[
Alahuhta, J., Toivanen, M. & Hjort, J. 2019. Geodiversity–biodiversity relationship needs more empirical evidence. – Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4: 2-3.10.1038/s41559-019-1051-731745262
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Allen, T.F.H. & Starr, T.B. 1982. Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity. – University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Allen, T.F.H. & Hoekstra, T. W. 1992. Toward a unified ecology. – Columbia University Press, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Almås, R., Gjerdåker, B., Lunden, K., Myhre, B. & Øye, I. 2004. Norwegian agricultural history. – Tapir, Trondheim.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anonymous 2000. European landscape convention. Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anonymous, 2009. Act of 19 June 2009 No. 100 Relating to the Management of Biological, eo-logical and Landscape Diversity (Norwegian Nature Diversity Act). – Norwegian ministry of environment, Oslo.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Antrop, M. 2004. Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. – Landsc. Urban Plan. 67: 9-26.10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00026-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Austin, M.P. 1985. Continuum concept, ordination methods, and niche theory. – Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 39-61.10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.000351
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Austin, M.P. 2002. Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. – Ecol. Model. 157: 101-118.10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00205-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bailey, R.G. 2009. Ecosystem Geography: From Ecoregions to Sites. – Springer, New York.10.1007/978-0-387-89516-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bailey, R.G. 2014. Ecoregions: The Ecosystem Geography of the Oceans and Continents. – Springer, New York.10.1007/978-1-4939-0524-9_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bakkestuen, V., Erikstad, L. & Halvorsen, R. 2008. Step-less models for regional environmental variation in Norway. – J. Biogeogr. 35: 1906–1922.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01941.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barth, A. 1944. Skogskjøtsel på biologisk grunnlag. – Grøndahl & Søn Forlag, Oslo.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Birks, H.J.B. 1993. Quaternary paleoecology and vegetation science - current contributions and possible future-developments. – Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 79: 153-177.10.1016/0034-6667(93)90045-V
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blanchet, F.G., Legendre, P. & Borcard, D. 2008. Forward selection of explanatory variables. – Ecology 89: 2623–2632.10.1890/07-0986.118831183
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bouttier, J., Di Fransesco, P. & Guitter, E. 2003. Geodesic distance in planar graphs. – Nucl. Phys. Ser. B 663: 535–567.10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00355-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brabyn, L. 2005. Solutions for characterising natural landscapes in New Zealand using geographical information systems. – J. Environ. Manage. 76: 23-34.10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.01.00515854734
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bray, J.R. & Curtis, J.T. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. – Ecol. Monogr. 27: 327–349.10.2307/1942268
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bryn, A., Dourojeanni, P., Hemsing, L. Ø. & O’Donnell, S. 2013. A high-resolution GIS null model of potential forest expansion following land use changes in Norway. – Scand. J. For. Res. 28: 81-98.10.1080/02827581.2012.689005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bryn, A., Strand, G.H., Angeloff, M. & Rekdal, Y. 2018. Land cover in Norway based on an area frame survey of vegetation types. – Norsk Geogr. Tidsskr. 72: 131–145.10.1080/00291951.2018.1468356
