This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Act No. 218/2000 Col., on budgetary rules, as amended.Act No. 218/2000 Col., on budgetary rules, as amendedSearch in Google Scholar
Act No. 280/2009 Col., Tax Procedure Code, as amended.Act No. 280/2009 Col., Tax Procedure Code, as amendedSearch in Google Scholar
Act No. 134/2016 Col., on public procurements, as amended.Act No. 134/2016 Col., on public procurements, as amendedSearch in Google Scholar
Engel and Others v. The Netherlands App no 5100/71, 5101/71, 5102/71, 5354/72 et 5370/72 (ECHR, 8 June 1976).Engel and Others v. The NetherlandsApp no 5100/71, 5101/71, 5102/71, 5354/72 et 5370/72ECHR8June1976Search in Google Scholar
Bendenoun v. France App no 12547/86 (ECHR, 24 February 1994).Bendenoun v. FranceApp no 12547/86ECHR24February1994Search in Google Scholar
Stephen Andrew Benham v. the United Kingdom App no 19380/92 (ECHR, 29 November 1994).Stephen Andrew Benham v. the United KingdomApp no 19380/92ECHR29November1994Search in Google Scholar
Jussila v. Finland App no 73053/01 (ECHR, 23 November 2006).Jussila v. FinlandApp no 73053/01ECHR23November2006Search in Google Scholar
SergeyZolotukhin v. Russia App no 14939/03 (ECHR, 10 February 2009).SergeyZolotukhin v. RussiaApp no 14939/03ECHR10February2009Search in Google Scholar
Nicoleta Gheorghe v. Romania App no 23470/05 (ECHR, 3 April 2012).Nicoleta Gheorghe v. RomaniaApp no 23470/05ECHR3April2012Search in Google Scholar
Kapetanios and Others v. Greece App no 3453/12, 42941/12 et 9028/13 (ECHR, 30 April 2015).Kapetanios and Others v. GreeceApp no 3453/12, 42941/12 et 9028/13ECHR30April2015Search in Google Scholar
A and B v. Norway App no 24130/11 et 29758/11 (ECHR, 15 November 2016).A and B v. NorwayApp no 24130/11 et 29758/11ECHR15November201610.32964/TJ15.11Search in Google Scholar
Willem Bastiaan van Bockel, The ne bis in idem principle in EU law. A conceptual and jurisprudential analysis(1st edn, Ipskamp Drukkers, Amsterdam 2009) 308.van BockelWillem BastiaanThe ne bis in idem principle in EU law. A conceptual and jurisprudential analysis1st ednIpskamp DrukkersAmsterdam2009308Search in Google Scholar
European Court of Human Rights, ‘Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Right to a fair trial (criminal limb)’ (2014) <https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_6_criminal_ENG.pdf> accessed 7 January 2018.European Court of Human Rights‘Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Right to a fair trial (criminal limb)’2014<https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_6_criminal_ENG.pdf> accessed 7 January 2018.Search in Google Scholar
Kateřina Frumarová et al, Správní trestání (1st edn, Leges, Prague 2017) 400.FrumarováKateřinaSprávní trestání1st ednLegesPrague2017400Search in Google Scholar
Generální finanční ředitelství, ‘Dotazy a odpovědi. Odvody za porušení rozpočtové kázně’ (2013) <http://www.financnisprava.cz/cs/dane-a-pojistne/odvody-za-poruseni-rozpoctovekazne/dotazy-a-odpovedi> accessed 7 January 2018.Generální finanční ředitelství‘Dotazy a odpovědi. Odvody za porušení rozpočtové kázně’2013<http://www.financnisprava.cz/cs/dane-a-pojistne/odvody-za-poruseni-rozpoctovekazne/dotazy-a-odpovedi> accessed 7 January 2018.Search in Google Scholar
Marie Karfíková et al, Teorie finančního práva a finanční vědy (1st edn, Wolters Kluwer ČR, Prague 2017) 356.KarfíkováMarieTeorie finančního práva a finanční vědy1st ednWolters Kluwer ČRPrague2017356Search in Google Scholar
Roman Seer and Anna Lena Wilmset al, Surcharges and Penalties in Tax Law (1st edn, IBFD, Amsterdam 2016) 854.SeerRomanWilmsAnna LenaSurcharges and Penalties in Tax Law1st ednIBFDAmsterdam2016854Search in Google Scholar
Office for the Protection of Competition: ÚOHS-R370/2014/VZ-37230/2015/321/Oho.Office for the Protection of Competition: ÚOHS-R370/2014/VZ-37230/2015/321/OhoSearch in Google Scholar
Opinion of advocate general Case C-489/10 Bonda [2012] ECR.Opinion of advocate general Case C-489/10 Bonda [2012] ECRSearch in Google Scholar
Supreme Administrative Court:3 As 57/2004 – 39.Supreme Administrative Court:3 As 57/2004 – 39Search in Google Scholar
Supreme Administrative Court:1 Afs 53/2013 – 33.Supreme Administrative Court:1 Afs 53/2013 – 33Search in Google Scholar
Supreme Administrative Court:4 Afs 210/2014 – 70.Supreme Administrative Court:4 Afs 210/2014 – 70Search in Google Scholar