[
Abraham A, Mathew PM (1966) Cytology of Encephalartos hildebrandtii A. Br. & Bouche. Annals of Botany 30: 239–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a08407110.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084071
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Adams R (2014) Junipers of the World: The Genus Juniperus. Bloomington, IN: Trafford Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Adams KL, Wendel JF (2005) Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 8: 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2005.01.00110.1016/j.pbi.2005.01.00115752992
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Adams RP, Schwarzbach AE, Tashev AN (2016) Chloroplast capture by a new variety, Juniperus sabina var. balkanensis RP Adams and AN Tashev, from the Balkan Peninsula: A putative stabilized relictual hybrid between J. sabina and ancestral J. thurifera. Phytologia 98: 100-111.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Adams RP, Johnson ST, Anderson J, Rushforth K, Farhat P, Valentin N, Siljak-Yakovlev S (2019) The origin of Juniperus xpfitzeriana, an allotetraploid hybrid of J. chinensis X J. sabina. Phytologia 101: 164-174.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ahuja MR (2005) Polyploidy in gymnosperms revisited. Silvae Genetica 54: 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2005-001010.1515/sg-2005-0010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ahuja MR (2009) Genetic constitution and diversity in four narrow endemic redwoods from the family Cupressaceae. Euphytica 165: 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9813-310.1007/s10681-008-9813-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ahuja MR, Neale DB (2002) Origins of polyploidy in coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) (D. Don) Endl. and relationship of coast redwood to other genera of Taxodiaceae. Silvae Genetica 51: 93–100.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amborella Genome Project (2013) The Amborella genome and the evolution of flowering plants. Science 342: 1241089.10.1126/science.124108924357323
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Avanzi S, Cionini PJ (1971) A DNA cytometric investigation on the development of the female gametophyte of Ginkgo biloba. Caryologia 24: 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1971.1079641810.1080/00087114.1971.10796418
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barow M, Meister A (2003) Endopolyploidy in seed plants is differently correlated to systematics, organ, life strategy and genome size. Plant, Cell and Environment 26; 571–584. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00988.x10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00988.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beug HJ (1956) Pollendimorphismus bei Ephedra. Naturwissenschaften 43: 332-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0062940210.1007/BF00629402
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bianco P, Medagli P, D‘Emericos S (1988) Numericromosomici per la flora italiana: 1136-1138. Inform. Bot. Ital., 19 : 319-321.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blanc G, Wolfe KH (2004) Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell 16:1667–1678. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.02134510.1105/tpc.02134551415215208399
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bowe LM, Coat G, de Pamphilis CW (2000) Phylogeny of seed plants based on all three genomic compartments: Extant gymnosperms are monophyletic and Gnetales’ closest relatives are conifers. Proc Natl Acad Sciences (USA). 97: 4092-4097. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.8.409210.1073/pnas.97.8.40921815910760278
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bowers JE, Chapman BA, Rong JK, Paterson AH (2003) Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature 422:433–438. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0152110.1038/nature0152112660784
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bretagnolle F, Thompson JD (1995) Tansley Review No. 78. Gametes with the stomatic chromosome number: Mechanisms of their formation and role in the evolution of autopolyploid plants. New Phytol.129: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb03005.x10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb03005.x33874422
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brownfield L, Kohler C (2011) Unreduced gamete formation in plants: mechanism and prospects. Journal of Experimental Botany 62: 1659-1668. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq37110.1093/jxb/erq37121109579
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buck R, Hyasat S, Hossfeld A, Flores-RenteríaL (2020) Patterns of hybridization and cryptic introgression among one- and four-needled pinyon pines. Annals of Botany 126: 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaa04510.1093/aob/mcaa045742473832222765
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carta A, Bedini G, Peruzzi L (2020) A deep dive into the ancestral chromosome number and genome size of flowering plants. New Phytologist 228:1097-1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.1666810.1111/nph.1666832421860
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chaturvedi M (1978) Pollen grains in Ephedra helvetica C.A.Mey. Current Science 47: 66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chaw SM, Parkinson CL, Cheng Y, Vincent TM, Palmer JD (2000) Seed plant phylogeny inferred from all three plant genomes: Monophyly of extant gymnosperms and origin of Gnetales from conifers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA). 97: 4086-4091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.8.408610.1073/pnas.97.8.40861815710760277
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chiba S (1951) Triploids and tetraploids of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D.Don.) selected in forest nursery. Bull. Govt. For. Expt. Sta. No. 49, 99-108.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chiba S, Watanabe M(1952) Tetraploids of Larix kaempferi in the Nurseries. Bull Gov For Exp Sta. No. 57, Tokyo, 187–199.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chouhdry AS (1984) Karyomorphological and cytological studies in Ephedra. J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ., Ser. B, 19: 57–109.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chouhdry AS, Tanaka R (1981) Diploid form of Ephedra intermedia var. tibetica. Chromosome Inf. Serv. 31:3-4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christiansen H (1950) A tetraploid of Larix decidua Miller.Det.Kgl. DanskeVidenk. Selsk. 18: 1-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christenhusz MJM, Reveal JL, Farjon A, Gardner MF, Mill RR, Chase MW (2011) A new classification and linear sequence of extant gymnosperms. Phytotaxa 19: 55-70. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.19.1.310.11646/phytotaxa.19.1.3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Critchfield WB (1975) Interspecific hybridization in Pinus: a summary review. In: Fowler DP, Yeatman CY eds. Symposium on Interspecific and Interprovenance Hybridization in Forest Trees. Proceedings of the14th Meeting of the Canadian Tree Improvement Association, Part II, 99–105.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Critchfield WB (1986) Hybridization and classification of the white pines (Pinus section Strobus). Taxon 35: 647–656. https://doi.org/10.2307/122160610.2307/1221606