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bunce, R.G.H., Barr, C. J., Clarke, R.T., Howard, D.C. & Lane, A.M. J. 1996. Special Paper: ITE Merlewood Land Classification of Great Britain. – J. Biogeogr. 23: 625-634.10.1111/j.1365-2699.1996.tb00023.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chuman, T. & Romportl, D. 2010. Multivariate classification analysis of cultural landscapes: An example from the Czech Republic. – Landsc. Urban Plann. 98: 200-209.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Curtis, J.T. 1959. The vegetation of Wisconsin; an ordination of plant communities. –University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cushman S.A., Gutzweiler K., Evans J.S., McGarigal K. (2010) The Gradient Paradigm: A Conceptual and Analytical Framework for Landscape Ecology. – In: Cushman S.A., Huettmann F. (eds) Spatial Complexity, Informatics, and Wildlife Conservation. Springer, Tokyo, pp- 83–108.10.1007/978-4-431-87771-4_5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Czekanowski, J. 1909. Zur differential Diagose der Neandertalgruppe. – Korrespondenzbl. dt. Ges. Anthrop. 40: 44–47.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dawkins, R. 1986. The blind watchmaker. – Longman Scientific & Technical, Essex.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De’ath, G. 1999. Extended dissimilarity: a method of robust estimation of ecological distances from high beta diversity data. – Pl. Ecol. 144: 191–199.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Delcourt, H.R., Delcourt, P.A. & Webb, T. 1982. Dynamic plant ecology: the spectrum of vegetational change in space and time. – Quaternary Science Reviews 1: 153-175.10.1016/0277-3791(82)90008-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Delcourt, H.R. & Delcourt, P.A. 1988. Quaternary landscape ecology: Relevant scales in space and time. – Landsc. Ecol. 2: 23-44.10.1007/BF00138906
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dikau, R. 1989. The application of a digital relief model to landform analysis in geomorphology. – In Raper, J.F. (ed), Three dimensional applications in geographical information systems, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 51-77.10.1201/9781003069454-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dikau, R., Brabb, E.E. & Mark, R.M. 1991. Landform classification of New Mexico by computer. US Dept. of the Interior, US Geological Survey.10.3133/ofr91634
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Einevoll, O. 1965. Nytten av eit økonomisk kartverk. – In: Løddesøl, A. (ed) Meddelelser fra Det norske myrselskap. Mariendals boktrykkeri, Gjøvik.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, E.C., Goldewijk, K.K., Siebert, S., Lightman, D. & Ramankutty, N. 2010. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. – Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 19: 589-606.10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00540.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Emanuelsson, U. 2009. The rural landscapes of Europe: how man has shaped European nature. – Formas, Stockholm.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Erikstad, L., Halvorsen, R., Moen, A., Thorsnes T., Andersen, T., Blom, H.H., Elvebakk, A., Elven, R., Gaarder, G., Mortensen, P.B., Norderhaug, A., Nygaard, K., Ødegaard, F. 2009. Landformvariasjon (terrengformvariasjon og landformer). Naturtyper i Norge. Bakgrunnsdokument 14: 1-91.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Erikstad, L., Blumentrath, S., Bakkestuen, V. & Halvorsen, R. 2013. Landskapstypekartlegging som verktøy til overvåking av arealbruksendringer. Norsk Inst. Naturforsk. Rapp 1006: 1-41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Erikstad, L., Uttakleiv, L.A. & Halvorsen, R. 2015. Characterisation and mapping of landscape types, a case study from Norway. – Belg. J. Geogr. 3: 1-15.10.4000/belgeo.17412
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Estes, L., Elsen, P.R., Treuer, T., Ahmed, L., Caylor, K., Chang, J., Choi, J.J. and Ellis, E.C. 2018. The spatial and temporal domains of modern ecology. – Nat. Ecol. Evol.10.1038/s41559-018-0524-429610472
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fairclough, G. & Herring, P. 2016. Lens, mirror, window: interactions between Historic Land-scape Characterisation and Landscape Character Assessment. – Landsc. Res. 41: 186-198.10.1080/01426397.2015.1135318
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fjellstad, W.J., & Dramstad, W.E. 1999.. Patterns of change in two contrasting Norwegian agricultural landscapes. – Landsc. Urban Plan. 45: 177–191.10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00055-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forman, R.T.T. & Godron, M. 1986. Landscape ecology. – Wiley, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fotheringham, A.S. & Wong, D.W.S. 1991. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem in Multivariate Statistical Analysis. – Environ.Plan. A – Economy and Space 23: 1025-1044.10.1068/a231025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gehlke, C.E. & Biel, K. 1934. Certain effects of grouping upon the size of the correlation coefficient in census tract material. – J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 29: 169-170.10.1080/01621459.1934.10506247
