Connexion
S'inscrire
Réinitialiser le mot de passe
Publier & Distribuer
Solutions d'édition
Solutions de distribution
Thèmes
Architecture et design
Arts
Business et économie
Chimie
Chimie industrielle
Droit
Géosciences
Histoire
Informatique
Ingénierie
Intérêt général
Linguistique et sémiotique
Littérature
Mathématiques
Musique
Médecine
Pharmacie
Philosophie
Physique
Sciences bibliothécaires et de l'information, études du livre
Sciences des matériaux
Sciences du vivant
Sciences sociales
Sport et loisirs
Théologie et religion
Études classiques et du Proche-Orient ancient
Études culturelles
Études juives
Publications
Journaux
Livres
Comptes-rendus
Éditeurs
Blog
Contact
Chercher
EUR
USD
GBP
Français
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Panier
Home
Journaux
Radiology and Oncology
Édition 58 (2024): Edition 2 (June 2024)
Accès libre
The therapeutic effect of ultrasound targeted destruction of schisandrin A contrast microbubbles on liver cancer and its mechanism
Xiaohui Wang
Xiaohui Wang
,
Feng Wang
Feng Wang
,
Pengfei Dong
Pengfei Dong
et
Lin Zhou
Lin Zhou
| 07 mars 2024
Radiology and Oncology
Édition 58 (2024): Edition 2 (June 2024)
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Résumé
Article
Figures et tableaux
Références
Auteurs
Articles dans cette édition
Aperçu
PDF
Citez
Partagez
Article Category:
Research Article
Publié en ligne:
07 mars 2024
Pages:
221 - 233
Reçu:
20 sept. 2023
Accepté:
26 déc. 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0019
Mots clés
ultrasonic targeted destruction
,
schisandrin A contrast microbubbles
,
liver cancer
,
mechanism of action
© 2024 Xiaohui Wang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
FIGURE 1.
Analytical characterization of Span and polyethylene glycol (Span-PEG) microbubbles loaded with schisandrin A (A) The structure SEM of schisandrin A microbubbles; (B) The particle size distribution; (C) Zeta potential of schisandrin A microbubbles, (n = 6).
FIGURE 2.
The Walker-256 cell survival rate of schisandrin A (n = 6; compared with control group [0 μg/mL], **P < 0.01).
FIGURE 3.
Anti-tumor cell experiment assessment in different groups (n = 6; *Compared with C group, P < 0.01; &Compared with D group, P < 0.01; #Compared with U+D group, P < 0.01)
FIGURE 4.
The content of schisandrin A in the cells of each group (A. Chromatogram of standard schisandrin A; B. Chromatogram of blank intracellular fluid; C. Chromatogram of blank intracellular solution + standard schisandrin A; D. Chromatogram of the tested intracellular liquid; E. Comparison of drug concentrations between different groups, n = 6; **Compared with C group P < 0.001; ##Compared with D group P < 0.001)
FIGURE 5.
The changes in tumor size before and after drug treatment detected by Ultrasound images (n = 6; *Compared with Pre-treatment group, P < 0.05; **Compared with Pre-treatment group, P < 0.01).
FIGURE 6.
Detection of serum inflammatory factors (tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α], interleukin-6 [IL-6], interleukin-1β [IL-1β]) in different group (n = 6, *Compared with C group, P < 0.01; #Compared with D+U group, P < 0.01; &Compared with M+U group, P < 0.01).
FIGURE 7.
Histopathological changes in different groups (division of the tumor cell nucleus [red arrows], hyperplasia of collagen fibers [green arrows], necrosis of tumor cells [yellow arrows], and balloon-like swelling of tumor cells [blue arrows]).
FIGURE 8.
Immunohistochemical changes in different groups.
FIGURE 9.
The expression of hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), vascular endothlial growth factor (VEGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) proteins in the tumor tissues (n = 6, *Compared with C group, P < 0.01; #Compared with D+U group, P < 0.01; &Compared with M+U group, P < 0.01)
FIGURE 10.
Protein expression results of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway in tumor tissues (n = 6, *Compared with Control, P < 0.05; **Compared with Control, P < 0.01).
Loading rate of schisandrin A in Span and polyethylene glycol (Span-PEG) composite microbubbles
Number of experiments
Absorbance value
Rate of load/%
1
0.524
8.68
2
0.536
8.88
3
0.541
8.96
Mean
0.534
8.84
SD
0.009
0.14
Aperçu