Phronetic Ethics in Social Robotics: A New Approach to Building Ethical Robots

Aamodt, A., & Plaza, E. (1994). Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications, 7(1), 39–59.10.3233/AIC-1994-7104Search in Google Scholar

Alaieri, F., & Vellino, A. (2016). Ethical decision making in robots: Autonomy, trust and responsibility. In A. Agah, J. J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, & H. He (Eds.), Social Robotics (Vol. 9979, pp. 159–168). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_1610.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_16Search in Google Scholar

Albrecht, S. V., & Stone, P. (2018). Autonomous agents modelling other agents: A comprehensive survey and open problems. Artificial Intelligence, 258, 66–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.01.00210.1016/j.artint.2018.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Allen, C., Wallach, W., & Smit, I. (2006). Why Machine Ethics? IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(4), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.8310.1109/MIS.2006.83Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2008). ETHEL: Toward a Principled Ethical EldercareRobot. In M. Skubic (Ed.), AI in Eldercare: New Solutions to Old Problems: Papers from the AAAI Fall Symposium. Menlo Park, California: AAAI Press.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2011). Machine Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511978036Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2014). GenEth: General Ethical Dilemma Analyzer. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 253–261). Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261871702_GenEth_A_General_Ethical_Dilemma_Analyzer10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8737Search in Google Scholar

Arkin, R. C., & Ulam, P. (2009). An Ethical Adaptor: Behavioral Modification Derived from Moral Emotions. Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: http://www.cc.gatech.edu/ai/robot-lab/online-publications/ArkinUlamTechReport2009.pdf10.1109/CIRA.2009.5423177Search in Google Scholar

Bard, G. V. (2007). Spelling-error tolerant, order-independent pass-phrases via the damerau-levenshtein string-edit distance metric. Proceedings of the Fifth Australasian Symposium on ACSW Frontiers – Volume 68, 117–124. Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1274531.1274545Search in Google Scholar

Broadie, S. (1991). Ethics with Aristotle. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bostrom, N. 2003. Cognitive, Emotive and Ethical Aspects of Decision Making in Humans and in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2, ed. I. Smith et al., International Institute of Advanced Studies in Systems Research and Cybernetics (pp. 12–17) [revised version available at https://nickbostrom.com/ethics/ai.html].Search in Google Scholar

Cave, S., Nyrup, R., Vold, K., & Weller, A. (2019). Motivations and Risks of Machine Ethics. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(3), 562–574. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2018.286599610.1109/JPROC.2018.2865996Search in Google Scholar

Cole, D. (2019). The Chinese Room Argument. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019). Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/chinese-room/Search in Google Scholar

Devlin, K. (1991). Logic and Information. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament. (2017, February 16). Civil Law Rules on Robotics European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Floridi, L., Sanders, J. W. (2004). On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines, 14(3), 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9dSearch in Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again (S. Sampson, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gilleland, M. (2006). Levenshtein Distance, in Three Flavors. Retrieved December 3, 2019 from https://people.cs.pitt.edu/~kirk/cs1501/Pruhs/Spring2006/assignments/editdistance/Levenshtein%20Distance.htmSearch in Google Scholar

Graham, G. (2017). Behaviorism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017). Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/behaviorism/Search in Google Scholar

Hasna, O. L., & Potolea, R. (2016). The longest common subsequence distance using a complexity factor. Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, 336–343. https://doi.org/10.5220/000606760336034310.5220/0006067603360343Search in Google Scholar

Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of Natural Science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Hibbard, B. (2015). Ethical Artificial Intelligence. ArXiv:1411.1373 [Cs]. Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.1373.Search in Google Scholar

Jaro, M. A. (1989). Advances in record-linkage methodology as applied to matching the 1985 census of Tampa, Florida. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(406), 414–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1989.1047878510.1080/01621459.1989.10478785Search in Google Scholar

Leite, I., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A. (2013). Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(2), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0178-y10.1007/s12369-013-0178-ySearch in Google Scholar

Navarro, G. (2001). A guided tour to approximate string matching. ACM Computing Surveys, 33(1), 31–88. https://doi.org/10.1145/375360.37536510.1145/375360.375365Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, P. (2016). One autonomous car will use 4,000 GB of data per day. Network World. Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: https://www.networkworld.com/article/3147892/one-autonomous-car-will-use-4000-gb-of-dataday.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Oers, R. van, & Wesselman, E. (2016). Social Robots. Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/06/social-robots.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Polak, P., & Krzanowski, R. (2020). Ethics in autonomous robots as philosophy in silico: The study case of phronetic machine ethics. Logos i Ethos, 54, 33–48.10.15633/lie.3576Search in Google Scholar

Poole, D. L., & Mackworth, A. K. (2017). Artificial Intelligence: Foundations of Computational Agents (2nd edition). Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: https://artint.info/2e/html/ArtInt2e.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Prestes, E., Carbonera, J. L., Rama Fiorini, S., M. Jorge, V. A., Abel, M., Madhavan, R., ... & Schlenoff, C. (2013). Towards a core ontology for robotics and automation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 61(11), 1193–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2013.04.00510.1016/j.robot.2013.04.005Search in Google Scholar

Randall, J. H. (1965). Aristotle (4th ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reeve, C. D. C. (1992). Practices of Reason: Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Richter, M. M., & Weber, R. (2013). Case-Based Reasoning: A Textbook. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40167-110.1007/978-3-642-40167-1Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1998). Mind, Language and Society: Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Tarleton, N. (2010). Coherent Extrapolated Volition: A Meta-Level Approach to Machine Ethics. San Francisco, CA: The Singularity Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Tenorth, M., & Beetz, M. (2017). Representations for robot knowledge in the KnowRob framework. Artificial Intelligence, 247, 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2015.05.01010.1016/j.artint.2015.05.010Search in Google Scholar

Väyrynen, P. (2017). Thick Ethical Concepts. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/thick-ethical-concepts/Search in Google Scholar

Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2009). Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374049.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wallach, W., Allen, C., & Smit, I. (2008). Machine morality: Bottom-up and top-down approaches for modelling human moral faculties. AI & SOCIETY, 22(4), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0099-010.1007/s00146-007-0099-0Search in Google Scholar

Wallach, W., Franklin, S., & Allen, C. (2010). A conceptual and computational model of moral decision making in human and artificial agents. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 454–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01095.x10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01095.xSearch in Google Scholar

Winkler, W. E. (1990). String Comparator Metrics and Enhanced Decision Rules in the Fellegi-Sunter Model of Record Linkage. 354–359.Search in Google Scholar

Yudkowsky, E. (2004). Coherent Extrapolated Volition. San Francisco, CA: The Singularity InstituteSearch in Google Scholar