Connexion
S'inscrire
Réinitialiser le mot de passe
Publier & Distribuer
Solutions d'édition
Solutions de distribution
Thèmes
Architecture et design
Arts
Business et économie
Chimie
Chimie industrielle
Droit
Géosciences
Histoire
Informatique
Ingénierie
Intérêt général
Linguistique et sémiotique
Littérature
Mathématiques
Musique
Médecine
Pharmacie
Philosophie
Physique
Sciences bibliothécaires et de l'information, études du livre
Sciences des matériaux
Sciences du vivant
Sciences sociales
Sport et loisirs
Théologie et religion
Études classiques et du Proche-Orient ancient
Études culturelles
Études juives
Publications
Journaux
Livres
Comptes-rendus
Éditeurs
Blog
Contact
Chercher
EUR
USD
GBP
Français
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Panier
Home
Journaux
Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
Édition 45 (2023): Edition 3 (September 2023)
Accès libre
Compressive and Tensile Strength of Nano-clay Stabilised Soil Subjected to Repeated Freeze–Thaw Cycles
Mahya Roustaei
Mahya Roustaei
,
Mahdi Sabetraftar
Mahdi Sabetraftar
,
Ehsan Taherabadi
Ehsan Taherabadi
et
Meysam Bayat
Meysam Bayat
| 01 sept. 2023
Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
Édition 45 (2023): Edition 3 (September 2023)
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Résumé
Article
Figures et tableaux
Références
Auteurs
Articles dans cette édition
Aperçu
PDF
Citez
Partagez
Article Category:
Original Study
Publié en ligne:
01 sept. 2023
Pages:
221 - 230
Reçu:
22 oct. 2022
Accepté:
13 mai 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2023-0009
Mots clés
Nano-clay
,
Compressive Strength
,
Tensile Strength
,
Freeze–Thaw Cycles
© 2023 Mahya Roustaei et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1:
Grain size distribution curves of soil.
Figure 2:
Influence of nano-clay on the (a) compaction curve of clay and (b) normalised maximum dry unit weight and normalised optimum moisture content.
Figure 3:
UCS stress–strain curves of specimens without any freeze–thaw cycles (a), curing time = 0 days (b) curing time = 7 days and (c) curing time = 28 days.
Figure 4:
Unconfined compressive strength of specimens without any freeze–thaw cycles.
Figure 5:
Tensile strength of specimens without any freeze–thaw cycles.
Figure 6:
UCS stress–strain curves of specimens subjected to freeze–thaw cycles: (a) nano-clay content = 0%, (b) nano-clay content = 0.5%, (c) nano-clay content = 1%, (d) nano-clay content = 1.5%, (e) nano-clay content = 2%, (f) nano-clay content = 3%.
Figure 7:
Normalised unconfined compressive strength of the specimens versus number of freeze–thaw cycles: (a) curing time = 0 day, (b) curing time = 7 days, (c) curing time = 28 days.
Figure 8:
Normalised ultimate tensile strength of specimens versus number of freeze–thaw cycles: (a) curing time = 0 day, (b) curing time = 7 days, (c) curing time = 28 days.
Properties of nano-clay particles.
Parameter
Typical dry particle sizes
γ
d
(g/cm
3
)
G
s
90% less than
50% less than
10% less than
Value
10 μm
6 μm
2 μm
1.98
1.6
Geotechnical properties of clayey soil.
Parameter
Liquid limit (LL) (%)
Plastic limit (PL) (%)
Plastic index (PI) (%)
G
s
Value
36
20
16
2.757
Summary of the test's details.
Test group
Nano-clay content (%)
No. of freeze–thaw cycles
Curing time (days)
No. of tests
Group 1
0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 3
0
0, 7 and 28
15 UCS
†
, 15 STS
‡
Group 2
0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 3
0, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 11
0, 7 and 28
90 UCS; 90 STS