Evaluation of cancellous bone density in the alveolar bone by cone-beam computed tomography in Taiwanese adults

1. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson A. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986; 1:11-25.Search in Google Scholar

2. Becker W, Becker BE, Alsuwyed A, Al-Mubarak S. Long-term evaluation of 282 implants in maxillary and mandibular molar positions: a prospective study. J Periodontol. 1999; 70:896-901.10.1902/jop.1999.70.8.896Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Bergkvist G, Koh KJ, Sahlholm S, Klintstrom E, Lindh C. Bone density at implant sites and its relationship to assessment of bone quality and treatment outcome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25:321-8.Search in Google Scholar

4. Marquezan M, Osorio A, Sant’Anna E, Souza MM, Maia L. Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2012; 23:767-74.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02228.xSearch in Google Scholar

5. Rothman SLG, Chaftez N, Rhodes ML, Schwarz MS. CT in the preoperative assessment of mandible and maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Radiology. 1988; 168:171-5.10.1148/radiology.168.1.3380955Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Benson BW, Prihoda TJ, Glass BJ. Variations in adult cortical bone mass as measured by a panoramic mandibular index. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991; 71:349-56.10.1016/0030-4220(91)90314-3Search in Google Scholar

7. Kido H, Schulz EE, Kakura K, Yamamoto K, Morinaga K, Matsuura M. Human mandibular trabecular bone density correlation with mechanical strength: implications for implant dentistry. Implant Dent. 2011; 20:323-6.10.1097/ID.0b013e31822608f4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Shapurian T, Damoulis PD, Reiser GM, Griffin TJ, Rand WM. Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21:290-7.Search in Google Scholar

9. Duckmanton N, Austin B, Lechner S, Klineberg I. Imaging for predictable maxillary implants. Int J Prosthodont. 1994; 7:77-80.Search in Google Scholar

10. de Oliveira RC, Leles CR, Normanha LM, Lindh C, Ribeiro-Rotta RF. Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 105:231-8.10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

11. Ulm C, Blahout R, Matejka M, Gruber H. Reduction of compact and cancellous bone substances of the edentulous mandible caused by resorption. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992; 74:131-6.10.1016/0030-4220(92)90370-6Search in Google Scholar

12. Lindh C, Nilsson M, Klinge B, Petersson A. Quantitative computed tomography of trabecular bone in the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996; 25: 146-50.10.1259/dmfr.25.3.90842639084263Search in Google Scholar

13. Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2003; 31:825-33.Search in Google Scholar

14. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006; 72:75-80.Search in Google Scholar

15. Isoda K, Ayukawa Y, Tsukiyama Y, Sogo M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. Relationship between the bone density estimated by cone-beam computed tomography and the primary stability of dental implants. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2012; 23:832-6.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02203.x21545533Search in Google Scholar

16. Choi JH, Park CH, Yi SW, Lim HJ, Hwang HS. Bone density measurement in interdental areas with simulated placement of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136: 766. e1-12.10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.01919962594Search in Google Scholar

17. Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol. 2000; 5:22-31.10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.2211885179Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Feldman S, Boitel N, Weng D, Kohles SS, Stach RM. Five Year Survival Distributions of Short Length (10 mm or less) Machined Surfaced and OsseotiteR Implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004; 6:16-23.10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00023.x15595705Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Herrmann I, Lekholm U, Holm S, Kultje C. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20:220-30.Search in Google Scholar

20. Naitoh M, Hirukawa A, Katsumata A, Ariji E. Evaluation of voxel values in mandibular cancellous bone: relationship between cone-beam computed tomography and multislice helical computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20:503-6.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01672.x19250241Search in Google Scholar

21. Naitoh M, Katsumata A, Mitsuya S, Kamemoto H, Ariji E. Measurement of mandibles with microfocus X-ray computerized tomography and compact computerized tomography for dental use. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19:239-46.Search in Google Scholar

22. Araryarachkul P, Caruso J, Gantes B, Schulz E, Riggs M, Dus I, et al. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20: 416-24.Search in Google Scholar

23. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. Implant Dentistry. 1999; 8:90.10.1097/00008505-199901000-00013Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24. Park HS, Lee YJ, Jeong SH, Kwon TG. Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133: 30-7.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.04418174068Search in Google Scholar

25. Finkelstein JS, Lee ML, Sowers M, Ettinger B, Neer RM, Kelsey JL, et al. Ethnic variation in bone density in premenopausal and early perimenopausal women: effects of anthropometric and lifestyle factors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 87:3057-67.10.1210/jcem.87.7.865412107201Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26. Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39:323-35.10.1259/dmfr/19603304352023620729181Search in Google Scholar