MR rectum imaging with ultra sound gel as instrumental contrast media in tubulovillous adenoma

Ajaj W, Lauenstein CH, Schneemann H, Knehle C, Herborn UC, Goehde CS, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing using oral and rectal stool softeners/fecal cracking/-feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 2079-87.10.1007/s00330-005-2838-2Search in Google Scholar

Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The national Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977-81.10.1056/NEJM199312303292701Search in Google Scholar

O'Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Diaz B, et al. The national polyp study: patient and polyp characteristics associated with high grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenetrology 1990; 98: 371-9.10.1016/0016-5085(90)90827-NSearch in Google Scholar

Brkic T, Grgic M. Colorectal Carcinoma. Medicus 2006; 15: 89-97.Search in Google Scholar

Blachar A, Sosna J. CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): technique, indications and performance. Digestion 2007; 76: 34-41.10.1159/00010839217947817Search in Google Scholar

Ramji A. Villous adenoma. 2006; http://www.emedicine.comSearch in Google Scholar

Roddie M. CT colonography tools advance in clinical use. Diagnostic Imaging Europe 2006; 10: 35-7Search in Google Scholar

Steine S, Stordahl A, Oclocer LK, Laeviw C. Doubl-contrast barium enema versus colonoscopy in the diagnosis of neoplastic disorders: aspects of decision-macing in general practice. Fam Pract 1993; 10: 288-91.10.1093/fampra/10.3.2888282153Search in Google Scholar

Ott DJ, Gefand DW, WuWC, Kerr RM. Sensitivity of double-contrast barium enema emphasis on polyp detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1980; 135: 327-30.10.2214/ajr.135.2.3276773336Search in Google Scholar

Geenen RW, Hussain SM, Cademartiri F, Poley JW, Siersema PD, Krestin GP. CT and MR colonography: scanning techniques, postprocessing, and emphasis on polyp detection. Radiographics 2004; 24: e18.10.1148/rg.e1814527992Search in Google Scholar

Chan TW Kressel HY, Milestone B, Tomachefski J, Schnall M, Rosato E, et al. Rectal carcinoma: staging at MRI imaging with endorectal surface coil. Work in progress. Radiology 1991; 181: 461-7.Search in Google Scholar

Goldman S, Arvidsson H, Norming U, Lagerstedt U, Magnusson I, Frisell J. Transrectal ultrasound and computed topography in preoperative staging of lower rectal carcinoma. Gastrintest Radiol 1991; 16: 259-63.10.1007/BF018873611879647Search in Google Scholar

Klessen C, Rogalla P, Taupitz M. Local staging of rectal cancer: the current role of MRI. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 379-89.10.1007/s00330-006-0388-x177962817008990Search in Google Scholar

Panaccione JL, Ros PR, Torres GM, Burton SS. Rectal barium in pelvic MR imaging: initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991; 1: 605-7.10.1002/jmri.18800105151790387Search in Google Scholar

Maier AG, Kersting-Sommerhoff B, Reeders JW, Judmaier W, Schima W, Annweiler AA, et al. Staging of rectal cancer by double-contrast MR imaging using the rectally administered super paramagnetic iron oxide contrast agent ferristene and IV gadodiamid injection: results of a multicenter phase II trial. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 651-60.10.1002/1522-2586(200011)12:5<651::AID-JMRI1>3.0.CO;2-RSearch in Google Scholar

Berman L, Israel GM, McCarthy SM, Weinreb JC, Longo WE. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in anorectal disease. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 3153-8.10.3748/wjg.v13.i23.3153Search in Google Scholar

Fletcher JG, Busse RF, Riederer SJ, Harigh D, Gluecker T, Harper CM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of anatomic ad dynamic defects of the pelvic floor in defecatory disorders. Am J Gastroeneterology 2003; 98: 399-411.10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07235.xSearch in Google Scholar

Halligan S. Dynamic pelvic MRI. Imaging 2001; 13: 458-61.10.1259/img.13.6.130458Search in Google Scholar