Accesso libero

Breast cancer risk based on adapted IBIS prediction model in Slovenian women aged 40–49 years - could it be better?

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Gavin A, Visser O, Bray F, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Eur J Cancer 2018; 103: 356-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.005FerlayJColombetMSoerjomataramIGavinAVisserOBrayFCancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018Eur J Cancer20181033568710.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.00530100160Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zadnik V, Žagar T. SLORA: Slovenia and Cancer. Epidemiology and Cancer Registry. Institute of Oncology Ljubljana. [cited: 2019 Dec 20 ]. Available from: www.slora.siZadnikVŽagarTSLORA: Slovenia and Cancer. Epidemiology and Cancer RegistryInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana. [cited: 2019 Dec 20 ]Available fromwww.slora.siSearch in Google Scholar

Cancer in Slovenia 2016. Ljubljana: Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, Slovenian Cancer Registry; 2019.Cancer in Slovenia 2016. Ljubljana: Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, Slovenian Cancer Registry2019Search in Google Scholar

Krajc M. National breast cancer screening programme DORA. Residential public health thesis. [Slovenian]. Ljubljana: Institute of Oncology Ljubljana; 2009. 202 p.KrajcMNational breast cancer screening programme DORA. Residential public health thesis. [Slovenian]LjubljanaInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana2009202Search in Google Scholar