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Colombo P, Marceno C (1990) Númeroscromosomáticos de plantasoccidentales. 539-550. Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 47: 167–174.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Comai L (2005) The advantages and disadvantages of being a polyploid. Nature Review Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg171110.1038/nrg171116304599
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Contreras RN (2012) A simple chromosome doubling technique is effective for three species of Cupressaceae. HortScience 47: 712-714. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.47.6.71210.21273/HORTSCI.47.6.712
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Contreras RN, Ruter JM, Schwartz BM (2010) Oryzaline induced tetraploidy in Cryptomeria japonica (Cupressaceae). HortScience 45: 316-319. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.45.2.31610.21273/HORTSCI.45.2.316
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cui L, Wall PK, Leebens-Mack JH et al. (2006) Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants. Genome Research 16: 738-749. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.482560610.1101/gr.4825606147985916702410
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cutler HC (1939) Monograph of the North American species of the genus Ephedra. Annals of Missouri Botanic Garden 26: 373-428. https://doi.org/10.2307/239429910.2307/2394299
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De La Torre AR, Li Z, Van de Peer Y, Ingvarsson PK (2017) Contrasting rates of molecular evolution and patterns of selection among gymnosperms and flowering plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34:1363–1377. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx06910.1093/molbev/msx069543508528333233
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Luc A, Adams RA, Zhong M (1999) Using random amplification of polymorphic DNA for a taxonomic reevaluation of Pfitzer Juniperus. Hort-Science34:1123–1125. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.34.6.112310.21273/HORTSCI.34.6.1123
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dehal P, Boore JL (2005) Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. Plos Biology 3: e314. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.003031410.1371/journal.pbio.0030314119728516128622
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Delevoryas T (1980) Polyploidy in gymnosperms. In: Polyploidy-Biological Relevance. Lewis W.H. (Ed.). Plenum Press, New York, pp. 215-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3069-1_1210.1007/978-1-4613-3069-1_12550825
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Douhovnikoff V, Dodd RS (2011) Lineage Divergence in Coast Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), detected by a New Set of Nuclear Microsatellite Loci. Am. Midl. Nat. 165:22–37. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-165.1.2210.1674/0003-0031-165.1.22
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Drewry A (1988) G banded karyotype in Pinus resinosa Ait. Silvae Genetica 37: 218-221.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
El Maataoui M, Pichot C (1999) Nuclear and cell fusion cause polyploidy in the megagametophyte of common cypress, Cupressus sempervirens L. Planta 208: 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425005056810.1007/s004250050568
]Search in Google Scholar
[
El Maataoui M, Pichot C (2001) Microsporogenesis in endangered species Cupressus dupreziana A. Camus: evidence for meiotic defects yielding unreduced and abortive pollen. Planta 213: 543-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425010053110.1007/s00425010053111556786
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Evans GE, Rasmussen HP (1971) Chromosome counts in three cultivars of Juniperus L. Botanical Gazette 132:259-262. https://doi.org/10.1086/33658910.1086/336589
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fagerlind F (1941) Bau und Entwicklung der Gnetum-Gametophyten. Kongl. Svenska Vetensk. Akad. Handl. 19, 1–55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farhat P, Hidalgo O, Robert T, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Leitch I, Adams RP, Daghar Kharrat MB (2019a) Polyploidy in the genus Juniperus: and unexpectedly high rate. Frontiers in Plant Science 10: Article 676. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.0067610.3389/fpls.2019.00676654100631191584
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farhat P, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Adams RP, DagharKharrat MB, Robert T (2019b) Genome size variation and polyploidy in the geographical range of Juniperus sabina L. (Cupressaceae). Botany Letters. https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2019.1613262.10.1080/23818107.2019.1613262
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farhat P, Takvorian N, Avramidou M, Garraud L, Adams RP, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Daghar Kharrat MB, Robert T (2020a) First evidence for allotriploid hybrids between Juniperus thurifera and J. sabina in a sympatric area in the French Alps. Annals of Forest Science 77: 93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-00969-710.1007/s13595-020-00969-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farhat P, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Valentin N, Fabregat C, Lopez-Udias S, Salazar-Mendiaz C, Altarejos J, Adams RP (2020b) Gene flow between diploid and tetraploid junipers-two contrasting evolutionary pathways in two Juniperus populations. BMC Evolutionary Biology 20: 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-020-01688-310.1186/s12862-020-01688-3765018233167862
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farjon A (2005) A monograph of Cupressaceae and Sciadopitys. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Kew.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fawcett JA, Maere S, VandePeer Y (2009) Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous Tertiary extinction event. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences USA 106: 5737–5742. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.090090610610.1073/pnas.0900906106266702519325131
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fernandes A (1936) Sur la caryologie de Welwitschia mirabilis Hook. Biol.Soc. Broteriana 11: 267-282.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Florin R (1932) Die Chromosomenzahlen bei Welwitschia und einigen Ephedra. Arten.Svensk Bot.Tidsk 26: 205-214.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foster CB, Afonin SA (2005) Abnormal pollen grains: an outcome of deteriorating atmospheric conditions around the Permian–Triassic boundary. Journal of the Geological Society 162, 653–659. https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764904-04710.1144/0016-764904-047