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gelman, A. & Hennig, C. 2017. Beyond subjective and objective in statistics. – J. R. Stat. Soc. 180: 967-1033.10.1111/rssa.12276
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gjessing, J. 1977. Norges geografi. – Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gjessing, J. 1978. Norges landformer. – Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gjærevoll, O. 1973. Plantegeografi. – Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gleason, H.A. 1939. The Individualistic Concept of the Plant Association. – Am. Midl. Nat. 21: 92-110.10.2307/2420377
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glømme, H. 1935. Forelesninger i jordbunnslære. – Norges Landbrukshøiskole. Ås.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halvorsen, R., (Ed.), (2015). Grunnlag for typeinndeling av natursystem-nivået i NiN – analyser av generaliserte artslistedatasett. Natur i Norge (NiN) Artikkel, 2 (Version 2.0.2), 1–283.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halvorsen, R., Bryn, A. & Erikstad, L. 2016. NiNs systemkjerne – teori, prinsipper og inndelingskriterier. – Natur i Norge, Artikkel 1 (versjon 2.1.0): 1–358. Artsdatabanken, Trondheim.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halvorsen, R., Skarpaas, O., Bryn, A., Bratli, H., Erikstad, L., Simensen, T. & Eriksen, E.L. 2020. Towards a systematics of ecodiversity: The EcoSyst framework. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 29: 1887-1906.10.1111/geb.13164
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hammond, E. H. 1954. Small-Scale Continental Landform Maps. – Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 44: 33-42.10.1080/00045605409352120
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hansen, L. I., & Olsen, B. 2004. Samenes historie fram til 1750 – Cappelen akademisk forlag, Oslo.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hesselbarth, M.H.K., Sciaini, M., With, K.A., Wiegand, K. & Nowosad, J. 2019. landscapemetrics: an open-source R tool to calculate landscape metrics. – Ecography 42: 1648-1657.10.1111/ecog.04617
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hill, M.O. 1979. DECORANA—A FORTRAN Program for Detrended Correspondence Analysis and Reciprocal Averaging. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hill, M.O. 1979. TWINSPAN: a FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individual and attributes. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hill, M.O. & Gauch, H.G. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. – Vegetatio, 42, 11.10.1007/BF00048870
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holt-Jensen, A. 2009. Geography. History and Concepts: A Student´s Guide. – Sage Publications LTD, London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ives, A.R. & Carpenter, S.R. 2007. Stability and Diversity of Ecosystems. – Science 317: 58-62.10.1126/science.113325817615333
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jakobsson, S., Bakkestuen, V., Barton, D.N., Lindhjem, H. & Magnussen, K. 2020. Utredning av tilgjengelige og relevante datagrunnlag for kategorisering av naturareal. Norsk Inst. Naturforsk. Rapp 1767: 1–48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jasiewicz, J. & Stepinski, T.F. 2013. Geomorphons — a pattern recognition approach to classification and mapping of landforms. – Geomorphology 182: 147-156.10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.11.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jelinski, D.E. & Wu, J.G. 1996. The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. – Landsc. Ecol. 11: 129-140.10.1007/BF02447512
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jacobsen, H., & Follum J.-R. 2008. Kulturminner i Norge. Tun Forlag, Oslo
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karagulle, D., Frye, C., Sayre, R., Breyer, S., Aniello, P., Vaughan, R. & Wright, D. 2017. Modeling global Hammond landform regions from 250-m elevation data. – Trans. GIS 21: 1040-1060.10.1111/tgis.12265
]Search in Google Scholar
[
King, A.W. 2005. Hierarchy theory and the landscape … level? or, Words do matter. – In: J.A. Wiens & M.R. Moss (eds), Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 29-35.10.1017/CBO9780511614415.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klemsdal, T. 1982. Coastal classification and the coast of Norway. – Norsk Geogr. Tidsskr. 36: 129-152.10.1080/00291958208552078
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kruskal, J.B. 1964a. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. – Psychometrika 29: 115–129.10.1007/BF02289694