Schünemann HJ, Lerda D, Quinn C, Follmann M, Alonso-Coello P, Giorgi Rossi P, et al. Breast cancer screening and diagnosis: a synopsis of the European Breast Guidelines. Ann Intern Med 2020; 172: 46-56. doi: 10.7326/M19-2125SchünemannHJLerdaDQuinnCFollmannMAlonso-CoelloPGiorgiRossi PBreast cancer screening and diagnosis: a synopsis of the European Breast GuidelinesAnn Intern Med2020172465610.7326/M19-212531766052Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Borštnar S, Blatnik A, Perhavec A, Gazić B, Vidergar-Kralj B, Matos E, et al. Recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of patients with breast cancer (Part 1). [Slovenian]. Onkologija 2019; 23: 40-53. doi: 10.25670/oi2019-006onBorštnarSBlatnikAPerhavecAGazićBVidergar-KraljBMatosERecommendations for diagnosis and treatment of patients with breast cancer (Part 1)[Slovenian]. Onkologija201923405310.25670/oi2019-006onOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Amir E, Freedman OC, Seruga B, Evans DG. Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102: 680-91. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq088AmirEFreedmanOCSerugaBEvansDGAssessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment modelsJ Natl Cancer Inst20101026809110.1093/jnci/djq08820427433Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J. A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med 2004; 23: 1111-30. doi: 10.1002/sim.1668TyrerJDuffySWCuzickJA breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factorsStat Med20042311113010.1002/sim.166815057881Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tice JA, Bissell MCS, Miglioretti DL, Gard CC, Rauscher GH, Dabbous FM, et al. Validation of the breast cancer surveillance consortium model of breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 175: 519-23. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05167-2TiceJABissellMCSMigliorettiDLGardCCRauscherGHDabbousFMValidation of the breast cancer surveillance consortium model of breast cancer riskBreast Cancer Res Treat20191755192310.1007/s10549-019-05167-2713802530796654Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dite GS, MacInnis RJ, Bickerstaffe A, Dowty JG, Allman R, Apicella C, et al. Breast cancer risk prediction using clinical models and 77 independent risk-associated SNPs for women aged under 50 years: Australian breast cancer family registry. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers 2016; 25: 359-65. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0838DiteGSMacInnisRJBickerstaffeADowtyJGAllmanRApicellaCBreast cancer risk prediction using clinical models and 77 independent risk-associated SNPs for women aged under 50 years: Australian breast cancer family registryCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers2016253596510.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0838476754426677205Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Brentnall AR, Harkness EF, Astley SM, Donnelly LS, Stavrinos P, Sampson S, et al. Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort. Breast Cancer Res 2015; 17: 147. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0653-5BrentnallARHarknessEFAstleySMDonnellyLSStavrinosPSampsonSMammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohortBreast Cancer Res20151714710.1186/s13058-015-0653-5466588626627479Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Brentnall AR, Evans DG, Cuzick J. Distribution of breast cancer risk from SNPs and classical risk factors in women of routine screening age in the UK. Br J Cancer 2014; 110: 827-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.747BrentnallAREvansDGCuzickJDistribution of breast cancer risk from SNPs and classical risk factors in women of routine screening age in the UKBr J Cancer2014110827810.1038/bjc.2013.747391512024448363Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zadnik V, Krajc M. Development and implementation of personalised breast cancer risk evaluation tool for Slovenian population. [Slovenian]. Onkologija 2018; 22: 6-10. doi: 10.25670/oi2018-016onZadnikVKrajcMDevelopment and implementation of personalised breast cancer risk evaluation tool for Slovenian population[Slovenian]. Onkologija20182261010.25670/oi2018-016onOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Laitman Y, Simeonov M, Keinan-Boker L, Liphshitz I, Friedman E. Breast cancer risk prediction accuracy in Jewish Israeli high-risk women using the BOADICEA and IBIS risk models. Genet Res (Camb) 2013; 95: 174-7. doi: 10.1017/S0016672313000232LaitmanYSimeonovMKeinan-BokerLLiphshitzIFriedmanEBreast cancer risk prediction accuracy in Jewish Israeli high-risk women using the BOADICEA and IBIS risk modelsGenet Res (Camb)201395174710.1017/S001667231300023224506973Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Quante AS, Whittemore AS, Shriver T, Strauch K, Terry MB. Breast cancer risk assessment across the risk continuum: genetic and nongenetic risk factors contributing to differential model performance. Breast Cancer Res 2012; 14: R144. doi: 10.1186/bcr3352QuanteASWhittemoreASShriverTStrauchKTerryMBBreast cancer risk assessment across the risk continuum: genetic and nongenetic risk factors contributing to differential model performanceBreast Cancer Res201214R14410.1186/bcr3352405313223127309Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Stevanato KP, Pedroso RB, Iora P, dos Santos L, Castilho Pelloso F, de Melo WA, et al. Comparative analysis between the Gail, Tyrer-Cuzick and BRCAPRO models for breast cancer screening in Brazilian population. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2019; 20: 3407-13. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.11.3407StevanatoKPPedrosoRBIoraPdos SantosLCastilhoPelloso Fde MeloWAComparative analysis between the Gail, Tyrer-Cuzick and BRCAPRO models for breast cancer screening in Brazilian populationAsian Pac J Cancer Prev20192034071310.31557/APJCP.2019.20.11.3407706301031759366Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Weiss A, Grossmith S, Cutts D, Mikami SA, Suskin JA, Knust Graichen M, et al Customized breast cancer risk assessment in an ambulatory clinic: a portal for identifying women at risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 175: 229-37. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-05116-5WeissAGrossmithSCuttsDMikamiSASuskinJAKnustGraichen MCustomized breast cancer risk assessment in an ambulatory clinic: a portal for identifying women at riskBreast Cancer Res Treat20191752293710.1007/s10549-018-05116-530666540Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Coopey SB, Acar A, Griffin M, Cintolo-Gonzalez J, Semine A, Hughes KS. The impact of patient age on breast cancer risk prediction models. Breast J 2018; 24: 592-8. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12976CoopeySBAcarAGriffinMCintolo-GonzalezJSemineAHughesKSThe impact of patient age on breast cancer risk prediction modelsBreast J201824592810.1111/tbj.1297629316072Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Allman R, Dite GS, Hopper JL, Gordon O, Starlard-Davenport A, Chlebowski R, et al. SNPs and breast cancer risk prediction for African American and Hispanic women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 154: 583-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3641-7AllmanRDiteGSHopperJLGordonOStarlard-DavenportAChlebowskiRSNPs and breast cancer risk prediction for African American and Hispanic womenBreast Cancer Res Treat2015154583910.1007/s10549-015-3641-7466121126589314Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mean age of women at birth of first child, 2017. Eurostat. [cited: 2019 Dec 20]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/DDN-20190318-1?fbclid=IwAR0j_8KDUqMFY-Tca_wqFn3qHVxk-g4lPSeZb2Vg2zGrBh_B5K8r4hOI-HysMean age of women at birth of first child2017Eurostat[cited: 2019 Dec 20]. Available athttps://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/DDN-20190318-1?fbclid=IwAR0j_8KDUqMFY-Tca_wqFn3qHVxk-g4lPSeZb2Vg2zGrBh_B5K8r4hOI-HysSearch in Google Scholar