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fournier G, Pages N, Fournier C, Callan G (1991) Comparisons of volatile leaf essential oils of various Juniper pfitzeriana. Pharmaciea Acta Helvetica 66: 74-75.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fozdar BS, Libby WJ (1968) Chromosomes of Sequoia sempervirens; 8-hydroxyquinoline-castor oil pretreatment for improving preparation. Stain Technol. 43: 97-100. https://doi.org/10.3109/1052029680911505010.3109/105202968091150504870872
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldblatt P (1984) Index to Plant Chromosome Numbers, 1979-1981. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 8: 1–427.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gorelick R, Olson K (2011) Is lack of cycad (Cycadales) diversity a result of a lack of polyploidy? Botanical J. Linn.Soc. 165:156-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01103.x10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01103.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guan R, Zhao Y, Zhang H, Fan G, Liu X et al. (2016) Draft genome of the living fossil Ginkgo biloba. GigaScience 5:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13742-016-0154-110.1186/s13742-016-0154-1511889927871309
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gurzenkov NN (1973) Studies of chromosome numbers in plants from the south of the Soviet far east. Komarov Lectures 20: 47-61 (in Russian).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair JB (1968) The chromosomes of the Cupressaceae. 1. Tetraclineae and Actinostrobeae (Callitroideae). New Zealand Journal of Botany 6: 272-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825x.1968.1042881310.1080/0028825X.1968.10428813
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hall M, Mukherjee A, Webster R (1973) Chromosome counts in cultivated Junipers. Journal of Arnold Arboretum 54: 369-376.10.5962/p.184526
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hall M, Mukherjee A, Crowley WR (1979) Chromosome numbers of cultivated junipers. Botanical Gazette 140: 364-370. https://doi.org/10.1086/33709810.1086/337098
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hajibabaei M, Xia J, Drouin G (2006) Seed plant phylogeny: gnetophytes are derived conifers and a sister group to Pinaceae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40: 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.03.00610.1016/j.ympev.2006.03.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hirayoshi I, Nakamura Y (1943) Chromosome number in Sequoia sempervirens. Plant & Animal 1: 73-75 (in Japanese).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hizume M (1989) Karyomorphological studies in twelve species in the Taxodiaceae with special reference to cytotaxonomical position of Sciadopitys verticillata. Mem. Fac. Educ. Ehime Univ., Ser. 3, Nat. Sci. 9: 7–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hizume M (1997) Chromosomes of Ginkgo biloba In: Ginkgo biloba a global treasure from biology to medicine, Hori T, Ridge RW, Tulecke PD, Tredici J, Tremouillaux-Guiller J, Tobe H eds., Springer Verlag Tokyo pp 109-119.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hizume M, Fujiwara M (2016) Fluorescent chromosome banding patterns of several species in the Cupressaceae sensu strict. Chromosome Botany 11 : 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3199/iscb.11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hizume M, Tominaga K (2016) Fluorescent band pattern of chromosomes in Ephedra americana var. andina, Ephedraceae. Chromosome Botany 11: 27-30. https://doi.org/10.3199/iscb.11.2710.3199/iscb.11.27
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hizume M, Abe KK,Tanaka A (1988) Fluorescent choromosome bandings in the Taxodiaceae. La Kromosomo II-50: 1609-1619.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hizume M, Kaneko K, Miyake T (2014) A method for the preparation of meiotic chromosomes of conifers and its applications. Chromosome Botany 9: 83-88. https://doi.org/10.3199/iscb.9.8310.3199/iscb.9.83
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hizume M, Gu Z, Yue Z, Kondo K (1993) Karyomorphological studies on Gnetum montana collected in Yunnan China Chromosome Information Service 54:23-25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hizume M, Kondo T, Shibata F, Ishizuka R (2001) Flow cytometric determination of genome size in the Taxodiaceae, Cupressaceae sensu stricto and Sciadopityaceae. Cytologia 66: 307-311. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.66.30710.1508/cytologia.66.307
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hunziker JH (1953) Numero de cromosomas de varias species sudamericanas de Ephedra. Rev.Argent Agronom 20: 141-143.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hunziker JH (1955) Morfologiacromosomica de nueveespecies argentinasdelgenero “Ephedra”. Rev. Invest. Agr. 9: 201-209.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyun SK (1953) Induction of polyploidy in pines by means of colchicine treatment.Z. Forstgenetik u. Forstpflanzenzüchtung3: 25-33.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ickert Bond SM, Rydin C, Renner SS (2003) Pollen dimorphism in Ephedra L. (Ephedraceae). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 124: 325-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-6667(03)00002-210.1016/S0034-6667(03)00002-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ickert-Bond SM, Sousa A, Ya M, Pellicer J, Leitch I (2014) The evolution of genome size in gymnosperm genus Ephedra: Flow cytometry and new chromosome counts support high levels of polyploidy. Botany New Frontiers in Botany, The Boise Centre-Boise Idaho July 26-30, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ickert-Bond SM, Sousa A, Ya M, Loera I, Metzgar J, Pellicer J, Hidalgo O, Leitch I (2020) Polyploidy in gymnosperms- Insights into the genomic and evolutionary consequences of polyploidy in Ephedra. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 147: 106786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2020.10678610.1016/j.ympev.2020.10678632135310
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Illies ZM (1951) Colchicineversuche an Larix decidua Miller und Picea abies Karst. Z. Forstgenetik u. Forstpflanzenzüchtung1: 36-39.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Illies ZM (1953) Keimlingsabnormalitatan bei Picea abies (L.) Karst. Z. Forstgenetik u. Forstpflanzenzüchtung 2: 28-32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Illies ZM (1957) Zytologische Beobachtungenaneiner 7 jährigen Co-Generation von Lärche. Silvae Genetica 6:151–152.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Illies ZM (1958) Polysomatie in Meristem von Einzelbaumsaarten bei Picea abies. Silvae Genetica 7: 94-97
