This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Wuerz RC, Milne LW, Eitel DR, Travers D, Gilboy N. Reliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument. Acad Emerg Med. 2000; 7:236-42.10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb01066.x10730830WuerzRCMilneLWEitelDRTraversDGilboyNReliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument200072364210730830Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Murray M, Bullard M, Grafstein E; for the CTAS and CEDIS National Working Groups. Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale Implementation Guidelines. CJEM. 2004; 6: 421-7.10.1017/S1481803500009428MurrayMBullardMGrafsteinEfor the CTAS and CEDIS National Working Groups. Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale Implementation Guidelines200464217Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Travers DA, Waller AE, Bowling JM, Flowers D, Tintinalli J. Five-level triage system more effective than three-level in tertiary emergency department. J Emerg Nurs. 2002; 28:395-400.10.1067/men.2002.12718412386619TraversDAWallerAEBowlingJMFlowersDTintinalliJFive-level triage system more effective than three-level in tertiary emergency department200228395400Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jelinek GA, Little M. Inter-rater reliability of the National Triage Scale over 11,500 simulated occasions of triage. Emerg Med. 1996; 8:226-30.JelinekGALittleMInter-rater reliability of the National Triage Scale over 11,500 simulated occasions of triage199682263010.1111/j.1442-2026.1996.tb00277.xSearch in Google Scholar
Beveridge R, Ducharme J, Janes L, Beaulieu S, Walter S. Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 34:155-9.1042491510.1016/S0196-0644(99)70223-4BeveridgeRDucharmeJJanesLBeaulieuSWalterSReliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement1999341559Search in Google Scholar
Richardson D. No relationship between emergency department activity and triage categorization. Acad Emerg Med. 1998; 6:141-5.RichardsonDNo relationship between emergency department activity and triage categorization19986141510.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02599.x9492135Search in Google Scholar
Downey LV, Zun LS, Burke T. Comparison of Canadian triage acuity scale to Australian Emergency Mental Health Scale triage system for psychiatric patients. Int Emerg Nurs. 2015; 23:138-43.2508241510.1016/j.ienj.2014.06.006DowneyLVZunLSBurkeTComparison of Canadian triage acuity scale to Australian Emergency Mental Health Scale triage system for psychiatric patients2015231384325082415Search in Google Scholar
Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. Canadian Emergency Department Triage and acuity scale implementation guidelines. J Can Assoc Emerg Phys. 1999; 1:S1-16.Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. Canadian Emergency Department Triage and acuity scale implementation guidelines19991S116Search in Google Scholar
Wurez RC, Milne LW, Eitel DR, Travers D, Gilboy N. Reliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument. Acad Emerg Med. 2000; 7236-2.WurezRCMilneLWEitelDRTraversDGilboyNReliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument20007236210.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb01066.xSearch in Google Scholar
Wurez RC, Travers D, Gilboy N, Eitel DR, Rosenau A, Yazhari R. Implementation and refinement of the emergency severity index. Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8: 170-6.10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01283.x11157294WurezRCTraversDGilboyNEitelDRRosenauAYazhariRImplementation and refinement of the emergency severity index20018170611157294Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
ESI Triage Study Group Wurez R. Emergency severity index triage category is associated with six-month survival. Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8:61-4.ESI Triage Study Group Wurez R. Emergency severity index triage category is associated with six-month survival20018614Search in Google Scholar
Tanabe P, Travers D, Rosenau A, Gilboy N, Wuerz R. The Emergency Severity Index Triage algorithm version 2 is reliable and valid. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10:1070-80.10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00577.x14525740TanabePTraversDRosenauAGilboyNWuerzRThe Emergency Severity Index Triage algorithm version 2 is reliable and valid20031010708014525740Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Platts-Mills TF, Travers D, Biese K, McCall B, Kizer S, La Mantia, Busby JW, Cairns CB. Accuracy of the Emergency Severity Triage instrument for identifying elder emergency department patients receiving an immediate life-saving intervention. Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17:238-43.2037075510.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00670.xPlatts-MillsTFTraversDBieseKMcCallBKizerSLaMantiaBusbyJWCairnsCBAccuracy of the Emergency Severity Triage instrument for identifying elder emergency department patients receiving an immediate life-saving intervention20101723843Search in Google Scholar
Chi CJ, Huang CM. Comparison of the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) and the Taiwan Triage System in predicting resource utilization. J Formos Med Assoc. 2006; 105:617-25.10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60160-116935762ChiCJHuangCMComparison of the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) and the Taiwan Triage System in predicting resource utilization200610561725Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wuerz R. Emergency Severity Index triage category is associated with six-month survival. ESI triage study group. Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8:61-4.WuerzREmergency Severity Index triage category is associated with six-month survival2001861410.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00554.x11136151Search in Google Scholar
Grossman FF, Nickel CH, Christ M, Schneider K, Spirig R, Bingisser R. Transporting clinical tools to new settings: Cultural adaptation and validation of the Emergency Severity Index in German. Ann Emerg Med. 20711; 57:257-64.GrossmanFFNickelCHChristMSchneiderKSpirigRBingisserRTransporting clinical tools to new settings: Cultural adaptation and validation of the Emergency Severity Index in German20711572576410.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.07.02120952097Search in Google Scholar
Storm-Versloot MN, Ubbink D T, Kappelhof J, Luitse JSK. Comparison of an informally structured triage system, the emergency severity index, and the Manchester triage system to distinguish patient priority in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18:822-9.10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01122.x21843217Storm-VerslootMNUbbinkDTKappelhofJLuitseJSKComparison of an informally structured triage system, the emergency severity index, and the Manchester triage system to distinguish patient priority in the Emergency Department201118822921843217Open DOISearch in Google Scholar