1. bookVolume 68 (2019): Edizione 1 (January 2019)
Dettagli della rivista
Prima pubblicazione
22 Feb 2016
Frequenza di pubblicazione
1 volta all'anno
Accesso libero

Impact of fertility variation on genetic diversity and phenotypic traits in second generation seed production areas and clonal seed orchards of Eucalyptus camaldulensis

Pubblicato online: 09 Apr 2019
Volume & Edizione: Volume 68 (2019) - Edizione 1 (January 2019)
Pagine: 29 - 40
Dettagli della rivista
Prima pubblicazione
22 Feb 2016
Frequenza di pubblicazione
1 volta all'anno

Arndt S, Sanders G, Hirsch M (2014) Hydraulic and ecophysiological traits related to tree drought mortality are linked to the aridity of the environment in eucalypts. Int Forest Rev 16(5): 236Search in Google Scholar

Bezemer N, Krauss SL, Phillips RD, Roberts DG, Hopper SD (2016) Paternity analysis reveals wide pollen dispersal and high multiple paternity in a small isolated population of the bird-pollinated Eucalyptus caesia (Myrtaceae). Heredity (2016) 117, 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2016.6110.1038/hdy.2016.61511784027530908Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bila AD, Lindgren D, Mullin TJ (1999) Fertility variation and its effect on diversity over generations in a teak plantation (Tectona grandis L.f) Silvae Genet 48:109-114.Search in Google Scholar

Bouvet JM, Vigneron P, Saya A (2005) Phenotypic plasticity of growth trajectory and ontogenic allometry in response to density for Eucalyptus hybrid clones and families. Ann Bot 96: 811–821. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci23110.1093/aob/mci231424704516043439Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bouvet JM, Saya A, Vigneron P (2009) Trends in additive, dominance and environmental effects with age for growth traits in Eucalyptus hybrid populations, Euphytica, 165 : 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9746-x10.1007/s10681-008-9746-xApri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Breed MF, Christmas MJ, Lowe AJ (2014) Higher levels of multiple paternities increase seedling survival in the long-lived tree Eucalyptus gracilis. PLoS ONE 9(2):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.009047810.1371/journal.pone.0090478393874524587373Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Burgess IP, Williams ER, Bell JC, Harwood CE, Owen JV (1996) The effect of outcrossing rate on the growth of selected families of Eucalyptus grandis. Silvae Genet 45 (2-3):97-100Search in Google Scholar

Butcher PA, Williams ER (2002) Variation in outcrossing rates and growth in Eucalyptus camaldulensis from the Petford Region, Queensland; evidence of outbreeding depression. Silvae Genet 51:6–12Search in Google Scholar

Chezhian P, Yasodha R, Modhumita Ghosh (2010) Genetic diversity analysis in a seed orchard of Eucalyptus tereticornis. New For. 40: 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-009-9184-110.1007/s11056-009-9184-1Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Chaix G, Gerber S, Razafimaharo V, Vigneron P, Verhaegen D, Hamon S (2003) Gene flow estimation with microsatellites in a Malagasy seed orchard of Eucalyptus grandis. Theor Appl Genet 107:705–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1294-010.1007/s00122-003-1294-012750775Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Chaix G, Vigneron P, Razafimaharo V, Hamon S (2007) Are phenological observations sufficient to estimate the quality of seed crops from a Eucalyptus grandis open-pollinated seed orchard? consequences for seed collections. New For 33: 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-006-9012-910.1007/s11056-006-9012-9Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Chaix G, Vigneron P, Razafimaharo V, Hamon S (2010) Improved management of Malagasy Eucalyptus grandis seed orchards using microsatellites and paternity assessment. J Trop For Sci 22(3): 271–280.Search in Google Scholar

