[Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning. Methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston: Ally and Bacon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boyle, T. (1997). Design for multimedia learning. Essex. England: Pearson Education Limited.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bos, M. (2003). Experienced teachers' expectations about the potential effectiveness of spelling exercises. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 104-127.10.1007/s11881-003-0006-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Diederen, J., Gruppen, H., Hartog, R., & Voragen, A. G. J. (2005). Design and evaluation of digital learning material to support acquisition of quantitative problem-solving skills within food chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(5/6), 495-507.10.1007/s10956-005-0224-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Herring, D. F., Notar, C. E., & Wilson, J. D. (2005). Multimedia software evaluation form for teachers. Education, 126(1), 100-111.]Search in Google Scholar
[Higgins, K. (2000). Evaluating educational software for special education. Intervention in School & Clinic, 36(2), 109-115.10.1177/105345120003600207]Search in Google Scholar
[Hughes, I. E. (1998). "Horses for courses" - categories of computer-based learning program and their uses in pharmacology courses. Information Services & Use, 18(1/2), 35-44.10.3233/ISU-1998-181-206]Search in Google Scholar
[Jacobson, E. (2006). Computer homework effectiveness in developmental mathematics. Journal of Developmental Education, 29(3), 2-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kurz, T. L., & Middleton, J. A. (2006). Using a functional approach to change pre-service teachers' understanding of mathematics software. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(1), 45-65.10.1080/15391523.2006.10782472]Search in Google Scholar
[Luik, P. (2007). Characteristics of drills related to development of skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(1), 56-68.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00201.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Luik, P. (2009). Effective characteristics of learning multimedia. In L. T. W. Hin & R. Subramaniam (Eds.), Handbook of research on new media literacy at the K-12 level: Issues and challenges (pp. 167-188). New York, London: IGI Global.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mei-Yan, L., Walker, D. F., & Huang, J. (1999). Do they look at educational multimedia differently than we do? A study of software evaluation in Taiwan and the United States. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26(1), 31-42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mikk, J., & Luik, P. (2003). Characteristics of multimedia textbook that affect post-test scores. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 19(4), 528-537.10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00055.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Ngu, B. H., & Rethinasamy, S. (2006). Evaluating a CALL software on the learning of English prepositions. Computers & Education, 47(1), 41-55.10.1016/j.compedu.2004.08.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Nurmi, S., & Lehti, S. (2003). European teachers' expectations and opinions about learning objects. Paper presented in the Symposium "Designing Virtual Learning Materials" at the EARLI 2003 Conference. August 29, 2003; Padova, Italy.]Search in Google Scholar
[Phillips, R. (1997). The developer's handbook to interactive multimedia. A practical guide for educational applications. London: Kogan Page]Search in Google Scholar
[Rana, P. K. (2002). Evaluation of Web-Based Learning Systems used in the primary education sector. Unpublished Master's thesis, Brunel University, London, United Kingdom. Retrieved May 15, 2004, from http://disc.brunel.ac.uk:8080/modres_uploads/CS5007B/ci01pkr.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Trotter, A. (1998). Teaching the basics. Education week on the web. Retrieved July 20, 2004, from http://www.edweek.org/sreports/tc98/cs/cs1.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[Van den Bergh, O., & Vrana, S. R. (1998). Repetition and boredom in a perceptual fluency/attributional model of affective judgements. Cognition and Emotion, 12(4), 533-553.10.1080/026999398379556]Search in Google Scholar
[Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M. S. (2001). Integrating technology in teaching and teacher education: Implications for policy and curriculum reform. Educational Media International, 38(2/3), 127-132.10.1080/09523980110041944]Search in Google Scholar