MRI and 11C acetate PET/CT for prediction of regional lymph node metastasis in newly diagnosed prostate cancer
, , , , , , e
24 gen 2018
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Categoria dell'articolo: Research Article
Pubblicato online: 24 gen 2018
Pagine: 90 - 97
Ricevuto: 31 ago 2017
Accettato: 15 nov 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2018-0001
Parole chiave
© 2018 Catrin von Below, Cecilia Wassberg, Rafael Grzegorek, Joel Kullberg, Charlotta Gestblom, Jens Sörensen, Mauritz Waldén, Håkan Ahlström
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
MRI DWI and 11C Acetate PET/CT variables dichotomized with ROC curve and analyzed with multiple logistic regression
Model Model one through ten: presented with OR (95%CI), p-value. | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M5 | M6 | M7 | M8 | M9 | M10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.7 | 4.1 | 8.4 | 2.7 | |||||||
LN-ADCmean 10-6 mm2 /s | (1.1–13.3), | (1.1–14.7), | (1.8–39.0), | (0.8–9.5), | ||||||
0.040 | 0.032 | 0.007 | 0.110 | |||||||
5.6 | 2.7 | 4.7 | 2.3 | |||||||
LN-SUVmax | (1.5–20.6), | (0.6-11.1), | (1.1-20.5), | (0.5-10.7), | ||||||
0.010 | 0.179 | 0.040 | 0.30 | |||||||
5.7 | 3.7 | 6.2 | 2.8 | |||||||
LN-shape | (1.5–21.2), | (0.9–15.0), | (1.4–27.2), | (0.5–14.7), | ||||||
0.010 | 0.069 | 0.016 | 0.226 | |||||||
6.8 | 5.3 | 3.9 | 4.5 | |||||||
MRI T-stage T3b T3a is not presented in the table, this is because it is not significant in any of the ten models above. | (1.1–41.6), | (1.0–28.6), | (0.7–22.0), | (0.8–25.2), | ||||||
0.039 | 0.051 | 0.126 | 0.083 | |||||||
7.5 | 4.8 | 3.8 | 9.3 | |||||||
LN-size mm | (1.4–40.3), | (0.7-34.7), | (0.4-31.6), | (1.4-61.1), | ||||||
0.018 | 0.116) | 0.224 | 0.020 | |||||||
Nagelkerke’s R2 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.22 | 0.33 | 0.23 | 0.34 | |
AUC | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.75 | |
Sensitivity | 72 | 74 | 67 | 63 | 65 | 68 | 74 | 74 | 74 | |
Specificity | 68 | 68 | 77 | 65 | 66 | 72 | 65 | 68 | 73 | |
PPV | 52 | 56 | 80 | 40 | 60 | 75 | 52 | 56 | 70 | |
NPV | 83 | 82 | 62 | 68 | 62 | 79 | 71 | 82 | 76 | |
Cramers’V Multicollinearity | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.25 | 0.54 | 0.28 | 0.66 | 0.37 | 0.72 | 0.34 |
Accuracy | 69 | 70 | 71 | 69 | 64 | 68 | 66 | 70 | 73 |
Investigational findings at MRI DWI and 11C Acetate PET/CT
MRI DWI and 11C Acetate PET/CT findings | |
---|---|
LN-ADCmean 10-6 mm2 /s, mean (SD) range | 917 (191) 582–1398 |
LN-SUVmax, mean (SD) range | 1.8 (1.2) 0.7–5.9 |
LN size mm, mean (SD) range | 6.6 (3.7) 3.8–28.3 |
Proportion of LNs with round shape, | 19 |
Proportion of LNs with oval shape, | 34 |
MRI T-stage, | |
< T3 | 25 |
T3a | 14 |
T3b | 14 |
LN ADC Roi size mm2, median (range) | 42 (16–334) |
Tumor ADC Roi size mm2 | ≥ 80 |
MRI DWI and 11C Acetate PET/CT variables dichotomized using ROC curve and analyzed with simple logistic regression
N0 | N1 | OR | 95%CI | p-value | Threshold | AUC | Pseudo R2 Nagelkerke’s R2 | Sensitivity/Specificity/PPV/NPV | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LN-ADCmean 10-6 mm2 /s | 21 | 19 | 3.6 | 1.1-11.6 | 0.031 | ≤ 800 | 0.65 | 0.12 | 58/ |
LN-SUVmax | 28 | 25 | 5.4 | 1.6-18.7 | 0.008 | ≥ 1.6 | 0.68 | 0.18 | 72/68/52/83 |
LN-size mm | 28 | 25 | 8.7 | 1.7–44.9 | 0.010 | ≥ 7.9 | 0.66 | ||
LN round shape | 5 | 14 | 5.9 | 1.7-20.4 | 0.006 | 74/68/56/82 | |||
LN oval shape | 23 | 11 | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref |
MRI-T-stage | |||||||||
≤ T2 | 18 | 7 | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref |
T3a | 7 | 7 | 2.00 | 0.4-10.5 | 0.412 | ||||
T3b | 3 | 11 | 6.0 | 1.2-29.4 | 0.027 | 0.17 | 65/67/65/67 |
Patient characteristics
Patient characteristics | |
---|---|
Patients, | 53 |
Age, median (range) | 68 (55–76) |
LN positive patients, | 26 |
PSA level ng/ml, mean (median, range) | 24 (19, 3–112) |
Biopsy Gleason score, | |
6 | 5 (9.4) |
7 | 39 (73.6) |
8 | 5 (9.4) |
9 | 4 (7.5) |
D’Amico risk classification, | |
Intermediate | 6 (11.3) |
High | 47 (88.7) |
Clincal T-stage, | |
T1c | 1 (1.9) |
T2 | 11 (20.8) |
T3 | 41 (77.4) |
Risk of LN invasion Calculated according to Briganti nomogram (26) | |
19–59% | 27 |
≥ 60% | 26 |