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kruskal, J.B. 1964b. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. – Psychometrika, 29: 1–27.10.1007/BF02289565
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krøgli, S., Fjellstad, W., Heggem, E., Dramstad, W., Eiter, S. & Puschmann, O. 2015. Landskap i ruter – et fleksibelt system for landskapsanalyser. – Kart og Plan 4: 328-341.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lausch, A., Blaschke, T., Haase, D., Herzog, F., Syrbe, R.-U., Tischendorf, L. & Walz, U. 2015. Understanding and quantifying landscape structure – A review on relevant process characteristics, data models and landscape metrics. – Ecol. Model. 295: 31-41.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Legendre, P. & Legendre, L.F.J. 2012. Numerical Ecology, 3rd ed. – Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lomolino, M.V., Riddle, B.R. & Whittaker, R.J. 2017. Biogeography: biological diversity across space and time. – Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lovelace, R., Nowosad, J. & Muenchow, J. 2019. Geocomputation with R: CRC Press, New Jersey.10.1201/9780203730058
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Luck, M. & Wu, J. 2002. A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. – Landsc. Ecol. 17: 327-339.10.1023/A:1020512723753
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MacQueen, J. 1967. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. – In [redaktører] (eds), Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Statistics, University of California Press, Berkeley CA, pp. 281–297.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mahecha, M.D., Martinez, A., Lischeid, G. & Beck, E. 2007. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction: Alternative ordination approaches for extracting and visualizing biodiversity patterns in tropical montane forest vegetation data. – Ecol. Inform. 2: 138–149.10.1016/j.ecoinf.2007.05.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Malinowska, E. & Szumacher, I. 2013. Application of landscape metrics in the evaluation of geodiversity. – Misc. Geogr. 17: 28–33.10.2478/v10288-012-0045-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marsh, W.M. 2005. Landscape planning: Environmental applications. – John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mattsson, J.O., Behrens, S., Bergsten, K.E., Helldén, U., Hillefors, Å., Rapp, A. and Åkermann, J. 1984. Terrängformer i Norden. – Nordiska Ministerrådet, Arlöv.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGarigal, K. & Cushman, S.A. 2005. The gradient concept of landscape structure. – In: J.A. Wiens & M.R. Moss (eds), Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press, pp. 112-119.10.1017/CBO9780511614415.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGill, B.J. 2010a. Matters of Scale. – Science 328: 575-576.10.1126/science.118852820431001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGill, B.J. 2010b. Towards a unification of unified theories of biodiversity. – Ecol. Lett. 13: 627-642.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01449.x20337695
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McHarg, I.L. 1969. Design with nature. – American Museum of Natural History, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McIntosh, R.P. 1967. The continuum concept of vegetation. – Bot. Rev. 33: 130-187.10.1007/BF02858667
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Minchin, P.R. 1989. Montane vegetation of the Mt. Field massif, Tasmania: a test of some hypotheses about properties of community patterns. – Vegetatio, 83(1), 97–110.10.1007/BF00031683
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moen, A. 1999. National atlas of Norway: Vegetation. Norwegian Mapping Authority, Hønefoss.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moeslund, J.E., Arge, L., Bøcher, P.K., Dalgaard, T. & Svenning, J.-C. 2013. Topography as a driver of local terrestrial vascular plant diversity patterns. – Nord. J. Bot. 31: 129-144.10.1111/j.1756-1051.2013.00082.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nordhagen, R. 1917. Planteveksten paa Froøene og nærliggende øer: bidrag til kundskapen om naturforholdene i Norges skjærgaard. – Det Kongelige Norske Videnskabers Selskap Skrifter 8-1916, Trondheim.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Noss, R.F. 1990. Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach. – Conserv. Biol. 4: 355-364.10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., Minchin, P.R., Hara, R.B.O., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H.H., Szoecs, E. and Wagner, H. 2016. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Neill, R.V., Deangelis, D.L., Waide, J.B., Allen, T.F. & Allen, G.E. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. – Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
