitude research: A comprehensive and critical review. In Z. E. Wen, P. Skehan, A. Biedroń, S. Li, & R. Sparks (Eds.), Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice (pp. 78–97). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y. (2019). The associations between cognitive ability and L2 development under five different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(3), 693–722. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000796
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 861–883. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological STM and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 379–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000125
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Collentine, J., & Freed, B. (2006). Phonological memory and lexical, narrative, and grammatical skills in second language oral production by adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(3), 377–402. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060322
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pawlak, M. (2019). Tapping the distinction between explicit and implicit knowledge: Methodological issues. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Contacts & contrasts in educational contexts and translation (pp. 45–60). Springer Nature.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pawlak, M., & Biedroń, A. (2019) Verbal working memory as a predictor of explicit and implicit knowledge of English passive voice. Journal of Second Language Studies, 2(2), 258–280. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.19007.paw
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pawlak, M., & Biedroń, A. (2021). Working memory as a factor mediating explicit and implicit knowledge of English grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 41, 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190521000052
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pienemann, M., & Lenzing, A. (2015). Processability theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 159–179). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is ‘big’? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Révész, A. (2012). Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 62(1), 93–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00690.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sagarra, N. (2017). Longitudinal effects of working memory on L2 grammar and reading abilities. Second Language Research, 33(3), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658317690577
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santamaria, K., & Sunderman, G. (2015). Working memory in processing instruction: The acquisition of L2 French clitics. In Z. Wen, M. B. Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 205–223). Multilingual Matters.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sanz, C., Lin, H.-J., Lado, B., Stafford, C. A., & Bowden, H.W. (2014). One size fits all? Learning conditions and working memory capacity in ab initio language development. Applied Linguistics, 37(5). 669–692. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu058
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Serafini, E. & Sanz, C. (2016). Evidence for the decreasing impact of cognitive ability on second language development as proficiency increases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(4), 607–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000327
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67(4), 747–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12241
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tagarelli, K. M., Borges Mota, M., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). Working memory, learning conditions, and the acquisition of L2 syntax. In Z. Wen, M. Borges Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: theory, research and commentary (pp. 224–247). Multilingual Matters.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ullman, M. T. (2015). The declarative/procedural model. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 135–158). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verhagen, J., Leseman, P., & Messer, M. (2015). Phonological memory and the acquisition of grammar in child L2 learners. Language Learning, 65(2), 417–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755607
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wen, E. Z. (2016). Working memory and second language learning: Towards an integrated approach. Multilingual Matters.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wen, E. Z. (2019). Working memory as language aptitude: The phonological / executive model. In Z. E. Wen, P. Skehan, A. Biedroń, S. Li, & R. Sparks (Eds.), Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice (pp. 187–215). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wen, E. Z., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2016). Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Language Teaching 50(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000276
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wen, Z., & Li, S. (2019). Working memory in L2 learning and processing. In J. Schwieter & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 365–389). Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williams, J. N., & Lovatt, P. (2003). Phonological memory and rule learning. Language Learning, 53(1), 67–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00211
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, R. (2015). Measuring university-level L2 learners’ implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(3), 457–486. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000370
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zychowicz, K., Biedroń, A., & Pawlak, M. (2017). Polish Listening Span: A new tool for measuring verbal working memory. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7, 601–618.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zychowicz, K., Biedroń, A., & Pawlak, M. (2018). Polish Nonword Span (PNWSPAN): A new tool for measuring phonological loop capacity. Glottodidactica, 45(2). 309–327. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/gl.2018.45.2.18
]Search in Google Scholar
, 