[
Abdel-Radi, N. (2021). Science fiction cinema in science education and the development of future thinking visions....Aspirations. Journal of Research in Curriculum, Instruction and Educational Technology, 7(3), 165-187. https://doi.org/10.21608/JRCIET.2021.181582
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Genç, M., Ata, A. O., Ertuğrul, D., Sakmen, G., vd. (2020). ORTAOKUL ÖĞRENCİLERİ İÇİN STEAM’A YÖNELİK TUTUM ÖLÇEĞİ GELİŞTİRİLMESİ. Anadolu Öğretmen Dergisi, 4(2), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.35346/aod.768364
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sakmen, G., Genç, M., & Arslan, H. Ö. (2020). ORTAOKUL 6. SINIF ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN BİR SOSYOBİLİMSEL KONU OLAN ORGAN BAĞIŞI HAKKINDAKİ GÖRÜŞLERİ. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 33(2), 346-371. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.620652
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barnett, M., & Kafka, A. (2007). Using science fiction movie scenes to support critical analysis of science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(4), 31–35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42992940
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barnett, M., Wagner, H., Gatling, A., Anderson, J., Houle, M., & Kafka, A. (2006). The impact of science fiction film on student understanding of science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0956-006-9001-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bondi, B. A., Monani, S. B., Principato, S., & Barlett, C. (2021). Examining the impact of climate change film as an educational tool. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 20(3), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2020.1780997
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57-71). American Psychological Association.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cavanaugh, T. (2002). Science fiction and science education. Science Scope, 25(6), 64–69. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43178982
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christenson, N., Chang Rundgren, S. N., & Zeidler, D. L. (2014). The relationship of discipline back ground to upper secondary students’ argumentation on socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 581-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9394-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. International Pearson Merril Prentice Hall.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de Oliveira Moraes, I., Aires, R. M., & de Souza Góes, A. C. (2021). Science fiction and science education: 1984 in classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 43(15), 2501–2515. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1972488
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dikmenli, Y., Öztürk Demirbaş, Ç. & Gafa, İ. (2019). Instructors’ view towards nuclear energy in Turkey. Gazi Journal of Educational Science, 5 (SI), 254-272. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gebd/issue/49407/581771
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289-2315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667582
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eş, H., Mercan, S. I. & Ayas, C. (2016). A new socio-scientific issue for Turkey: Life with nuclear. Turkish Journal of Education, 5(2), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.92919
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glesne, C. (2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction, 5th edition. Pearson New Jersey.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kavurmacı, M., Karabulut, N., & Koç, A. (2014). The knowledge and views of university students about organ donation. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing, 11(2), 15-21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khishfe, R. F., & Lederman, N. G. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: ıntegrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20137
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laprise, S., & Winrich, C. (2010). The impact of science fiction films on student interest in science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(2), 45–49. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42993855
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, Y. C. (2007). Developing decision-making skills for socio-scientific issues. Journal of Biological Education, 41(4), 170-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2007.9656093
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levin, L. G. & De Filippo, D. (2014). Films and Science: Quantification and analysis of the use of Science Fiction films in scientific papers. Journal of Science Communication, 13(03), A07. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13030207
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Knippels, M. C. P. J., Severiens, S. E., & Klop, T. (2009) Education through Fiction: Acquiring opinion‐forming skills in the context of genomics. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 2057-2083, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802345888
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Melo E Silva M., De Barros MDM, & De La Rocque LR. (2017). The socio-scientific issues in the film Elysium: connections between science and citizenship on the “school floor”. Demetra: Food, Nutrition & Health, 12(3), 561-574. https://doi.org/10.12957/demetra.2017.28749
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MoNE (Ministry of National Education) (2013). Ilköğretim kurumları (ilkokullar ve ortaokullar) fen bilimleri dersi (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı. [Foundational Education Institutions (Primary Schools and Middle Schools) Science (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. Grades) Curriculum]. Ankara, Turkey.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Öztürk, N., Eş, H., & Turgut, H. (2017). How gifted students reach decisions in socio-scientific issues? Warrants, information sources and role of media. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(4), 1111-1124. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2017.04.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peters, H. P. (2013). Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(3), 14102-14109.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sadler, T. D. & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Temizkan, G. (2006). Tıpta genetik mühendisliği uygulamaları ve etik. (Genetic engineering applications and ethics in medicine). Proceedings of the 2nd Medical Ethics and Medical Law Symposium with International Participation. Istanbul.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tetik, S., & Cebesoy, Ü. B. (2018). Middle school students’ opinions about organ donation and transplantation. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 11(3), 486-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.356798
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thomson, A., Bridgstock, R., & Willems, C. (2014). “Teachers flipping out” beyond the online lecture: Maximising the educational potential of video. Journal of Learning Design, 7(3), 67-78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wijnker, W., Bakker, A., van Gog, T., & Drijvers, P. (2019). Educational videos from a film theory perspective: Relating teacher aims to video characteristics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3175–3197. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12725
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yager, S.O., Yager, R.E. & Lim, G. (2006). The advantages of an STS approach over a Typical textbook dominated approach in middle school science. School Science and Mathematics, 106(5), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb18083.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yavuz Topaloğlu, M. (2019). An analysis of the effect of out-of-school learning environment on the opinions of students about genetically modified organisms (GMO’S). Anatolian Journal of Teacher, 3(2), 160-183. https://doi.org/10.35346/aod.624072
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zeidler, D.L., Sadler, T.D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B.E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20281
]Search in Google Scholar
e 