Cornelius JP, Clement CR, Weber JC, Sotelo-Montes C, van Leeuwen J, Ugarte-Guerra LJ, Ricse-Tembladera A, Arevalo-Lopez L (2006). The trade-off between genetic gain and conservation in a participatory improvement programme: the case of peach palm (Bactris gasipaes Kunth). Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 2006, Vol. 16, pp. 17–34.https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2006.975254310.1080/14728028.2006.9752543Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Danusevicius D, Lindgren D (2010) Efficiency of breeding strategy where grandparents - but not parents - contribute equally to the breeding population. Ann. For. Sci. 67 (2010) 404. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/200912410.1051/forest/2009124Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Davidson J (1998) Domestication and breeding programme for Eucalyptus in the Asia-Pacific region. UNDP/FAO Regional Project on Improved Productivity of Man-Made Forests through Application of Technological Advances in Tree Breeding and Propagation (FORTIP), Philippines. 252p.Search in Google Scholar

Dehon G, Resende S, Resende M, Assis T (2013) A roadmap to eucalyptus breeding for clonal forestry. In: Fenning TM (ed) Challenges and opportunities for the world’s forests in the 21st century. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 394–424.Search in Google Scholar

Doran JC, Pinyopusarerk K, Arnold R, Harwood CE (1996) Breeding Plan for Eucalyptus camaldulensis in Tamil nadu. UNDP/FAO Regional Project on Improved Productivity of Man Made Forests through Application of Technical Advances in Tree Breeding and Propagation (RAS/91/004 – FORTIP), FAO, Los Banos, Phillipines, 40p.Search in Google Scholar

El-Kassaby YA (1992). Domestication and genetic diversity - should we be concerned? Forest Chron 68(6): 687-700. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc68687-610.5558/tfc68687-6Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

El-Kassaby YA (1995) Evaluation of tree-improvement delivery system: factors affecting genetic potential. Tree Physiol 15:545-550.https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/15.7-8.54510.1093/treephys/15.7-8.54514965941Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Funda, T, El-Kassaby YA (2012) Seed orchard genetics. CAB Reviews 7(13): 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1079/pavsnnr2012701310.1079/pavsnnr20127013Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Funda T, Lstibůrek M, Lachout P, Klápště J, El-Kassaby YA (2009) Optimization of combined genetic gain and diversity for collection and deployment of seed orchard crops. Tree Genet Genomes 5: 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-009-0211-310.1007/s11295-009-0211-3Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gaiotto FA, Bramucci M, Grattapaglia D (1997) Estimation of out-crossing rate in a breeding population of Eucalyptus urophylla with dominant RAPD and AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet 95:842–849.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122005063410.1007/s001220050634Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gardner RAW, Little KM, Arbuthnot A (2007) Wood and fibre productivity potential of promising new eucalypt species for coastal Zululand, South Africa. Aust Forestry 70: 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2007.1067626110.1080/00049158.2007.10676261Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gonzaga JMS, Manoel RO, Sousa ACB, Sousa AP, Moraes MLT, Freitas MLM, Sebbenn AM (2016) Pollen contamination and non-random mating in a Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh seedling seed orchard, Silvae Genet 65(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2016-000110.1515/sg-2016-0001Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Griffin AR (2014) Clones or improved seedlings of Eucalyptus? Not a simple choice. Int Forest Rev 16:216–224. https://doi.org/10.1505/14655481481172479310.1505/146554814811724793Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hardner C, Dieters M, DeLacy I, Neal J, Fletcher S, Dale G, Basford K (2011) Identifying deployment zones for Eucalyptus camaldulensis × E. globulus and × E. grandis hybrids using factor analytic modelling of genotype by environment interaction. Aust Forestry 74(1):30-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2011.1067634310.1080/00049158.2011.10676343Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Harwood CE, Nikles DG, Pomroy PC, Robson KW (1997) Genetic improvement of E. pellita in North Queensland, Australia. In: Proceedings of the IUFRO Conference on Silviculture and improvement of eucalypt, Salvador, pp 219–226.Search in Google Scholar