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Illies ZM (1966a) Die Variation unbalanzierter Chromosomenzahlen im Knospenmeristem fünf aufeinanderfolgenderAstjahrgänge bei aneuploiden C1-Lärchen.Silvae Genetica15: 133–135.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Illies ZM (1966b) The development of an euploidy in somatic cells of experimentally produced triploid larches Heredity 21: 379-385. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1966.3910.1038/hdy.1966.39
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Illies ZM (1969) Two aneuploid generations of larch hybrids deriving from colchicines induced Larix sp. Proc.Second World Consultation on Forest Tree Breeding, 5p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
International Brachypodium Initiative (2010) Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Nature 463: 763–768. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0874710.1038/nature0874720148030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jensen H, Levan A (1941) Colchicine induced tetraploidy in Sequoiadendron giganteum. Hereditas 27: 220-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1941.tb03257.x10.1111/j.1601-5223.1941.tb03257.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jiao Y, Li J, Tang H, Paterson AH (2014) Integrated syntenic and phylogenomic analyses reveal an ancient Genome Duplication in Monocots.The Plant Cell 26: 2792–2802. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.114.12759710.1105/tpc.114.127597414511425082857
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jiao Y, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S, Chanderbali AS, Landherr L, Ralph PE et al. (2011) Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 473: 97-100. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0991610.1038/nature0991621478875
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnsson H (1975) Observations on induced polyploidy in some conifers (Pinus silvestris, P. contorta, Picea abies, and Larix siberica. Silvae Genetica 24: 62-68
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kanezawa R (1949) Polyploids appeared in twin seedling of forest trees. Journal of Japanese Forest Society 31: 22-24 (in Japanese).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kanezawa R (1951) Induced tetraploidy in Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa Endl.). Bul. of the Tokyo Univ. For. 39:21–30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kawatani T, Fujita S, Ohno T, Kuboki N, Hoshizaki K (1959) On the alkaloidal content of ephedras cultivated at Kasukabe. J. Pharmaceutical Soc. Jap. 79: 392-393. https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi1947.79.3_39210.1248/yakushi1947.79.3_392
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khoshoo TN (1959) Polyploidy in gymnosperms. Evolution 13: 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1959.tb02991.x10.1111/j.1558-5646.1959.tb02991.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khoshoo TN (1979) Cytogenetics in relation to plant evolution and improvement. In: Khoshoo TN, Nair PKK, eds. Progress in Plant Research.Vol. 2. Silver Jubilee Publication, National Botanical Research Institute; 1979. pp. 1–74.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kiellander CL (1950) Polyploidy in Picea abies. Hereditas 36: 513-516.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kitani Y, Zhu S, Batkhuu J, Sanchir C, Komatsu K (2011) Genetic diversity of Ephedra plants in Mongolia inferred from internal transcribed spacer sequence of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 34:717-726. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.34.71710.1248/bpb.34.71721532163
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kondo T (1988) Variation of karyotype in plus tree clones of Japanese cedar, Cryptomeria japonica. Acta Radiobotanica et Genetica 7: 1-48
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kondo T, Hizume M (2000) Chromosomal variation and its application for genome study in Japanese cedar, Cryptomeria japonica. In: Cytogenetic studies and outlook on the future, eds: Guttenberger H, Borzan Z, Schlarbaum S E, Hartman P V. Arbora Publishers Zvole, Slovakia, pp. 89-93.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kondo T, Hizume M, Kubota R (1985) Variation of fluorescent chromosome bands of Cryptomeria japonica. J. Jap. Forest. Soc. 67: 184–189.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kong H, Chen Q, Ma J (2001) A study on karyotypes of two species in Ephedra. J. Lanzhou Univ., Nat. Sci. 37: 100–103.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kozhevnikova ZV, Kozhevnikov AE (2012) IAPT/IOPB Chromosome Data 13. Taxon 61: 895-897. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.61402310.1002/tax.614023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krapovikas AMF De (1954) Complemento cromosomico de species austro americanas de Ephedra. Rev. Argent. Agron. 21: 43-45.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kurschner WM, Batenburg SJ, Mander L (2013) Aberrant Classopolis pollen reveals evidence for unreduced (2n) pollen during the Triassic-Jurassuc transition. Proceedings Royal Society B 280: 20131708. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.170810.1098/rspb.2013.1708375798823926159
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Land WGJ (1913) Vegetative reproduction in an Ephedra. Botanical Gazette 55: 439-445. https://doi.org/10.1086/33108610.1086/331086
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leebens-Mack JH, Barker MS, Carpenter EJ, Deyholos MK, Gitzendanner MA et al.(2019) One thousand plant transcriptomes and the phylogenomics of green plants. Nature 574: 679-685. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1693-210.1038/s41586-019-1693-2687249031645766
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leitch AR, Leitch IJ (2012) Ecological and genetic factors linked to contrasting genome dynamics in seed plants. New Phytologist 194: 629–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04105.x10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04105.x22432525
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leitch IJ, Hanson L, Winfield M, Parker J, Bennett MD (2001) Nuclear DNA C-values complete familial representation in gymnosperms Annals of Botany 88: 843-849. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2001.152110.1006/anbo.2001.1521
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leitch IJ, Dodsworth S (2017) Endopolyploidy in Plants. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd:Chichester. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0020097.pub210.1002/9780470015902.a0020097.pub2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li LC, Fu YX (1996) Studies on the karyotypes and the cytogeography of Cupressus (Cupressaceae). Acta Phytotax. Sin. 34: 117–123.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li Z, Baniaga AE, Sessa EB, Scascitelli M, Graham SW, Rieseberg LH, Barker MS (2015) Early genome duplications in conifers and other seed plants. Science Advances 1: e1501084. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.150108410.1126/sciadv.1501084468133226702445