R Core Team. 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. In. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paine, R.T. 1969. A note on trophic complexity and community stability. –Am. Nat. 103: 91-93.10.1086/282586
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pereira, H.M., Ferrier, S., Walters, M., Geller, G.N., Jongman, R.H.G., Scholes, R.J., Bruford, M.W., Brummitt, N., Butchart, S.H.M., Cardoso, A.C., Coops, N.C., Dulloo, E., Faith, D.P., Freyhof, J., Gregory, R.D., Heip, C., Höft, R., Hurtt, G., Jetz, W., Karp, D.S., McGeoch, M.A., Obura, D., Onoda, Y., Pettorelli, N., Reyers, B., Sayre, R., Scharlemann, J.P.W., Stuart, S.N., Turak, E., Walpole, M. and Wegmann, M. 2013. Essential Biodiversity Variables. – Science 339: 277-278.10.1126/science.122993123329036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phillips, J.D. 2007. The perfect landscape. – Geomorphology 84: 159-169.10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.01.039
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pike, R.J., Evans, I. and Hengl, T. 2009. Geomorphometry: a brief guide. – Dev. in Soil Sci. 33: 3-30.10.1016/S0166-2481(08)00001-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Puschmann, O. 2005. Nasjonalt referansesystem for landskap: beskrivelse av Norges 45 land-skapsregioner. – Norsk Inst. Jord- Skogkartlegging Rapp. 10:2005.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ramberg, I.B., Bryhni, I., Nøttvedt, A. & Rangnes, K. (eds). 2008. The making of a land - Geology of Norway. – Geological Society of Norway, Trondheim.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rao, C. R. 1964. The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhyā: – Indian J. Stat., Series A, 329–358.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ratajczak, Z., Carpenter, S.R., Ives, A.R., Kucharik, C.J., Ramiadantsoa, T., Stegner, M.A., Williams, J.W., Zhang, J. and Turner, M.G. 2018. Abrupt Change in Ecological Systems: Inference and Diagnosis. – Trends Ecol. Evol. 33: 513-526.10.1016/j.tree.2018.04.01329784428
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reusch, H.H. 1894. Strandflaten, et nyt trek i Norges Geografi. – Norges geologiske undersøkelse 14: 1-14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reusch, H. 1905. Norges geografi. – T.O. Brøgger, Kristiania.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ripple, W.J., Estes, J.A., Schmitz, O.J., Constant, V., Kaylor, M.J., Lenz, A., Motley, J.L., Self, K.E., Taylor, D.S. and Wolf, C. 2016. What is a trophic cascade? – Trends Ecol. Evol. 31: 842-849.10.1016/j.tree.2016.08.01027663836
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rudberg, S. 1960. Geography of Norden. – In: A. Sømme (ed) Cappelen, Oslo, pp. 27–40.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sanderson, E.W., Jaiteh, M., Levy, M.A., Redford, K.H., Wannebo, A.V. & Woolmer, G. 2002. The Human Footprint and the Last of the Wild: The human footprint is a global map of human influence on the land surface, which suggests that human beings are stewards of nature, whether we like it or not. – Bioscience 52: 891-904.10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0891:THFATL]2.0.CO;2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sayre, R., Dangermond, J., Frye, C., Vaughan, R., Aniello, P., Breyer, S., Cribbs, D., Hopkins, D., Nauman, R., Derrenbacher, W., Wright, D., Brown, C., Convis, C., Smith, J., Benson, L., Paco VanSistine, D., Warner, H., Cress, J., Danielson, J., Hamann, S., Cecere, T., Reddy, A., Burton, D., Grosse, A., True, D., Metzger, M., Hartmann, J., Moosdorf, N., Dürr, H., Paganini, M., De-Fourny, P., Arino, O., Maynard, S., Anderson, M. and Comer, P. 2014. A New Map of Global Ecological Land Units - An Ecophysiographic Stratification Approach. – Association of American Geographers, Washington, DC.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sayre, R., Karagulle, D., Frye, C., Boucher, T., Wolff, N.H., Breyer, S., Wright, D., Martin, M., Butler, K., Van Graafeiland, K., Touval, J., Sotomayor, L., McGowan, J., Game, E.T. and Possingham, H. 2019. An assessment of the representation of ecosystems in global protected areas using new maps of World Climate Regions and World Ecosystems. – Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 21: e0086010.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00860