Hendre PS, Kamalakannan R, Varghese M (2012) High-throughput and parallel SNP discovery in selected candidate genes in Eucalyptus camaldulensis using Illumina NGS platform. Plant Biotech J 10:646-656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00699.x10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00699.x22607345Search in Google Scholar

Hou YC, Yan ZH, Wei YM, Zheng YL (2005) Genetic diversity in barley from west China based on RAPD and ISSR analysis. Barley Genetics Newsletter 35:9–22Search in Google Scholar

Hung TD, Brawner JT, Meder R, Lee DJ, Southerton S, Thinh HH, Dieters MJ (2015) Estimates of genetic parameters for growth and wood properties in Eucalyptus pellita F. Muell. to support tree breeding in Vietnam. Ann For Sci 72:205–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13595-014-0426-910.1007/s13595-014-0426-9Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

House APN, Bell JC (1996) Genetic diversity, mating system and systematic relationships in two red mahoganies, Eucalyptus pellita and E. scias. Aust J Bot 44(2):157-174. https://doi.org/10.1071/bt996015710.1071/bt9960157Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ingvarsson PK, Dahlberg H (2018) The effects of clonal forestry on genetic diversity in wild and domesticated stands of forest trees, Scand J For Res, https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2018.146966510.1080/02827581.2018.1469665Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ivetić V, Devetaković J, Nonić M, Stanković D, Šijačić-Nikolić M (2016) Genetic diversity and forest reproductive material - from seed source selection to planting. iForest 9:801-812. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1577-00910.3832/ifor1577-009Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Johnson R, St. Clair B, Lipow S (2001) Genetic conservation in applied tree breeding programs. In: Bart A, Thielges BA, Sastrapradja SD, Rimbawanto A (eds) Proceedings of the ITTO Conference on In Situ and Ex Situ Conservation of Commercial Tropical Trees, pp. 215–230. ITTO, Yokohama, Japan.Search in Google Scholar

Jombart T (2008) adegenet: an R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24:1403–1405. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn12910.1093/bioinformatics/btn12918397895Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Jones TH, Steane DA, Jones RC, Pilbeam D, Vaillancourt RE, Potts BM (2006) Effects of domestication on genetic diversity in Eucalyptus globulus. Forest Ecol Manag 234(1-3): 78-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.06.02110.1016/j.foreco.2006.06.021Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Jones ME, Shepherd M, Henry R, Delves A (2008) Pollen flow in Eucalyptus grandis determined by paternity analysis using microsatellite markers. Tree Genet Genomes (2008) 4:37–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-007-0086-010.1007/s11295-007-0086-0Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099-1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x17305863Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kamalakannan R, Suraj PG, Arutselvan T, Varghese M (2011) Early growth performance and wood properties of Eucalyptus interspecific hybrids at coastal and inland sites in southern India. In: IUFRO Conference on improvement and Culture of Eucalyptus, Porto Seguro, Brazil. Proceedings (ed.) Goncalves JLdeM, Stape JL, Grattapaglia D, Voigtlaender M. Piracicaba: ESALQ, 2011. 461-463p.Search in Google Scholar

Kamalakannan R, Varghese M, Suraj PG, Arutselvan T (2016) Options for converting a clone trial of Eucalyptus camaldulensis into a clonal seed orchard considering gain, fertility and effective clone number. J For Res 27(1):51-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0169-y10.1007/s11676-015-0169-yApri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kamalakannan R, Varghese M, Lindgren D (2007) Fertility variation and its implications on relatedness in seed crops in seedling seed orchards of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and E. tereticornis. Silvae Genet 56:253–259. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2007-003610.1515/sg-2007-0036Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kamalakannan R, Varghese M, Chezhian P, Ghosh M, Lindgren D (2009) Fertility variation and gene diversity in seed crops of Eucalyptus and Casuarina seedling seed orchards in southern India. In: Proceedings Seed Orchards Conference, Jeju, 8-11 September 2009. p 35.Search in Google Scholar