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li Z, Barker MS (2019) Inferring putative ancient whole genome duplications in the 1000 plants (1KP) initiative: access to gene family phylogenies and age distributions. Giga Science:9:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaa00410.1093/gigascience/giaa004701144632043527
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu H, Cao F, Yin T, Chen Y (2017) A highly dense genetic map for Ginkgo biloba constructed using sequence based markers. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.0104110.3389/fpls.2017.01041547129828663754
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Madlung A (2013) Polyploidy and its effect on evolutionary success: old question revisited with new tools. Heredity 110: 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2012.7910.1038/hdy.2012.79355444923149459
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Masterson J (1994) Stomatal size in fossil plants: evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science 264:421–424. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.264.5157.42110.1126/science.264.5157.42117836906
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mathew PM, Mathew J, Christopher C, Haridas P (2014a) Karyomorphological studies in conifers. Journal of Cytology & Genetics 15 (NS) : 107-121
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mathew PM, Mathew J, Christopher C, Haridas P (2014b) Cytological studies with reference to karyomorphology of Gnetum and Ephedra. Journal of Cytology & Genetics 15 (NS) : 123-134
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matsuda K (1980) Triploids and meiosis in Cryptomeria japonica. Forest Tree Breeding 116: 23-24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matsuda K, Miyajima H (1977) On the triploid of Cryptomeria japonica D. Don. Journal of Japanese Forest Society 59: 148-150.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McElwain JC, Steinthorsdottir M (2017) Paleoecology ploidy paleoatmospheric composition and developmental biology: A review of the multiple uses of fossil stomata. Plant Physiology 174: 650-664. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.0020410.1104/pp.17.00204546206428495890
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mehra PN (1946a) A study of the karyotype and the occurrence of diploid male gametophyte in some species of the genus Ephedra. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences India 16: 259- 291
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mehra PN (1946b) Method of formation of diploid pollen and development of male gametophyte in Ephedra saxatilis Royle. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc. (Iyengar Comm. Vol.) pp. 121-132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mehra PN (1976) Conifers of the Himalayas with particular reference to the Abies and Juniperus complexes. Nucleus 19:123-129.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mehra PN (1988) Indian Conifers, Gnetophytes and Phylogeny of Gymnosperms. Panjab University, Chandigarh
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mehra PN, Khoshoo TN (1956a) Cytology of conifers I. Journal of Genetics 54:165-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0298170810.1007/BF02981708
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mehra PN, Rai KS (1957) Cytology of Gnetum ula. Journal of Genetics 55:394-396. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0298165210.1007/BF02981652
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Menon M, Bagley JC, Friedline CJ, et al. (2018) The role of hybridization during ecological divergence of southwestern white pine (Pinus strobiformis) and limber pine (P. flexilis). Molecular Ecology 27:1245–1260. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.1450510.1111/mec.1450529411444
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Menon M, Landguth E, Leal-Saenz A, et al. (2020) Tracing the footprints of a moving hybrid zone under a demographic history of speciation with gene flow. Evolutionary Applications 13: 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.1279510.1111/eva.12795693558831892952
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mercier R, Mezard C, Jenczewski E Macaisne N, Grelon M (2015) The molecular biology of meiosis in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 66:297-327. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-03592310.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-03592325494464
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mergen F (1958) Natural polyploidy in slash pine. Forest Science 4: 283-295. Miller CN (1977) Mesozoic conifers. Botanical Review 43: 217-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0286071810.1007/BF02860718
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mukherjee A, Hall M T(1979) In IOPB chromosome number reports LXIII. Taxon 28:269-270.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muratova EN (1995) Chromosome numbers in some species of the Pinaceae family. Bot. Žhurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 80: 115.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muratova NE (1997) Studies on nucleolar chromosomes in representatives of Pinaceae Lindl. In: Cytogenetic studies of forest trees and shrub species ed. Borzan Z & Schlarbaum S E, Proceedings of the first IUFRO cytogenetics Working Party S2.04-08 Symposium Sept. 8-11 1993 pp 45-72.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muratova EN, Vladimirova OS, Sedelnikova TS (2001) Chromosome numbers of some gymnosperms. Bot. Žhurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 86: 143–144.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murín A, Májovský J (1979) Karyological Study of slovakian flora I. - Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comen., Bot. 27:127-133., IAPT/IOPB Chromosome Data 13
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nagano K, Umeda T, Toda Y (2000) Karyomorphological study of Juniperus In: Cytogenetics of forest trees and shrubs, Review, Present Status and Outlook for future. Ed. Guttenberger H, Borzan Z, Schlarbaum SE, Hartman TPV, Spl issue of the Forest Genetics Arbora Publishers, Zvolen, Slovakia, pp. 143-159.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nagano K, Matoba H, Yonemura K, Matsuda Y, Murata T, Hoshi Y (2007) Karyo-type analysis of three Juniperus Species using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with two Ribosomal RNA Genes. Cytologia 72: 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.72.3710.1508/cytologia.72.37
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nakata M, Oginuma K (1989) Cytological studies on phanerogams in southern Peru, II. Chromosomes of Tetraglochin strictum (Rosaceae) and Ephedra americana (Ephedraceae). Bull. Natl. Sci. Mus., Tokyo, B 15: 63–66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nishimura S (1960) Chromosome numbers of polyembryonic seedlings of Pinus thunbergii Parl. J. Jap.For. Sci. 42:263-264.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nystedt B, Street NR, Wetterborn A, Zuccolo A, Lin WC et al. (2013) The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution. Nature 497:579-584.10.1038/nature1221123698360