Bucchi L, Ravaioli A, Baldacchini F, Giuliani O, Mancini S, Vattiato R, et al. Annual mammography at age 45-49 years and biennial mammography at age 50-69 years: comparing performance measures in an organised screening setting. Eur Radiol 2019; 29: 5517-27. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06050-wBucchiLRavaioliABaldacchiniFGiulianiOManciniSVattiatoRAnnual mammography at age 45-49 years and biennial mammography at age 50-69 years: comparing performance measures in an organised screening settingEur Radiol20192955172710.1007/s00330-019-06050-w30887204Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

van den Ende C, Oordt-Speets AM, Vroling H, van Agt HME. Benefits and harms of breast cancer screening with mammography in women aged 40-49 years: a systematic review. Int J Cancer 2017; 141: 1295-306. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30794vanden Ende COordt-SpeetsAMVrolingHvanAgt HMEBenefits and harms of breast cancer screening with mammography in women aged 40-49 years: a systematic reviewInt J Cancer2017141129530610.1002/ijc.3079428542784Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, Fishell EK, Little LE, Miller AB, et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian national breast screening study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 670-5. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.9.670BoydNFByngJWJongRAFishellEKLittleLEMillerABQuantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian national breast screening studyJ Natl Cancer Inst199587670510.1093/jnci/87.9.6707752271Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 227-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062790BoydNFGuoHMartinLJSunLStoneJFishellEMammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancerN Engl J Med20073562273610.1056/NEJMoa06279017229950Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, Parekh N, Salane M, Brinton LA, et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 1622-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.21.1622ByrneCSchairerCWolfeJParekhNSalaneMBrintonLAMammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause statusJ Natl Cancer Inst1995871622910.1093/jnci/87.21.16227563205Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mavaddat N, Pharoah PDP, Michailidou K, Tyrer J, Brook MN, Bolla MK, et al. Prediction of breast cancer risk based on profiling with common genetic variants. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107: djv036. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv036MavaddatNPharoahPDPMichailidouKTyrerJBrookMNBollaMKPrediction of breast cancer risk based on profiling with common genetic variantsJ Natl Cancer Inst2015107djv03610.1093/jnci/djv036475462525855707Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rudolph A, Song M, Brook MN, Milne RL, Mavaddat N, Michailidou K, et al. Joint associations of a polygenic risk score and environmental risk factors for breast cancer in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Int J Epidemiol 2018; 47: 526-36. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx242RudolphASongMBrookMNMilneRLMavaddatNMichailidouKJoint associations of a polygenic risk score and environmental risk factors for breast cancer in the Breast Cancer Association ConsortiumInt J Epidemiol2018475263610.1093/ije/dyx242591360529315403Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Brentnall AR, Evans DG, Cuzick J. Distribution of breast cancer risk from SNPs and classical risk factors in women of routine screening age in the UK. Br J Cancer 2014; 110: 827-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.747BrentnallAREvansDGCuzickJDistribution of breast cancer risk from SNPs and classical risk factors in women of routine screening age in the UKBr J Cancer2014110827810.1038/bjc.2013.747391512024448363Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Vachon CM, Scott CG, Tamimi RM, Thompson DJ, Fasching PA, Stone J, et al. Joint association of mammographic density adjusted for age and body mass index and polygenic risk score with breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res 2019; 21: 68. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1138-8VachonCMScottCGTamimiRMThompsonDJFaschingPAStoneJJoint association of mammographic density adjusted for age and body mass index and polygenic risk score with breast cancer riskBreast Cancer Res2019216810.1186/s13058-019-1138-8653218831118087Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zhang X, Rice M, Tworoger SS, Rosner BA, Eliassen AH, Tamimi RM, et al. Addition of a polygenic risk score, mammographic density, and endogenous hormones to existing breast cancer risk prediction models: A nested case-control study. PLoS Med 2018; 15: e1002644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002644ZhangXRiceMTworogerSSRosnerBAEliassenAHTamimiRMAddition of a polygenic risk score, mammographic density, and endogenous hormones to existing breast cancer risk prediction models: A nested case-control studyPLoS Med201815e100264410.1371/journal.pmed.1002644612280230180161Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Brentnall AR, van Veen EM, Harkness EF, Rafiq S, Byers H, Astley SM, et al. A case-control evaluation of 143 single nucleotide polymorphisms for breast cancer risk stratification with classical factors and mammographic density. Int J Cancer 2020; 146: 2122-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32541BrentnallARvan VeenEMHarknessEFRafiqSByersHAstleySMA case-control evaluation of 143 single nucleotide polymorphisms for breast cancer risk stratification with classical factors and mammographic densityInt J Cancer20201462122910.1002/ijc.32541706506831251818Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1581-3207
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Medicine, Clinical Medicine, Internal Medicine, Haematology, Oncology, Radiology