Kang KS, Lindgren D, Mullin TJ (2001) Prediction of genetic gain and gene diversity in seed orchards crops under alternative management strategies. Theor Appl Genet 103(6–7):1099–1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122010070010.1007/s001220100700Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kang KS, Bila AD, Harju AM, Lindgren D (2003). Estimation of fertility variation in forest tree populations. Forestry 76(3):329-344. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/76.3.32910.1093/forestry/76.3.329Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kang KS, Lindgren D (1999) Fertility variation among clones of Korean pine and its implications on seed orchard management. For Genet 6:191-200.Search in Google Scholar

Krishnakumar N, Sivakumar V, Anandalakshmi R (2014) Eucalypt improvement in southern India. In: Bhojvaid PP, Kaushik S, Singh YP, Kumar D, Thapliyal M, Barthwal S (eds) Eucalypts in India. Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun, pp 139–148.Search in Google Scholar

Kulkarni HD (2014) Eucalypt Improvement at ITC. In: Bhojvaid PP, Kaushik S, Singh YP, Kumar D, Thapliyal M, Barthwal S (eds) Eucalypts in India. Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun, pp 149–184.Search in Google Scholar

Larcombe MJ, Vaillancourt RE, Jones RC, Potts BM (2014) Assessing a bayesian approach for detecting exotic hybrids between plantation and native eucalypts, International Journal of Forestry Research, vol. 2014, Article ID 650202, 13 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/650202.10.1155/2014/650202Search in Google Scholar

Lefevre F (2004) Human impacts on forest genetic resources in the temperate zone: An updated review. For Ecol Manag197: 257–271.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.01710.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.017Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Leite SMM, Mori ES, do Valle CF, Bonine CAV, Marino CL (2008) RAPD analysis of genetic variability in a multiprovenance base population of Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden. R. Árvore, Viçosa-MG, 32(6): 961-967.https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-6762200800060000110.1590/s0100-67622008000600001Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Leksono B, Kurinobu S, Ide Y (2008) Realised genetic gains observed in second generation seedling seed orchards of Eucalyptus pellita in Indonesia. J For Res 13:110–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-008-0061-010.1007/s10310-008-0061-0Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Li Y, Suontama M, Burdon RD, Dungey HS (2017) Genotype by environment interactions in forest tree breeding: review of methodology and perspectives on research and application. Tree Genet Genomes13: 60 – 77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-017-1144-x10.1007/s11295-017-1144-xApri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Libby WJ, McCutchan BG, Millar CI (1981) Inbreeding depression in selfs of redwood. Silvae Genet 30:15–25.Search in Google Scholar

Lindgren D (2003) Low-input tree breeding strategies. In: Wei RP, Xu D (eds) Eucalyptus plantations–research, management and development. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 149–16610.1142/9789812704504_0013Search in Google Scholar

Lindgren D, Mullin TJ (1998) Relatedness and status number in seed orchard crops. Can. J. For. Res. 28: 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1139/x97-21710.1139/x97-217Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lindgren D, Gea L, Jefferson P (1996) Loss of genetic diversity monitored by status number. Silvae Genet 45:52-59.Search in Google Scholar

Lu W, Arnold RJ, Zhang L, Luo J (2018) Genetic diversity and structure through three cycles of a Eucalyptus urophylla S.T.Blake breeding program. Forests 9: 372-392. https://doi.org/10.3390/f907037210.3390/f9070372Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Luo JZ, Arnold RJ, Cao JG, Lu WH, Ren SQ, Xie YJ, Xu LA (2012) Variation in pulp wood traits between eucalypt clones across sites and implications for deployment strategies. J Trop For Sci 24(1): 70–82.Search in Google Scholar

