Nature of Charge for Breach of Budgetary Discipline from Czech Perspective

Act No. 218/2000 Col., on budgetary rules, as amended. Act No. 218/2000 Col., on budgetary rules, as amended Search in Google Scholar

Act No. 280/2009 Col., Tax Procedure Code, as amended. Act No. 280/2009 Col., Tax Procedure Code, as amended Search in Google Scholar

Act No. 134/2016 Col., on public procurements, as amended. Act No. 134/2016 Col., on public procurements, as amended Search in Google Scholar

Engel and Others v. The Netherlands App no 5100/71, 5101/71, 5102/71, 5354/72 et 5370/72 (ECHR, 8 June 1976). Engel and Others v. The Netherlands App no 5100/71, 5101/71, 5102/71, 5354/72 et 5370/72 ECHR 8 June 1976 Search in Google Scholar

Bendenoun v. France App no 12547/86 (ECHR, 24 February 1994). Bendenoun v. France App no 12547/86 ECHR 24 February 1994 Search in Google Scholar

Stephen Andrew Benham v. the United Kingdom App no 19380/92 (ECHR, 29 November 1994). Stephen Andrew Benham v. the United Kingdom App no 19380/92 ECHR 29 November 1994 Search in Google Scholar

Jussila v. Finland App no 73053/01 (ECHR, 23 November 2006). Jussila v. Finland App no 73053/01 ECHR 23 November 2006 Search in Google Scholar

SergeyZolotukhin v. Russia App no 14939/03 (ECHR, 10 February 2009). SergeyZolotukhin v. Russia App no 14939/03 ECHR 10 February 2009 Search in Google Scholar

Nicoleta Gheorghe v. Romania App no 23470/05 (ECHR, 3 April 2012). Nicoleta Gheorghe v. Romania App no 23470/05 ECHR 3 April 2012 Search in Google Scholar

Kapetanios and Others v. Greece App no 3453/12, 42941/12 et 9028/13 (ECHR, 30 April 2015). Kapetanios and Others v. Greece App no 3453/12, 42941/12 et 9028/13 ECHR 30 April 2015 Search in Google Scholar

A and B v. Norway App no 24130/11 et 29758/11 (ECHR, 15 November 2016). A and B v. Norway App no 24130/11 et 29758/11 ECHR 15 November 2016 10.32964/TJ15.11 Search in Google Scholar

Willem Bastiaan van Bockel, The ne bis in idem principle in EU law. A conceptual and jurisprudential analysis(1st edn, Ipskamp Drukkers, Amsterdam 2009) 308. van BockelWillem Bastiaan The ne bis in idem principle in EU law. A conceptual and jurisprudential analysis 1st edn Ipskamp Drukkers Amsterdam 2009 308 Search in Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights, ‘Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Right to a fair trial (criminal limb)’ (2014) <https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_6_criminal_ENG.pdf> accessed 7 January 2018. European Court of Human Rights ‘Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Right to a fair trial (criminal limb)’ 2014 <https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_6_criminal_ENG.pdf> accessed 7 January 2018. Search in Google Scholar

Kateřina Frumarová et al, Správní trestání (1st edn, Leges, Prague 2017) 400. FrumarováKateřina Správní trestání 1st edn Leges Prague 2017 400 Search in Google Scholar

Generální finanční ředitelství, ‘Dotazy a odpovědi. Odvody za porušení rozpočtové kázně’ (2013) <http://www.financnisprava.cz/cs/dane-a-pojistne/odvody-za-poruseni-rozpoctovekazne/dotazy-a-odpovedi> accessed 7 January 2018. Generální finanční ředitelství ‘Dotazy a odpovědi. Odvody za porušení rozpočtové kázně’ 2013 <http://www.financnisprava.cz/cs/dane-a-pojistne/odvody-za-poruseni-rozpoctovekazne/dotazy-a-odpovedi> accessed 7 January 2018. Search in Google Scholar

Marie Karfíková et al, Teorie finančního práva a finanční vědy (1st edn, Wolters Kluwer ČR, Prague 2017) 356. KarfíkováMarie Teorie finančního práva a finanční vědy 1st edn Wolters Kluwer ČR Prague 2017 356 Search in Google Scholar

Roman Seer and Anna Lena Wilmset al, Surcharges and Penalties in Tax Law (1st edn, IBFD, Amsterdam 2016) 854. SeerRoman WilmsAnna Lena Surcharges and Penalties in Tax Law 1st edn IBFD Amsterdam 2016 854 Search in Google Scholar

Office for the Protection of Competition: ÚOHS-R370/2014/VZ-37230/2015/321/Oho. Office for the Protection of Competition: ÚOHS-R370/2014/VZ-37230/2015/321/Oho Search in Google Scholar

Opinion of advocate general Case C-489/10 Bonda [2012] ECR. Opinion of advocate general Case C-489/10 Bonda [2012] ECR Search in Google Scholar

Supreme Administrative Court:3 As 57/2004 – 39. Supreme Administrative Court:3 As 57/2004 – 39 Search in Google Scholar

Supreme Administrative Court:1 Afs 53/2013 – 33. Supreme Administrative Court:1 Afs 53/2013 – 33 Search in Google Scholar

Supreme Administrative Court:4 Afs 210/2014 – 70. Supreme Administrative Court:4 Afs 210/2014 – 70 Search in Google Scholar