Some Approaches to the Rolling Wheels’ Dynamics Modelling in the Weight-in-Motion Problem

1. Jacob B., Feypell-de la Beaumelle, V. (2010). Improving truck safety: Potential of weigh-in-motion technology. IATSS Research, 34, 9-15.10.1016/j.iatssr.2010.06.003Search in Google Scholar

2. Shengyao Jia et al. (2010). Signal acquisition and processing of the moving vehicle weighting system. WSEAS Trans. on Signal Proc., 3(6), 113-122.Search in Google Scholar

3. Dorleus J. et al. (2009). A fibre optic seismic sensor for unattended ground sensing applications. ITEA Journ., 30, 455-460.Search in Google Scholar

4. Mimbela, L. E. Y., Klein, L. A. (2005). Summary of vehicle detection and surveillance technologiesused in intelligent transportation systems. New Mexico: New Mexico State University.Search in Google Scholar

5. Mazurek, B. et al. (2001). Assessment of vehicle weight measurement method using PVDF transducers. J. of Electrostatics, 51-52, 76-81.10.1016/S0304-3886(01)00043-2Search in Google Scholar

6. US Dept. of Commerce. (1997). Development of fibre optic dynamic WIM systems. Final Report. USA: Nat. Techn. Inf. Service.Search in Google Scholar

7. Sheriff, R E., Geldart, L. P. (1985). Exploration seismology, V. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Search in Google Scholar

8. Tatom, F. B., Herndon, G. W. (Feb. 2004). US Pat. No 6,692,567 B1. USA.Search in Google Scholar

9. Tarasik, V. P. (2006). Theory of automobile motion. Saint-Petersburg: BHW. (In Russian)Search in Google Scholar

10. Osinovskaya, V. A. (2006). About evaluation and prediction of automobile road vibrations. (In Russian), Retrieved 2006, from http://science-bsea.narod.ru/2006/story2006/osinovskaya_vopros.htmSearch in Google Scholar

11. Mimbela, L.-E. Y., Pate, J., Copeland, S., Kent, P. M., Hamrick, J. (April 2003). Applications of Fibre Optic Sensors in Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) Systems for monitoring truck weights on pavements and structures. Final report on research project. New Mexico State University.Search in Google Scholar

12. Levin, M. A., Fufayev, N. A. (1989). Theory of deformable rolling wheels. Moscow: Science. (In Russian)Search in Google Scholar

13. Moazami, D., Muniandy, R., Hamid, H., Md.Yusoff, Z. (2011). Effect of tire footprint area in pavement response studies. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 6(21), 5040-5047.Search in Google Scholar

14. Balabin, I. V. (Ed.) (1985). Automotive and tractor wheels: Handbook. Moscow: Mashinostroenie. (In Russian)Search in Google Scholar

15. Fernando, E. G., Musani, D., Dae-Wook, P., and Liu, W. (2006). Evaluation of Effects of Tire Sizeand Inflation Pressure on Tire Contact Stresses and Pavement Response. Project 0-4361. Texas, USA: Transportation Institute, College Station.Search in Google Scholar

16. Smith, N. D. (2004). Understanding Parameters Influencing Tire Modelling. Colorado, USA: Colorado State University. Formula SAE Platform.Search in Google Scholar

17. Batenko, A., Grakovski, A., Kabashkin, I., Petersons, E., Sikerzhicki, Y. (2011). Weight-in-Motion (WIM) Measurements by Fiber Optic Sensor: Problems and Solutions. Transport and Telecommunication, 12(4), 27-33.Search in Google Scholar

18. Peters, B., Koniditsiotis, C. (2000). Weigh-In-Motion Technology, Intermediate Report, ©Austroads Inc., No. AP-R168/00. Burwood Highway, Australia: ARRB Transport Research Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

19. Loo van, F. J. (2001). Project WIM-Hand, 1st interim report, DWW-Publication: IB-R-01-09, Road and Hydraulic Engineering Institute, DG Rijkswaterstaat.Search in Google Scholar

20. Bushman, Rob, Pratt, Andrew J. (2002). Weigh In Motion Technology - Economics and Performance. In Proc. of NATMEC ’02. Charlotte. North Carolina: Warren Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

21. Giallorenzi, T. G., Bucaro, J. A., Dandridge, A., Siegel, G. II., Jr., Cole, J. II., Rashleighand, S. C., Priest, R. G. (1982). Optical Fiber Sensor Technology. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, QE-18, pp. 626-665.10.1109/JQE.1982.1071566Search in Google Scholar

22. Scheuter, F. (1997). General Guide for Weighing with Portable Wheel Load Scales: HAENNI, Document P 1196. Maryland, Baltimore: Interscience Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

23. Taylor, B., Klashinsky, R. (1995). New Application for Weigh-In-Motion Technology. TrafficTechnology International. Surrey, England: UK & International Press.Search in Google Scholar

24. Sivuhin, D. (2005). General Physics Course. In Vol. I, Mechanics, 4th Edition (560 p.). Moscow: FIZMALIT; MFTI Publ. (In Russian)Search in Google Scholar

25. Widrow, B., Stearns, S. (1989). Adaptive Signal Processing. Moscow: Radio and Svjaz. (In Russian)Search in Google Scholar

26. Shakun, P., Sikerzhicky, Y. (2012). Adaptive method’s applications for the identification systems in dynamic weighing. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference “Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication” (RelStat’12), 17-20 October 2012 (pp. 296-306). Riga, Latvia: TTI.Search in Google Scholar

27. Malla, Ramesh B., Sen, Amlan, Garrick, Norman W. (2008). A Special Fiber Optic Sensor for Measuring Wheel Loads of Vehicles on Highways. Sensors, 8, 2551-2568. Retrieved April 4, 2008, from MDPI database on the World Wide Web: http:// www.mdpi.org/sensors10.3390/s8042551367343127879835Search in Google Scholar

28. SENSORLINE GmbH. (2010). SPT Short Feeder Spliceless Fiber Optic Traffic Sensor: productdescription. Sensor line, GmbH. Retrieved January 7, 2011, from http://sensorline.de/home/pages/downloads.phpSearch in Google Scholar

29. O’Brien, E. J., Jacob, B. (1998). European Specification on Vehicle Weigh-in-Motion of Road Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Weigh-in-Motion of Road Vehicles, 1998 (pp. 171-183). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Search in Google Scholar

30. Mesco, A. (1984) Digital Filtering: Applications in Geophysical Exploration for Oil, v. 1-2. Budapest: Academiai Kiado. Search in Google Scholar