Comparison of In-Hospital Complications Following Hybrid Versus Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Elderly Patients with Osteoarthritis
Pubblicato online: 15 mag 2025
Pagine: 8 - 12
Ricevuto: 16 mar 2025
Accettato: 19 apr 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/prolas-2025-0002
Parole chiave
© 2025 Kirills Kopiks et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The use of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly patients is associated with a higher risk of early periprosthetic femoral fractures, while cemented femoral components increase the risk of bone cement implantation syndrome. This study compared in-hospital complications following hybrid versus cementless THA in elderly patients with osteoarthritis. A retrospective review of cases from February 2012 to June 2023 was performed using data from the Hospital of Trauma-tology and Orthopaedics arthroplasty registry. Only primary THAs for osteoarthritis were included. A total of 773 (84.9%) patients underwent hybrid THA with cemented femoral fixation, while 138 (15.1%) underwent cementless THA. The hybrid group was older (median = 72.4 vs. 68.2 years, p < 0.001), had higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status scores (range 1–4 vs. 1–3, p = 0.022), more frequent walking aid use (46.4% vs. 21.7%, p 0.001), more preoperative thromboprophylaxis (54.7% vs. 44.9%, p = 0.034), and longer operative times (median = 80 vs. 74 minutes, p = 0.001). The overall complication rate was higher in the hybrid group (56.9% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.033). Haemodynamic reactions during acetabular cup implantation occurred more frequently in the hybrid group (29.1% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.001).