Login
Registrati
Reimposta password
Pubblica & Distribuisci
Soluzioni Editoriali
Soluzioni di Distribuzione
Temi
Architettura e design
Arti
Business e Economia
Chimica
Chimica industriale
Farmacia
Filosofia
Fisica
Geoscienze
Ingegneria
Interesse generale
Legge
Letteratura
Linguistica e semiotica
Matematica
Medicina
Musica
Scienze bibliotecarie e dell'informazione, studi library
Scienze dei materiali
Scienze della vita
Scienze informatiche
Scienze sociali
Sport e tempo libero
Storia
Studi classici e del Vicino Oriente antico
Studi culturali
Studi ebraici
Teologia e religione
Pubblicazioni
Riviste
Libri
Atti
Editori
Blog
Contatti
Cerca
EUR
USD
GBP
Italiano
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrello
Home
Riviste
Radiology and Oncology
Volume 58 (2024): Numero 2 (June 2024)
Accesso libero
The therapeutic effect of ultrasound targeted destruction of schisandrin A contrast microbubbles on liver cancer and its mechanism
Xiaohui Wang
Xiaohui Wang
,
Feng Wang
Feng Wang
,
Pengfei Dong
Pengfei Dong
e
Lin Zhou
Lin Zhou
| 07 mar 2024
Radiology and Oncology
Volume 58 (2024): Numero 2 (June 2024)
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Sommario
Articolo
Immagini e tabelle
Bibliografia
Autori
Articoli in questo Numero
Anteprima
PDF
Cita
CONDIVIDI
Article Category:
Research Article
Pubblicato online:
07 mar 2024
Pagine:
221 - 233
Ricevuto:
20 set 2023
Accettato:
26 dic 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0019
Parole chiave
ultrasonic targeted destruction
,
schisandrin A contrast microbubbles
,
liver cancer
,
mechanism of action
© 2024 Xiaohui Wang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
FIGURE 1.
Analytical characterization of Span and polyethylene glycol (Span-PEG) microbubbles loaded with schisandrin A (A) The structure SEM of schisandrin A microbubbles; (B) The particle size distribution; (C) Zeta potential of schisandrin A microbubbles, (n = 6).
FIGURE 2.
The Walker-256 cell survival rate of schisandrin A (n = 6; compared with control group [0 μg/mL], **P < 0.01).
FIGURE 3.
Anti-tumor cell experiment assessment in different groups (n = 6; *Compared with C group, P < 0.01; &Compared with D group, P < 0.01; #Compared with U+D group, P < 0.01)
FIGURE 4.
The content of schisandrin A in the cells of each group (A. Chromatogram of standard schisandrin A; B. Chromatogram of blank intracellular fluid; C. Chromatogram of blank intracellular solution + standard schisandrin A; D. Chromatogram of the tested intracellular liquid; E. Comparison of drug concentrations between different groups, n = 6; **Compared with C group P < 0.001; ##Compared with D group P < 0.001)
FIGURE 5.
The changes in tumor size before and after drug treatment detected by Ultrasound images (n = 6; *Compared with Pre-treatment group, P < 0.05; **Compared with Pre-treatment group, P < 0.01).
FIGURE 6.
Detection of serum inflammatory factors (tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α], interleukin-6 [IL-6], interleukin-1β [IL-1β]) in different group (n = 6, *Compared with C group, P < 0.01; #Compared with D+U group, P < 0.01; &Compared with M+U group, P < 0.01).
FIGURE 7.
Histopathological changes in different groups (division of the tumor cell nucleus [red arrows], hyperplasia of collagen fibers [green arrows], necrosis of tumor cells [yellow arrows], and balloon-like swelling of tumor cells [blue arrows]).
FIGURE 8.
Immunohistochemical changes in different groups.
FIGURE 9.
The expression of hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), vascular endothlial growth factor (VEGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) proteins in the tumor tissues (n = 6, *Compared with C group, P < 0.01; #Compared with D+U group, P < 0.01; &Compared with M+U group, P < 0.01)
FIGURE 10.
Protein expression results of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway in tumor tissues (n = 6, *Compared with Control, P < 0.05; **Compared with Control, P < 0.01).
Loading rate of schisandrin A in Span and polyethylene glycol (Span-PEG) composite microbubbles
Number of experiments
Absorbance value
Rate of load/%
1
0.524
8.68
2
0.536
8.88
3
0.541
8.96
Mean
0.534
8.84
SD
0.009
0.14
Anteprima