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Hara KL, Cox LE, Nikolaeva S, Bauer JJ, Hedges R (2017) Regeneration dynamics of coast redwood, a sprouting conifer species: a review with implications for management and restoration. Forests8: 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/f805014410.3390/f8050144
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ohri D (2013) Cytogenetics of domestication and improvement of garden gladiolus and bougainvillea. Nucleus 56: 149-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-013-0091-710.1007/s13237-013-0091-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ohri D (2015) How small and constrained is the genome size of angiosperm woody species. Silvae Genetica 64: 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2015-000210.1515/sg-2015-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ohri D, Khoshoo TN (1986) Genome size in gymnosperms. Plant Systematics and Evolution 153: 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0098942110.1007/BF00989421
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ohri D, Zadoo SN (1986) Cytogenetics of cultivated bougainvilleas IX. Precocious centromere division and origin of polyploidy taxa. Plant Breed. 97:227–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1986.tb01057.x10.1111/j.1439-0523.1986.tb01057.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Olson DFJ, Roy DF, Walters GA (1990) Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl. Redwood (Agriculture handbook654). In Silvics of North America, Volume 1. Conifers; USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA,pp. 541–551.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Otto SP, Whitton J (2000) Polyploidy incidence and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics 34:401–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.40110.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.40111092833
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paterson AH, et al. (2009) The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457: 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0772310.1038/nature0772319189423
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pearson HHW (1929) Gnetales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pichot C, Maataoui M (2000) Unreduced diploid nuclei in Cupressus dupreziana Z. Camus pollen. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 574-579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122005151810.1007/s001220051518
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pimenov AV, Sedelnikova TS (2002) Chromosome numbers of some Pinaceae from western and middle Siberia. Bot. Žhurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 87: 136–137.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Premoli AC, Kitzberger T, Veblen TT (2000) Conservation genetics of the endangered conifer Fitzroya cupressoides in Chile and Argentina. Conservation Genetics 1: 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:101018160337410.1023/A:1010181603374
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Price H, Sparrow A, Nauman A (1973) Evolutionary and developmental considerations of the variability of nuclear parameters in higher plants. I. Genome volume, interphase chromosome volume, and estimated DNA content of 236 gymnosperms. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology 25: 390-421.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ramsey J, Schemske DW (1998) Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploidy formation in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 467-501. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.46710.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.467
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rastogi S, Ohri D (2020a) Karyotype evolution in cycads. Nucleus 63: 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-019-00302-210.1007/s13237-019-00302-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rastogi S, Ohri D (2020b) Chromosome numbers in gymnosperms-an update. Silvea Genetica 69: 13-19. https://doi.org/10.2478/sg-2020-000310.2478/sg-2020-0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Renny-Byfield S, Wendel JF (2014) Doubling down on genomes: Polyploidy and crop plants. American Journal of Botany 101: 1711 – 1725. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.140011910.3732/ajb.140011925090999
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ren GP, Abbott RJ, Zhou YF, Zhang LR, Peng YL, Liu JQ (2012) Genetic divergence, range expansion and possible homoploid hybrid speciation among pine species in Northeast China. Heredity (2012) 108, 552–562. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2011.12310.1038/hdy.2011.123333068422187083
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Resende F (1937) Planta 26: 757-807. Vide Darlington and Wylie (1955).10.1007/BF01915460
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rice A, Smarda P, Novosolov M, Drori M, Glick L, Sabath N, Meiri S, Belmaker J, Mayrose I (2019) The global biogeography of polyploidy plants. Nature Ecology & Evolution 3: 265-273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0787-910.1038/s41559-018-0787-930697006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rogers DL (1997) Inheritance of allozymes from seed tissues of hexaploid gymnosperm, Sequoia sempervirens (D.Don) Endl.) (coast redwood). Heredity 78: 166-175. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1997.2410.1038/hdy.1997.24
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Romo A, Hidalgo O, Boratynski A, obierajska K, Jasinka A, Vallès J, Garnatje T (2013) Genome size and ploidy levels in highly fragmented habitats: the case of western Mediterranean Juniperus (Cupressaceae) with special emphasis on J. thurifera L. Tree Genetics and Genomes 9: 587-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-012-0581-910.1007/s11295-012-0581-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roodt D, Lohaus R, Sterck L, Swanepoel R, Van der Peer Y, Mizrachi E (2017) Evidence for an ancient whole genome duplication in the cycad lineage. Plos One 12: e184454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.018445410.1371/journal.pone.0184454559096128886111
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruprecht C, Lohaus R, Vanneste K, Mutwil M, Nikoloski Z, Van der Peer Y, Persson S (2017) Revisiting ancestral polyploidy in plants. Science Advances 3: e1603195. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.160319510.1126/sciadv.1603195549810928695205
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sasaki Y (1982) Triploids in plus trees in Cryptomeria japonica and Chamaecyparis obtusa. Res.Rep. Oita Pref. For. Res. Inst. 5: 5-13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sax K, Sax HJ (1933) Chromosome number and morphology in the conifers. Journal of Arnold Arboretum 14: 356-375. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.995910.5962/bhl.part.9959
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salman-Minkov A, Sabath N, Mayrose I (2016) Whole-genome duplication as a key factor in crop domestication. Nature Plants 2: 16115. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.11510.1038/nplants.2016.11527479829