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schrodt, F., Santos, M.J., Bailey, J.J. & Field, R. 2019. Challenges and opportunities for biogeography—What can we still learn from von Humboldt? – J. Biogeogr. 46: 1631-1642.10.1111/jbi.13616
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simensen, T., Halvorsen, R. & Erikstad, L. 2018. Methods for landscape characterisation and mapping: A systematic review. – Land Use Policy 75: 557-569.10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simensen, T., Erikstad, L., & Halvorsen, R. (2021). Diversity and distribution of landscape types in Norway. Norsk Geogr. Tidsskr. 75: 79-100.10.1080/00291951.2021.1892177
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simensen, T., Horvath, P., Vollering, J., Erikstad, L., Halvorsen, R., Bryn, A. 2020. Composite landscape predictors improve distribution models of ecosystem types. Divers Distrib. 00: 1–16.10.1111/ddi.13060
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simpson, G.G. 1945. The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. – Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 85: 1:349.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Skånes, H.M. 1997. Towards an integrated ecological–geographical landscape perspective. A review of principal concepts and methods. – Norsk Geogr. Tidsskr. 51: 145-171.10.1080/00291959708545892
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Son, T. C. v. & Halvorsen, R. 2014. Multiple Parallel Ordinations: the Importance of Choice of Ordination Method and Weighting of Species Abundance Data. Sommerfeltia, 37: 1–37.10.2478/som-2014-0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strand, G.H. 2011. Uncertainty in classification and delineation of landscapes: A probabilistic approach to landscape modeling. – Environ. Model. Software 26: 1150-1157.10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.03.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sulebak, J.R. & Sjøstrøm, K.H. 2007. Landformer og prosesser: en innføring i naturgeografiske tema. – Fagbokforlaget, Bergen.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swan, J.M.A. 1970. An examination of some ordination problems by use of simulated vegetation data. – Ecology 51: 89–102.10.2307/1933602
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swanson, F.J., Kratz, T. K., Caine, N. & Woodmansee, R. G. 1988. Landform Effects on Ecosystem Patterns and Processes. – Bioscience 38: 92-98.10.2307/1310614
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sømme, A. 1938. Notiser Og Litteraturanmeldelser. – Norsk Geogr. Tidsskr. 7: 178-181.10.1080/00291953808551605
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ter Braak, C.J. 1985. Correspondence analysis of incidence and abundance data: properties in terms of a unimodal response model. – Biometrics, 41: 859–873.10.2307/2530959
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tilman, D. & Kareiva, P. 2018. Spatial ecology: the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions (MPB-30). – Princeton University Press, New Jersey.10.2307/j.ctv36zpzm
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trømborg, D. 2006. Geologi og landformer i Norge. – Landbruksforlaget, Oslo.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tuomikoski, R. 1942. Untersuchungen über die Untervegetation der Bruchmoore in Ostfinnland I. Zur Methodik der pflanzensoziologischen Systematik. Annls bot. Soc. zool.-bot. fenn. Vanamo 17: 1: 1-203.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, M.G. 2010. Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world1. – Ecology 91: 2833-2849.10.1890/10-0097.121058545
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, M.G. & Gardner, R.H. 2015. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. – Springer, New York.10.1007/978-1-4939-2794-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Urban, D.L., O’Neill, R.V. & Shugart, H.H. 1987. Landscape Ecology. A hierarchical perspective can help scientists understand spatial patterns. – Bioscience 37: 119-127.10.2307/1310366
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Eetvelde, V. & Antrop, M. 2009. A stepwise multi-scaled landscape typology and characterisation for trans-regional integration, applied on the federal state of Belgium. – Landsc. Urban Plan. 91: 160-170.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Elsas, J.D., Trevors, J.T., Jansson, J.K. & Nannipieri, P. 2006. Modern soil microbiology. – CRC press, Boca Raton, Florida.10.1201/9781420015201
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Groenendael, J., Ehrlén, J. & Svensson, B. M. 2000. Dispersal and Persistence: Population Processes and Community Dynamics. – Folia Geobot. 35: 107-114.10.1007/BF02803090
