Login
Registrati
Reimposta password
Pubblica & Distribuisci
Soluzioni Editoriali
Soluzioni di Distribuzione
Temi
Architettura e design
Arti
Business e Economia
Chimica
Chimica industriale
Farmacia
Filosofia
Fisica
Geoscienze
Ingegneria
Interesse generale
Legge
Letteratura
Linguistica e semiotica
Matematica
Medicina
Musica
Scienze bibliotecarie e dell'informazione, studi library
Scienze dei materiali
Scienze della vita
Scienze informatiche
Scienze sociali
Sport e tempo libero
Storia
Studi classici e del Vicino Oriente antico
Studi culturali
Studi ebraici
Teologia e religione
Pubblicazioni
Riviste
Libri
Atti
Editori
Blog
Contatti
Cerca
EUR
USD
GBP
Italiano
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrello
Home
Riviste
Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
Volume 45 (2023): Numero 3 (September 2023)
Accesso libero
Compressive and Tensile Strength of Nano-clay Stabilised Soil Subjected to Repeated Freeze–Thaw Cycles
Mahya Roustaei
Mahya Roustaei
,
Mahdi Sabetraftar
Mahdi Sabetraftar
,
Ehsan Taherabadi
Ehsan Taherabadi
e
Meysam Bayat
Meysam Bayat
| 01 set 2023
Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
Volume 45 (2023): Numero 3 (September 2023)
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Sommario
Articolo
Immagini e tabelle
Bibliografia
Autori
Articoli in questo Numero
Anteprima
PDF
Cita
CONDIVIDI
Article Category:
Original Study
Pubblicato online:
01 set 2023
Pagine:
221 - 230
Ricevuto:
22 ott 2022
Accettato:
13 mag 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2023-0009
Parole chiave
Nano-clay
,
Compressive Strength
,
Tensile Strength
,
Freeze–Thaw Cycles
© 2023 Mahya Roustaei et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1:
Grain size distribution curves of soil.
Figure 2:
Influence of nano-clay on the (a) compaction curve of clay and (b) normalised maximum dry unit weight and normalised optimum moisture content.
Figure 3:
UCS stress–strain curves of specimens without any freeze–thaw cycles (a), curing time = 0 days (b) curing time = 7 days and (c) curing time = 28 days.
Figure 4:
Unconfined compressive strength of specimens without any freeze–thaw cycles.
Figure 5:
Tensile strength of specimens without any freeze–thaw cycles.
Figure 6:
UCS stress–strain curves of specimens subjected to freeze–thaw cycles: (a) nano-clay content = 0%, (b) nano-clay content = 0.5%, (c) nano-clay content = 1%, (d) nano-clay content = 1.5%, (e) nano-clay content = 2%, (f) nano-clay content = 3%.
Figure 7:
Normalised unconfined compressive strength of the specimens versus number of freeze–thaw cycles: (a) curing time = 0 day, (b) curing time = 7 days, (c) curing time = 28 days.
Figure 8:
Normalised ultimate tensile strength of specimens versus number of freeze–thaw cycles: (a) curing time = 0 day, (b) curing time = 7 days, (c) curing time = 28 days.
Properties of nano-clay particles.
Parameter
Typical dry particle sizes
γ
d
(g/cm
3
)
G
s
90% less than
50% less than
10% less than
Value
10 μm
6 μm
2 μm
1.98
1.6
Geotechnical properties of clayey soil.
Parameter
Liquid limit (LL) (%)
Plastic limit (PL) (%)
Plastic index (PI) (%)
G
s
Value
36
20
16
2.757
Summary of the test's details.
Test group
Nano-clay content (%)
No. of freeze–thaw cycles
Curing time (days)
No. of tests
Group 1
0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 3
0
0, 7 and 28
15 UCS
†
, 15 STS
‡
Group 2
0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 3
0, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 11
0, 7 and 28
90 UCS; 90 STS