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saylor, LC, Simons HA (1970) Karyology of Sequoia sempervirens: karyotype and accessory chromosomes. Cytologia 35: 294-303. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.35.29410.1508/cytologia.35.294
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schlarbaum SE, Tsuchiya T (1975) The chromosome study of giant sequoia, Sequoiadendron giganteum. Silvae Genetica 24: 23-26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schlarbaum SE, Tsuchiya T (1984a) A chromosome study of coast redwood, Sequoia sempervirens D. (Don) Endl. Silvae Genetica33: 56-62
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schlarbaum SE, Tsuchiya T (1984b) Cytotaxonomy and phylogeny in certain species of Taxodiaceae. Plant Systematics & Evolution 147: 29-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0098457810.1007/BF00984578
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schlarbaum SE, Tsuchiya T, Johnson LC (1984) The chromosomes and relationship of Metasequoia and Sequoia (Taxodiaceae): an update. Journal of Arnold Arboretum 65: 251-254.10.5962/p.185921
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scott AD, Stenz NWM, Ingvarsson PK, Baum DA (2016) Whole genome duplication in coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) and its implications for explaining the rarity of polyploidy in conifers. New Phytologist 211: 186-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.1393010.1111/nph.1393026996245
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sedelnikova TS, Muratova EN (1999) Cytological study of „witches‘-broom“ type of Pinus sylvestris (Pinaceae) from a bog. Citologija 41: 1082.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sedelnikova TS, Muratova EN (2001) Karyological studies of „witches‘broom“ type of Pinus sylvestris (Pinaceae) from a bog. Bot. Žhurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 86: 50–59.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sedelnikova TS, Pimenov AV (2003) Chromosome mutations in marshland and dry valley populations of Abies sibirica Ledeb. Citologija 45: 515–520.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sedelnikova TS, Muratova EN, Pimenov AV (2011) Variability of chromosome numbers in gymnosperms. Biology Bulletin Reviews 1: 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1134/s207908641102008310.1134/S2079086411020083
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smarda P, Vesely P, Smarda Y, Bures P, Knapek O, Chytra M (2016) Polyploidy in a living fossil Ginkgo biloba. New Phytologist 212:11-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.1406210.1111/nph.1406227265838
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smarda P, Horova L, Knapek O, Dieck H, Dieck M, Razna K, Hrubik P, Orloci L, Papp L, Vesela K, Vesely P, Bures P (2018) Multiple haploids triploids and tetraploids found in modern day `living fossil’ Ginkgo biloba. Horticulture Research 5:55. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-018-0055-910.1038/s41438-018-0055-9616584530302259
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soltis DE, Albert VA, Leebens-Mack J, Soltis PS (2009) Polyploidy and angio-sperm diversification. American Journal of Botany 96:336-348. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.080007910.3732/ajb.080007921628192
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Somego M, Ito S, Kanezawa T (1981) Natural triploid plants found in plus tree of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D.Don.). Trans 33rd Mtg. Kanto Branch Jp. For. Soc. 81-82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stebbins GL (1948) The chromosomes and relationship of Metasequoia and Sequoia. Science 108: 95-98. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.108.2796.9510.1126/science.108.2796.9517808724
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stiff ML (1951) A naturally occurring triploid juniper. Va. J. Sci. 2: 317.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suyama Y, Mukai Y, Kondo T (1996) Assignment of RFLP linkage groups to their respective chromosomes in sugi (Cryptomeria japonica). Theoretical & Applied Genetics 92: 292-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0022367110.1007/BF0022367124166249
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Syrach-Larsen C, Westergaard M (1938) A triploid hybrid between Larix decidua Mill. And Larix occidenatlis Nutt. J. Genet. 36: 523-530.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tarnavarschi IT, Lungeanu I (1970a) Chromosomenzahlen von einigen in Rumanian wildwachsenden Anthophyten. Rev. Roum. Biol., Bot. 15: 381-383.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tarnavarschi IT, Lungeanu R (1970b) In IOPB chromosome number reports XX-VIII. Taxon 19: 608-610. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1996-8175.1970.tb03062.x10.1002/j.1996-8175.1970.tb03062.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Terasaka O (1982) Nuclear differentiation of male gametophytes in Gymnosperms. Cytologia 47: 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.47.1_2710.1508/cytologia.47.1_27
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2009) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.161: 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Plant List (2010) Version 1 Published on the Internet. http://www.theplantlist.org/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Toda E, Okamoto T (2016) Formation of triploid plants via possible polyspermy. Plant Signaling & Behavior 2016, VOL.11, NO.9, e1218107 (5pages). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2016.121810710.1080/15592324.2016.1218107505846027617495
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Toda Y (1996) Karyomorphological studies of the Taxodiaceae. Forest Science 3: 175-180.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Toda Y, Sotoyama S (1972) Variants of woods. Iden 26: 50-54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tremblay L, Levasseur C, Tremblay FM (1999) Frequency of somaclonal variation in plants of black spruce (Picea mariana, Pinaceae) and white spruce (P. glauca, Pinaceae) from somatic embryogenesis and identification of some factors involved in genetic instability. American Journal of Botany 86: 1373-1381. https://doi.org/10.2307/265692010.2307/2656920
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vallès V, Garnatje T, Robin O, Siljak-Yakovlev S (2015) Molecular cytogenetic studies in western Mediterranean Juniperus (Cupressaceae): a constant model of GC-rich chromosomal regions and rDNA loci with evidences for paleopolyploidy. Tree Genetics & Genomes 11:43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-015-0860-310.1007/s11295-015-0860-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van de Peer Y, Mizrachi E, Marchal K (2017) The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18:411–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.2610.1038/nrg.2017.2628502977