Lyngdoh N, Joshi G, Ravikanth G, Vasudeva R, Uma Shaanker R (2013) Changes in genetic diversity parameters in unimproved and improved populations of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) in Karnataka state, India. J Genet 92(1):141-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-013-0226-210.1007/s12041-013-0226-223640419Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mora F, Saavedra J (2012) Combining genetic gain and diversity under an individual selection method in a selected provenance of Eucalyptus cladocalyx. Plant Breeding, Genetic and Genetic Resources Cien. Inv. Agr. 39(1):177-184.https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-1620201200010001410.4067/s0718-16202012000100014Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nagabhushana K, Prasad SH, Rajkumar R (2017) Intra and intergeneric transferable gene-derived orthologous microsatellite markers in Eucalyptus and Corymbia species. J For Res 22 (1), 65-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2016.126272610.1080/13416979.2016.1262726Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Na SJ, Lee HS, Han SU, Park JM, Kang KS (2015) Estimation of genetic gain and diversity under various genetic thinning scenarios in a breeding seed orchard of Quercus acutissima. Scand J For Res. 30: 377–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.101893610.1080/02827581.2015.1018936Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nicodemus A, Varghese M, Nagarajan B, Lindgren D (2009) Annual fertility variation in clonal seed orchards of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) and its impact on seed crop. Silvae Genet 58: 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2009-001110.1515/sg-2009-0011Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Park JM, Kwon SH, Lee HJ, Na SJ, El-Kassaby YA,Kang KS (2017) Integrating fecundity variation and genetic relatedness in estimating the gene diversity of seed crops: Pinus koraiensis seed orchard as an example. Can J For Res 47:366–370. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2016-022310.1139/cjfr-2016-0223Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinformatics 28, 2537-2539. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts46010.1093/bioinformatics/bts460346324522820204Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Pegg RE, Wang GX (1994) Results of Eucalyptus pellita trials at Dongmen, China. In: Brown, A.G. (ed.) Australian tree species research in China: Proceedings of and international workshop held at Zhangzhou, Fujian Province, PRC, 2-5 November, ACIAR Proceedings No. 48. ACIAR, Canberra, pp.108–115.Search in Google Scholar

Poltry SNM, Zelener M, Traverso JR, Gelid P, Hopp HE (2003) Selection of a seed orchard of Eucalyptus dunnii based on genetic diversity criteria calculated using molecular markers. Tree Physiol 23: 625-632. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/23.9.62510.1093/treephys/23.9.62512750055Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Porth I, El-Kassaby YA (2014) Assessment of the genetic diversity in forest tree populations using molecular markers. Diversity 2014 (6): 283-295. https://doi.org/10.3390/d602028310.3390/d6020283Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rao VR, Hodgkin T (2002) Genetic diversity and conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources. Plant Cell Tiss Org 68: 1–19.10.1023/A:1013359015812Search in Google Scholar

Resende RT, Soares AAV, Forrester DI, Marcatti GE, dos Santos AR, Takahashi EK, Silva FF, Grattapaglia D, Resende MDV, Leite HG (2018) Environmental uniformity, site quality and tree competition interact to determine stand productivity of clonal Eucalyptus. Forest Ecol Manag 410: 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.03810.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.038Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Retief ECL, Stanger TK (2009) Genetic parameters of pure and hybrid populations of Eucalyptus grandis and E. urophylla and implications for hybrid breeding strategy, South For 71(2): 133 - 140.https://doi.org/10.2989/sf.2009. DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ritland K (2002) Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88 (4):221-228.https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.680002910.1038/sj.hdy.680002911920127Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Silva PHM, Brune A, Pupin S, Moraes MLT, Sebbenn AM, de Paula RC (2018) Maintenance of genetic diversity in Eucalyptus urophylla S. T. Blake populations with restriction of the number of trees per family. Silvae Genet 67:34 – 40. https://doi.org/10.2478/sg-2018-000510.2478/sg-2018-0005Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sumathi M, Yasodha R (2014) Microsatellite resources of Eucalyptus: current status and future perspectives. Bot Stud 55:73-88. http://www.asbotanicalstudies.com/content/55/1/7310.1186/s40529-014-0073-3543031828510953Search in Google Scholar

