[1. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson A. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986; 1:11-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Becker W, Becker BE, Alsuwyed A, Al-Mubarak S. Long-term evaluation of 282 implants in maxillary and mandibular molar positions: a prospective study. J Periodontol. 1999; 70:896-901.10.1902/jop.1999.70.8.896]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[3. Bergkvist G, Koh KJ, Sahlholm S, Klintstrom E, Lindh C. Bone density at implant sites and its relationship to assessment of bone quality and treatment outcome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25:321-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Marquezan M, Osorio A, Sant’Anna E, Souza MM, Maia L. Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2012; 23:767-74.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02228.x]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Rothman SLG, Chaftez N, Rhodes ML, Schwarz MS. CT in the preoperative assessment of mandible and maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Radiology. 1988; 168:171-5.10.1148/radiology.168.1.3380955]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[6. Benson BW, Prihoda TJ, Glass BJ. Variations in adult cortical bone mass as measured by a panoramic mandibular index. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991; 71:349-56.10.1016/0030-4220(91)90314-3]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Kido H, Schulz EE, Kakura K, Yamamoto K, Morinaga K, Matsuura M. Human mandibular trabecular bone density correlation with mechanical strength: implications for implant dentistry. Implant Dent. 2011; 20:323-6.10.1097/ID.0b013e31822608f4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[8. Shapurian T, Damoulis PD, Reiser GM, Griffin TJ, Rand WM. Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21:290-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Duckmanton N, Austin B, Lechner S, Klineberg I. Imaging for predictable maxillary implants. Int J Prosthodont. 1994; 7:77-80.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. de Oliveira RC, Leles CR, Normanha LM, Lindh C, Ribeiro-Rotta RF. Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 105:231-8.10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[11. Ulm C, Blahout R, Matejka M, Gruber H. Reduction of compact and cancellous bone substances of the edentulous mandible caused by resorption. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992; 74:131-6.10.1016/0030-4220(92)90370-6]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Lindh C, Nilsson M, Klinge B, Petersson A. Quantitative computed tomography of trabecular bone in the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996; 25: 146-50.10.1259/dmfr.25.3.90842639084263]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2003; 31:825-33.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006; 72:75-80.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Isoda K, Ayukawa Y, Tsukiyama Y, Sogo M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. Relationship between the bone density estimated by cone-beam computed tomography and the primary stability of dental implants. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2012; 23:832-6.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02203.x21545533]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Choi JH, Park CH, Yi SW, Lim HJ, Hwang HS. Bone density measurement in interdental areas with simulated placement of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136: 766. e1-12.10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.01919962594]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol. 2000; 5:22-31.10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.2211885179]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[18. Feldman S, Boitel N, Weng D, Kohles SS, Stach RM. Five Year Survival Distributions of Short Length (10 mm or less) Machined Surfaced and OsseotiteR Implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004; 6:16-23.10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00023.x15595705]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[19. Herrmann I, Lekholm U, Holm S, Kultje C. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20:220-30.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Naitoh M, Hirukawa A, Katsumata A, Ariji E. Evaluation of voxel values in mandibular cancellous bone: relationship between cone-beam computed tomography and multislice helical computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20:503-6.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01672.x19250241]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Naitoh M, Katsumata A, Mitsuya S, Kamemoto H, Ariji E. Measurement of mandibles with microfocus X-ray computerized tomography and compact computerized tomography for dental use. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19:239-46.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Araryarachkul P, Caruso J, Gantes B, Schulz E, Riggs M, Dus I, et al. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20: 416-24.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. Implant Dentistry. 1999; 8:90.10.1097/00008505-199901000-00013]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[24. Park HS, Lee YJ, Jeong SH, Kwon TG. Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133: 30-7.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.04418174068]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Finkelstein JS, Lee ML, Sowers M, Ettinger B, Neer RM, Kelsey JL, et al. Ethnic variation in bone density in premenopausal and early perimenopausal women: effects of anthropometric and lifestyle factors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 87:3057-67.10.1210/jcem.87.7.865412107201]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[26. Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39:323-35.10.1259/dmfr/19603304352023620729181]Search in Google Scholar