[Aamodt, A., & Plaza, E. (1994). Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications, 7(1), 39–59.10.3233/AIC-1994-7104]Search in Google Scholar
[Alaieri, F., & Vellino, A. (2016). Ethical decision making in robots: Autonomy, trust and responsibility. In A. Agah, J. J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, & H. He (Eds.), Social Robotics (Vol. 9979, pp. 159–168). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_1610.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_16]Search in Google Scholar
[Albrecht, S. V., & Stone, P. (2018). Autonomous agents modelling other agents: A comprehensive survey and open problems. Artificial Intelligence, 258, 66–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.01.00210.1016/j.artint.2018.01.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Allen, C., Wallach, W., & Smit, I. (2006). Why Machine Ethics? IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(4), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.8310.1109/MIS.2006.83]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2008). ETHEL: Toward a Principled Ethical EldercareRobot. In M. Skubic (Ed.), AI in Eldercare: New Solutions to Old Problems: Papers from the AAAI Fall Symposium. Menlo Park, California: AAAI Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2011). Machine Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511978036]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2014). GenEth: General Ethical Dilemma Analyzer. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 253–261). Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261871702_GenEth_A_General_Ethical_Dilemma_Analyzer10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8737]Search in Google Scholar
[Arkin, R. C., & Ulam, P. (2009). An Ethical Adaptor: Behavioral Modification Derived from Moral Emotions. Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: http://www.cc.gatech.edu/ai/robot-lab/online-publications/ArkinUlamTechReport2009.pdf10.1109/CIRA.2009.5423177]Search in Google Scholar
[Bard, G. V. (2007). Spelling-error tolerant, order-independent pass-phrases via the damerau-levenshtein string-edit distance metric. Proceedings of the Fifth Australasian Symposium on ACSW Frontiers – Volume 68, 117–124. Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1274531.1274545]Search in Google Scholar
[Broadie, S. (1991). Ethics with Aristotle. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bostrom, N. 2003. Cognitive, Emotive and Ethical Aspects of Decision Making in Humans and in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2, ed. I. Smith et al., International Institute of Advanced Studies in Systems Research and Cybernetics (pp. 12–17) [revised version available at https://nickbostrom.com/ethics/ai.html].]Search in Google Scholar
[Cave, S., Nyrup, R., Vold, K., & Weller, A. (2019). Motivations and Risks of Machine Ethics. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(3), 562–574. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2018.286599610.1109/JPROC.2018.2865996]Search in Google Scholar
[Cole, D. (2019). The Chinese Room Argument. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019). Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/chinese-room/]Search in Google Scholar
[Devlin, K. (1991). Logic and Information. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Parliament. (2017, February 16). Civil Law Rules on Robotics European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Floridi, L., Sanders, J. W. (2004). On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines, 14(3), 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d]Search in Google Scholar
[Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again (S. Sampson, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gilleland, M. (2006). Levenshtein Distance, in Three Flavors. Retrieved December 3, 2019 from https://people.cs.pitt.edu/~kirk/cs1501/Pruhs/Spring2006/assignments/editdistance/Levenshtein%20Distance.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[Graham, G. (2017). Behaviorism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017). Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/behaviorism/]Search in Google Scholar
[Hasna, O. L., & Potolea, R. (2016). The longest common subsequence distance using a complexity factor. Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, 336–343. https://doi.org/10.5220/000606760336034310.5220/0006067603360343]Search in Google Scholar
[Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of Natural Science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hibbard, B. (2015). Ethical Artificial Intelligence. ArXiv:1411.1373 [Cs]. Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.1373.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaro, M. A. (1989). Advances in record-linkage methodology as applied to matching the 1985 census of Tampa, Florida. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(406), 414–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1989.1047878510.1080/01621459.1989.10478785]Search in Google Scholar
[Leite, I., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A. (2013). Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(2), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0178-y10.1007/s12369-013-0178-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Navarro, G. (2001). A guided tour to approximate string matching. ACM Computing Surveys, 33(1), 31–88. https://doi.org/10.1145/375360.37536510.1145/375360.375365]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelson, P. (2016). One autonomous car will use 4,000 GB of data per day. Network World. Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: https://www.networkworld.com/article/3147892/one-autonomous-car-will-use-4000-gb-of-dataday.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Oers, R. van, & Wesselman, E. (2016). Social Robots. Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/06/social-robots.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Polak, P., & Krzanowski, R. (2020). Ethics in autonomous robots as philosophy in silico: The study case of phronetic machine ethics. Logos i Ethos, 54, 33–48.10.15633/lie.3576]Search in Google Scholar
[Poole, D. L., & Mackworth, A. K. (2017). Artificial Intelligence: Foundations of Computational Agents (2nd edition). Retrieved January 10, 2020 from: https://artint.info/2e/html/ArtInt2e.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Prestes, E., Carbonera, J. L., Rama Fiorini, S., M. Jorge, V. A., Abel, M., Madhavan, R., ... & Schlenoff, C. (2013). Towards a core ontology for robotics and automation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 61(11), 1193–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2013.04.00510.1016/j.robot.2013.04.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Randall, J. H. (1965). Aristotle (4th ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reeve, C. D. C. (1992). Practices of Reason: Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Richter, M. M., & Weber, R. (2013). Case-Based Reasoning: A Textbook. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40167-110.1007/978-3-642-40167-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Searle, J. R. (1998). Mind, Language and Society: Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tarleton, N. (2010). Coherent Extrapolated Volition: A Meta-Level Approach to Machine Ethics. San Francisco, CA: The Singularity Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tenorth, M., & Beetz, M. (2017). Representations for robot knowledge in the KnowRob framework. Artificial Intelligence, 247, 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2015.05.01010.1016/j.artint.2015.05.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Väyrynen, P. (2017). Thick Ethical Concepts. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/thick-ethical-concepts/]Search in Google Scholar
[Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2009). Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374049.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Wallach, W., Allen, C., & Smit, I. (2008). Machine morality: Bottom-up and top-down approaches for modelling human moral faculties. AI & SOCIETY, 22(4), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0099-010.1007/s00146-007-0099-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Wallach, W., Franklin, S., & Allen, C. (2010). A conceptual and computational model of moral decision making in human and artificial agents. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 454–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01095.x10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01095.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Winkler, W. E. (1990). String Comparator Metrics and Enhanced Decision Rules in the Fellegi-Sunter Model of Record Linkage. 354–359.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yudkowsky, E. (2004). Coherent Extrapolated Volition. San Francisco, CA: The Singularity Institute]Search in Google Scholar