Tambarussi EV, Boshier D, Vencovsky R, Menezes Freitas ML, Sebbenn AM (2017) Inbreeding depression from selfing and mating between relatives in the Neotropical tree Cariniana legalis Mart. Kuntze. Conservation Genetics 18(1): 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-016-0896-410.1007/s10592-016-0896-4Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Varghese M, Nicodemus A, Nagarajan B, Subramanian K (2000) Hybrid breakdown in Mysore gum and need for genetic improvement of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and E. tereticornis. In: Hybrid Breeding and Genetics of Forest Trees, Proceedings QFRI/CRC-SPF Symposium, 9-14 April 2000, Noosa, Queensland, Australia. (Compiled by Dungey, H. S., Dieters, M. J. and Nikles, D. G.) Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, pp 519-525Search in Google Scholar

Varghese M, Ravi N, Son SG, Lindgren D (2003) Variation in fertility and its impact on gene diversity in a seedling seed orchard of Eucalyptus tereticornis In: Wei RP, Xu D (eds) Eucalyptus Plantations - Research, Management and Development. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 111-126.https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812704504_001010.1142/9789812704504_0010Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Varghese M, Harwood CE, Bush DJ, Baltunis B, Kamalakannan R, Suraj PG, Hegde D, Meder R (2017) Growth and wood properties of natural provenances, local seed sources and clones of Eucalyptus camaldulensis in southern India: implications for breeding and deployment. New For. 48(1):67-82.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-016-9556-210.1007/s11056-016-9556-2Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Varghese M, Harwood CE, Hegde R, Ravi N (2008) Evaluation of provenances of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and clones of E. camaldulensis and E. tereticornis at contrasting sites in southern India. Silvae Genet 57:170–179.https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2008-002610.1515/sg-2008-0026Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Varghese M, Kamalakannan R, Harwood CE, Lindgren D, McDonald MW (2009) Changes in growth performance and fecundity of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and E. tereticornis during domestication in southern India. Tree Genet Genomes 5(4): 629-640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-009-0215-z10.1007/s11295-009-0215-zApri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Varghese M, Nicodemus A, Nagarajan B, Lindgren D (2006) Impact of fertility variation on gene diversity and drift in two clonal seed orchards of teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.). New For. 31: 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-005-2178-810.1007/s11056-005-2178-8Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

White DA, McGrath JF, Ryan MG, Battaglia M, Mendham DS, Kinal J, Downes GM, Crombie DS, Hunt ME (2014) Managing for water-use efficient wood production in Eucalyptus globulus plantations. For Ecol Manag 331:272–280.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.08.02010.1016/j.foreco.2014.08.020Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Williams CG, Savolainen O (1996) Inbreeding depression in conifers: Implications for breeding strategy. Forest Science 42:102–117.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang L, Huanqiong N, Gapare WJ, Dillon SK, Li X, Wu HX (2014) Comparison of allelic diversity between native gene resource plantings and selections in open-pollinated progeny test of Pinus radiata D. Don. Silvae Genet 63(5): 213-221. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2014-002710.1515/sg-2014-0027Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zelener N, Poltri SN, Bartoloni N, Lopez CR, Hopp HE (2005) Selection strategy for a seedling seed orchard design based on trait selection index and genomic analysis by molecular markers: a case study for Eucalyptus dunnii. Tree Physiol 25:1457–1467. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.11.145710.1093/treephys/25.11.145716105813Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zhu Y, Wu S, Xu J, Lu Z, Li G, Hu Y, Yang X, Bush D (2017) Genetic parameters for growth traits and stem-straightness in Eucalyptus urophylla x E. camaldulensis hybrids from a reciprocal mating design. Euphytica (2017) 213:142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-1923-310.1007/s10681-017-1923-3Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD

Pianifica la tua conferenza remota con Sciendo