[1. Jacob B., Feypell-de la Beaumelle, V. (2010). Improving truck safety: Potential of weigh-in-motion technology. IATSS Research, 34, 9-15.10.1016/j.iatssr.2010.06.003]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Shengyao Jia et al. (2010). Signal acquisition and processing of the moving vehicle weighting system. WSEAS Trans. on Signal Proc., 3(6), 113-122.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Dorleus J. et al. (2009). A fibre optic seismic sensor for unattended ground sensing applications. ITEA Journ., 30, 455-460.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Mimbela, L. E. Y., Klein, L. A. (2005). Summary of vehicle detection and surveillance technologiesused in intelligent transportation systems. New Mexico: New Mexico State University.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Mazurek, B. et al. (2001). Assessment of vehicle weight measurement method using PVDF transducers. J. of Electrostatics, 51-52, 76-81.10.1016/S0304-3886(01)00043-2]Search in Google Scholar
[6. US Dept. of Commerce. (1997). Development of fibre optic dynamic WIM systems. Final Report. USA: Nat. Techn. Inf. Service.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Sheriff, R E., Geldart, L. P. (1985). Exploration seismology, V. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Tatom, F. B., Herndon, G. W. (Feb. 2004). US Pat. No 6,692,567 B1. USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Tarasik, V. P. (2006). Theory of automobile motion. Saint-Petersburg: BHW. (In Russian)]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Osinovskaya, V. A. (2006). About evaluation and prediction of automobile road vibrations. (In Russian), Retrieved 2006, from http://science-bsea.narod.ru/2006/story2006/osinovskaya_vopros.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Mimbela, L.-E. Y., Pate, J., Copeland, S., Kent, P. M., Hamrick, J. (April 2003). Applications of Fibre Optic Sensors in Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) Systems for monitoring truck weights on pavements and structures. Final report on research project. New Mexico State University.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Levin, M. A., Fufayev, N. A. (1989). Theory of deformable rolling wheels. Moscow: Science. (In Russian)]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Moazami, D., Muniandy, R., Hamid, H., Md.Yusoff, Z. (2011). Effect of tire footprint area in pavement response studies. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 6(21), 5040-5047.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Balabin, I. V. (Ed.) (1985). Automotive and tractor wheels: Handbook. Moscow: Mashinostroenie. (In Russian)]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Fernando, E. G., Musani, D., Dae-Wook, P., and Liu, W. (2006). Evaluation of Effects of Tire Sizeand Inflation Pressure on Tire Contact Stresses and Pavement Response. Project 0-4361. Texas, USA: Transportation Institute, College Station.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Smith, N. D. (2004). Understanding Parameters Influencing Tire Modelling. Colorado, USA: Colorado State University. Formula SAE Platform.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Batenko, A., Grakovski, A., Kabashkin, I., Petersons, E., Sikerzhicki, Y. (2011). Weight-in-Motion (WIM) Measurements by Fiber Optic Sensor: Problems and Solutions. Transport and Telecommunication, 12(4), 27-33.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Peters, B., Koniditsiotis, C. (2000). Weigh-In-Motion Technology, Intermediate Report, ©Austroads Inc., No. AP-R168/00. Burwood Highway, Australia: ARRB Transport Research Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Loo van, F. J. (2001). Project WIM-Hand, 1st interim report, DWW-Publication: IB-R-01-09, Road and Hydraulic Engineering Institute, DG Rijkswaterstaat.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Bushman, Rob, Pratt, Andrew J. (2002). Weigh In Motion Technology - Economics and Performance. In Proc. of NATMEC ’02. Charlotte. North Carolina: Warren Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Giallorenzi, T. G., Bucaro, J. A., Dandridge, A., Siegel, G. II., Jr., Cole, J. II., Rashleighand, S. C., Priest, R. G. (1982). Optical Fiber Sensor Technology. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, QE-18, pp. 626-665.10.1109/JQE.1982.1071566]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Scheuter, F. (1997). General Guide for Weighing with Portable Wheel Load Scales: HAENNI, Document P 1196. Maryland, Baltimore: Interscience Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Taylor, B., Klashinsky, R. (1995). New Application for Weigh-In-Motion Technology. TrafficTechnology International. Surrey, England: UK & International Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Sivuhin, D. (2005). General Physics Course. In Vol. I, Mechanics, 4th Edition (560 p.). Moscow: FIZMALIT; MFTI Publ. (In Russian)]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Widrow, B., Stearns, S. (1989). Adaptive Signal Processing. Moscow: Radio and Svjaz. (In Russian)]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Shakun, P., Sikerzhicky, Y. (2012). Adaptive method’s applications for the identification systems in dynamic weighing. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference “Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication” (RelStat’12), 17-20 October 2012 (pp. 296-306). Riga, Latvia: TTI.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Malla, Ramesh B., Sen, Amlan, Garrick, Norman W. (2008). A Special Fiber Optic Sensor for Measuring Wheel Loads of Vehicles on Highways. Sensors, 8, 2551-2568. Retrieved April 4, 2008, from MDPI database on the World Wide Web: http:// www.mdpi.org/sensors10.3390/s8042551367343127879835]Search in Google Scholar
[28. SENSORLINE GmbH. (2010). SPT Short Feeder Spliceless Fiber Optic Traffic Sensor: productdescription. Sensor line, GmbH. Retrieved January 7, 2011, from http://sensorline.de/home/pages/downloads.php]Search in Google Scholar
[29. O’Brien, E. J., Jacob, B. (1998). European Specification on Vehicle Weigh-in-Motion of Road Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Weigh-in-Motion of Road Vehicles, 1998 (pp. 171-183). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Mesco, A. (1984) Digital Filtering: Applications in Geophysical Exploration for Oil, v. 1-2. Budapest: Academiai Kiado. ]Search in Google Scholar