[Ajaj W, Lauenstein CH, Schneemann H, Knehle C, Herborn UC, Goehde CS, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing using oral and rectal stool softeners/fecal cracking/-feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 2079-87.10.1007/s00330-005-2838-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The national Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977-81.10.1056/NEJM199312303292701]Search in Google Scholar
[O'Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Diaz B, et al. The national polyp study: patient and polyp characteristics associated with high grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenetrology 1990; 98: 371-9.10.1016/0016-5085(90)90827-N]Search in Google Scholar
[Brkic T, Grgic M. Colorectal Carcinoma. Medicus 2006; 15: 89-97.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blachar A, Sosna J. CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): technique, indications and performance. Digestion 2007; 76: 34-41.10.1159/00010839217947817]Search in Google Scholar
[Ramji A. Villous adenoma. 2006; http://www.emedicine.com]Search in Google Scholar
[Roddie M. CT colonography tools advance in clinical use. Diagnostic Imaging Europe 2006; 10: 35-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Steine S, Stordahl A, Oclocer LK, Laeviw C. Doubl-contrast barium enema versus colonoscopy in the diagnosis of neoplastic disorders: aspects of decision-macing in general practice. Fam Pract 1993; 10: 288-91.10.1093/fampra/10.3.2888282153]Search in Google Scholar
[Ott DJ, Gefand DW, WuWC, Kerr RM. Sensitivity of double-contrast barium enema emphasis on polyp detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1980; 135: 327-30.10.2214/ajr.135.2.3276773336]Search in Google Scholar
[Geenen RW, Hussain SM, Cademartiri F, Poley JW, Siersema PD, Krestin GP. CT and MR colonography: scanning techniques, postprocessing, and emphasis on polyp detection. Radiographics 2004; 24: e18.10.1148/rg.e1814527992]Search in Google Scholar
[Chan TW Kressel HY, Milestone B, Tomachefski J, Schnall M, Rosato E, et al. Rectal carcinoma: staging at MRI imaging with endorectal surface coil. Work in progress. Radiology 1991; 181: 461-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goldman S, Arvidsson H, Norming U, Lagerstedt U, Magnusson I, Frisell J. Transrectal ultrasound and computed topography in preoperative staging of lower rectal carcinoma. Gastrintest Radiol 1991; 16: 259-63.10.1007/BF018873611879647]Search in Google Scholar
[Klessen C, Rogalla P, Taupitz M. Local staging of rectal cancer: the current role of MRI. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 379-89.10.1007/s00330-006-0388-x177962817008990]Search in Google Scholar
[Panaccione JL, Ros PR, Torres GM, Burton SS. Rectal barium in pelvic MR imaging: initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991; 1: 605-7.10.1002/jmri.18800105151790387]Search in Google Scholar
[Maier AG, Kersting-Sommerhoff B, Reeders JW, Judmaier W, Schima W, Annweiler AA, et al. Staging of rectal cancer by double-contrast MR imaging using the rectally administered super paramagnetic iron oxide contrast agent ferristene and IV gadodiamid injection: results of a multicenter phase II trial. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 651-60.10.1002/1522-2586(200011)12:5<651::AID-JMRI1>3.0.CO;2-R]Search in Google Scholar
[Berman L, Israel GM, McCarthy SM, Weinreb JC, Longo WE. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in anorectal disease. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 3153-8.10.3748/wjg.v13.i23.3153]Search in Google Scholar
[Fletcher JG, Busse RF, Riederer SJ, Harigh D, Gluecker T, Harper CM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of anatomic ad dynamic defects of the pelvic floor in defecatory disorders. Am J Gastroeneterology 2003; 98: 399-411.10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07235.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Halligan S. Dynamic pelvic MRI. Imaging 2001; 13: 458-61.10.1259/img.13.6.130458]Search in Google Scholar