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Son, T.C. & Halvorsen, R. 2014. Multiple parallel ordination and data manipulation: the importance of weighting species abundance data – Sommerfeltia 37: 1–37.10.2478/som-2014-0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vitousek, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Lubchenco, J. & Melillo, J.M. 1997. Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems. – Science 277: 494.10.1126/science.277.5325.494
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vizzari, M., Hilal, M., Sigura, M., Antognelli, S. & Joly, D. 2018. Urban-rural-natural gradient analysis with CORINE data: An application to the metropolitan France. – Landsc. Urban Plan. 171: 18-29.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Whittaker, R.H. 1952. A study of summer foliage insect communities in the Great Smoky Mountains. – Ecol. Monogr. 22: 1–44.10.2307/1948527
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Whittaker, R.H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. – Ecol. Monogr. 26: 1-80.10.2307/1943577
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Whittaker, R.H. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. – Ecol. Monogr. 30: 279-338.10.2307/1943563
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Whittaker, R.H. 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. – Biol. Rev. 42: 207-264.10.1111/j.1469-185X.1967.tb01419.x4859903
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wiens, J.A. 1989. Spatial Scaling in Ecology. – Funct. Ecol. 3: 385-397.10.2307/2389612
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williamson, M.H. 1978. The ordination of incidence data. – J. Ecol. 66: 911–920.10.2307/2259303
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Winsnes, T., Sørensen, R., Bakkelid, S., Torp, B., Kristiansen, K.J. & Sollid, J.L. 1983. Nasjonalatlas for Norge: hovedtema 2: Landformer, berggrunn og løsmasser. – Statens kartverk, Hønefoss.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xu, C., Kohler, T.A., Lenton, T.M., Svenning, J.C. & Scheffer, M. 2020. Future of the human climate niche. – Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117: 11350–11355.10.1073/pnas.1910114117726094932366654
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yang, D., Gao, C., Li, L. & van Eetvelde, V. 2020. Multi-scaled identification of landscape character types and areas in Lushan National Park and its fringes, China. – Landscape Urban Plann. 201: 103844.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103844
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zarnetske, P.L., Read, Q.D., Record, S., Gaddis, K.D., Pau, S., Hobi, M.L., Malone, S.L., Costanza, J., M. Dahlin, K., Latimer, A.M., Wilson, A.M., Grady, J.M., Ollinger, S.V. and Finley, A.O. 2019. Towards connecting biodiversity and geodiversity across scales with satellite remote sensing. – Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 28: 548-556.10.1111/geb.12887655916131217748
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Økland, R.H. & Bendiksen, E. 1985. The vegetation of of the forest-alpine transition in the Grunningsdalen area, Telemark, SE Norway. – Sommerfeltia 2: 1-224.10.2478/som-1985-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Økland, R.H. 1990. Vegetation ecology: theory, methods and applications with reference to Fennoscandia. – Sommerfeltia Suppl. 1: 1–233.10.2478/som-1990-0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Økland, R.H. & Eilertsen, O. 1993. Vegetation-environment relationships of boreal coniferous forests in the Solhomfjell area, Gjerstad, S Norway. – Sommerfeltia 16: 1-254.10.2478/som-1993-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Økland, R.H. 1986. Rescaling of ecological gradients. I. Calculation of ecological distance between vegetation stands by means of their floristic composition. – Nord. J. Bot. 6: 651–660.10.1111/j.1756-1051.1986.tb00464.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Økland, R.H. 1996. Are ordination and constrained ordination alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies? – J. Veg. Sci. 7: 289–292.10.2307/3236330
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Økland, R.H. 2007. Wise use of statistical tools in ecological field studies. – Folia geobot. 42: 123–140.10.1007/BF02893879
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Økland, R.H., Økland, T. & Rydgren, K. 2001. A Scandinavian perspective on ecological gradients in north-west European mires: reply to Wheeler and Proctor. – J. Ecol. 89: 481–486.10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00573.x
]Search in Google Scholar