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Drunen WE, Husband BC (2019) Evolutionary associations between polyploidy, clonal reproduction, and perenniality in the angiosperms. New Phytologist (2019) 224: 1266–1277. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.1599910.1111/nph.1599931215649
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Veblen TT, Burns BR, Kitzberger T, Lara A, Villalba R (1995) The ecology of the conifers of southern South America. In: Ecologyof Southern Conifers(eds. En-right NJ, Hill RS), pp. 120–155. Melbourne University Press, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wakamiya I, Price HJ, Messina MG, Newton RJ (1996) Pine genome diversity and water relations. Physiologia Plantarum 96: 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1996.960103.x10.1034/j.1399-3054.1996.960103.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wan T, Liu ZM, Li LF, Leitch AR, Leitch IJ, Lohaus R et al. (2018) A genome for gnetophytes and early evolution of seed plants Nature Plants 4: 82-89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-017-0097-210.1038/s41477-017-0097-229379155
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang BS, Mao JF, Gao J, Zhao W, Wang XR (2011) Colonization of the Tibetan Plateau by the homoploid hybrid pine Pinus densata. Mol Ecol 20: 3796– 3811. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05157.x10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05157.x21689188
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wendt T (1993) A new variety of Ephedra torreyana (Ephedraceae) from West Texas and Chihuahua, with notes on hybridization in the E. torreyana complex. Phytologia 74: 141-150.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wesche K, Ronnenberg K, Hensen I (2005) Lack of sexual reproduction within mountain steppe populations of the clonal shrub Juniperus sabina L. in semi arid southern Mongolia. Journal of Arid Environment 63: 390-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.03.01410.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.03.014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Emadzade K, Jang TS, Schneeweiss GM (2013) Evolutionary consequences, constraints and potential of polyploidy in plants. Cyto-genetic and Genome Evolution 140: 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1159/00035172710.1159/000351727385992423796571
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williams CG (2009) Conifer reproductive biology. Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York.10.1007/978-1-4020-9602-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Willyard A, Cronn R, Liston A (2009) Reticulate evolution and incomplete lineage sorting among the ponderosa pines. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 52: 498–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2009.02.01110.1016/j.ympev.2009.02.01119249377
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Winton LL (1964) Natural polyploidy in juvenile white and black spruce. Minnesota Forestry Notes Published as Sci. Jour. Ser. Paper No. 5452 of the Minn. Agri. Exp. Stn.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Won H, Renner SS (2005) The internal transcribed spacer of nuclear ribosomal DNA in the gymnosperm Gnetum. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 36: 581-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2005.03.01110.1016/j.ympev.2005.03.01116099382
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wood TE, Takebayashi N, Barker MS, Mayrose I, Greenspoon PB, Rieseberg LH (2009) The frequency of polyploidy speciation in vascular plants. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences USA. 106:13875–13879. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.081157510610.1073/pnas.0811575106272898819667210
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu H, Ma Z, Wang M M, Qin A L, Ran J H, Wang XQ (2016) A high frequency of allopolyploid speciation in the gymnospermous genus Ephedra and its possible association with some biological and ecological features.MolecularEcology 25: 1192-1210. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.1353810.1111/mec.13538716840326800145
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu H, Yu Q, Ran J-H, Wang X-Q (2020) Unbiased subgenome evolution in allotetraploid species of Ephedra and its implications for the evolution of large genomes in gymnosperms. Genome Biology and Evolution evaa 236. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evaa23610.1093/gbe/evaa236790087533196777
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu JL, Li S, Jiang H, Gao YH, Niu JY (2009) Slide preparing technique of mitotic chromosomes and application in karyotype technique of mitotic chromosomes and application in karyotype determination of Ephedra. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica 34: 2725-2729.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu S, Han B, Jiao Y (2020) Genetic contribution of paleopolyploidy to adaptive evolution in angiosperms. Molecular Plant 13: 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2019.10.01210.1016/j.molp.2019.10.01231678615
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xu BS, Weng RF, Zhang MZ (1992) Chromosome numbers of Shanghai plants I. Invest. Stud. Nat. 12: 48–65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yang ZY, Ran JH, Wang XQ (2012) Three genome-based phylogeny of Cupressaceae sl: further evidence for the evolution of gymnosperms and Southern Hemisphere biogeography. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 64: 452–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.05.00410.1016/j.ympev.2012.05.00422609823
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yousafzai FK, Kaff AI, Moore G (2010) The molecular features of chromosome pairing at meiosis: the polyploidy challenge using wheat as a reference. Functional & Integrative Genomics 10:147-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-010-0171-610.1007/s10142-010-0171-620422242
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhou Z-Y (2009) An overview of fossil Ginkgoales. Palaeoworld 18(1-22): 206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2009.01.00110.1016/j.palwor.2009.01.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zinnai I, Chiba S (1951) (Naturally occurring tetraploids of Cryptomeria japonica) Ikushugaku Zasshi. Japanese Journal of Breeding 1:43-46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zinnai L (1952) Tetraploid plants in Japanese red pine (Pinus densiflora Sieb. Et Zucc.) discovered in transplant beds. J. Jap. For. Soc. 34: 185-187.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zonneveld BJM (2012) Conifer genome sizes of 172 species, covering 64 out of the 67 genera, range from 8 to 72 picogram. Nordic Journal of Botany 30: 490-502.10.1111/j.1756-1051.2012.01516.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zwaenepoel A, Van der Peer Y (2019) Inference of ancient whole genome duplications and the evolution of the gene duplication and loss rate. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36: 1384-1404. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz08810.1093/molbev/msz08831004147
]Search in Google Scholar
