[Actiņš, A., Lūsēns, M., Rudoviča, V., Vīksna, A., Zariņa, G. (2009). Rīgas Sv. Ģertrūdes baznīcas kapsētas augsnes paraugu ķīmiskā sastāva izpēte [The study of chemical composition of soil samples from Riga St Gertrude’s Church cemetery]. In: Senā Rīga 6: Pilsētas arheoloģija, arhitektūra (59.–70. lpp). Rīga: Latvijas vēstures institūta apgāds (in Latvian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ascádi, G., Nemeskéri, J. (1970). History of Human Lifespan and Mortality. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brickley, M., Ives, R. (2008). The Bioarchaeology of Metabolic Bone Disease. Oxford: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bauer, C. M., Niederstätter, H., McGlynn, G., Stadler, H., Parson, W. (2013). Comparison of morphological and molecular genetic sex-typing on mediaeval human skeletal remains. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 7 (6), 581–586.10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.05.005382002023941903]Search in Google Scholar
[Brooks, S., Suchey, J. M. (1990). Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: A comparison of the Acsadi-Nemeskeri and Suchey-Brooks methods. Hum. Evol., 5, 227–238.10.1007/BF02437238]Search in Google Scholar
[Bruzek, J. (2002). A method for visual determination of sex, using the human hip bone. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 117, 157–168.10.1002/ajpa.1001211815949]Search in Google Scholar
[Buckberry, J. L., Chamberlain, A. T. (2002). Age estimation from the auricular surface of the ilium: A revised method. J. Phys. Anthropol., 119, 231–239.10.1002/ajpa.1013012365035]Search in Google Scholar
[Buikstra, J. E., Ubelaker, D. H. (1994). Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Proceedings of a Seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History (Arkansas Archaeological Survey Research Series, Vol. 33). Fayetteville: Arkansas Archeological Survey. 218 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cox, M., Mays, S. (2000). Human Osteology in Archaeology and Forensic Science. Greenwich Medical Media Ltd, London. 548 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Donoghue, H. D. (2008). Molecular palaeopathology of human infectious disease. In: Advances of Human Palaeopathology. Phinasi, R., Mays, S. (eds.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., pp. 147–176.]Search in Google Scholar
[Genove´s, S. (1959). L’estimation des diffe´rences sexuelles dans l’os coxal; differences me´triques et diffe´rences morphologiques [The estimation of sex differences in the hip bone; metric and morphological differences]. Bull. Mem. Soc. Anthropol. Paris, 10, 3–95 (in French).]Search in Google Scholar
[Grigorenko, A. P., Borinskaya, S. A., Yankovsky, N. K., Rogaev, E. I. (2009). Achievements and peculiarities in studies of ancient DNA and DNA from complicated forensic specimens. Acta Naturae, 1 (3), 58–69.10.32607/20758251-2009-1-3-58-69]Search in Google Scholar
[Haas-Rochholz, H., Weiler, G. (1997) Additional primer sets for an amelogenin gene PCR-based DNA-sex test. Int. J. Legal Med., 110 (6), 312–315.10.1007/s0041400500949387013]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoyme, L. E., Iscan, M. Y. (1989). Determination of sex and race: Accuracy and assumptions. In: Reconstruction of Life from the Skeleton. Iscan, M. Y., Kennedy, K. A. D. (eds.). New York: Wiley & Sons, pp. 53–93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Li, S., Feng, T., Fu, L., Li, Z., Lou, C., Zhang, X., Ma, C., Cong, B. (2012). Pyrosequencing of a short fragment of the amelogenin gene for gender identification. Mol. Biol. Rep., 39 (6), 6949–6957.10.1007/s11033-012-1522-222311027]Search in Google Scholar
[Lovejoy, C. O., Meindl, R. S., Mensforth, R. P., Barton, T. J. (1985) Multifactorial determination of skeletal age at death: A method and blind tests of its accuracy. Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop., 68, 1–14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lūsēns, M. (2008). Arheoloģiskie pētījumi Sv. Ģertrūdes baznīcas kapsētā Rīgā [Archaeological studies of St Gertrude Church cemetery in Riga]. In: Arheologu pētījumi Latvijā 2006. un 2007. gadā. Zinātne, Rīga, pp. 143–151 (in Latvian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Mannucci, A., Sullivan, K. M., Ivanov, P. L., Gill, P. (1994) Forensic application of a rapid and quantitative DNA sex test by amplification of the X-Y homologous gene amelogenin. Int. J. Leg. Med., 106, 190–193.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mays, S. (1992). Taphonomic factors in a human skeletal assemblage. Circaea, 9(2), 54–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meindl, R. S., Lovejoy, C. O. (1985). Ectocranial suture closure: A revised method for the determination of skeletal age at death based on the lateral–anterior sutures. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 8, 57–66.10.1002/ajpa.13306801064061602]Search in Google Scholar
[Milner, G. R. (1992). Determination of Skeletal Age and Sex. Manual prepared for the Dickson Mounds skeletal reburial project. Springfield: Illinois State Museum,]Search in Google Scholar
[Phenice, T. W. (1969). A newly developed visual methods of sexing the os pubis. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 30, 297–301.10.1002/ajpa.13303002145772048]Search in Google Scholar
[Santos, F. R., Pandya, A., Tyler-Smith, C. (1998). Reliability of DNA-based sex tests. Nat. Genet.18, 103.10.1038/ng0298-1039462733]Search in Google Scholar
[Saunders, S. R., Fitzgerald, C., Rogers, T., Dudar, C., McKillop, H. (1992). A test of several methods of skeletal age estimation using a documented archaelogical sample. Can. Soc. For. Sci., 25, 97–118.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spirģis, R. (2012). Rīgas Sv. Pētera baznīcas kapsētas apbedījumu stratigrāfija [Stratigraphy of the Riga’s St. Peter's Church cemetery burial]. In: Senā Rīga 7: Pētījumi pilsētas arheoloģijā un vēsturē (179.–225. lpp.). Rīga: Latvijas vēstures institūta apgāds (in Latvian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Stojanowski, C. M., Seidemann, R. M., Doran, G. H. (2002). Differential skeletal preservation at Windover Pond: Causes and consequences. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 119, 15–26.10.1002/ajpa.1010112209570]Search in Google Scholar
[Tozzo, P., Giuliodori, A., Corato, S., Ponzano, E., Rodriguez, D., Caenazzo, L. (2013). Deletion of amelogenin Y-locus in forensics: Literature revision and description of a novel method for sex confirmation. J. Forensic. Leg. Med., 20 (5), 387–391.10.1016/j.jflm.2013.03.01223756502]Search in Google Scholar
[Waldron, T. (1987). The relative survival of the human skeleton: Implications for palaeopathology. In: Death, Decay and Reconstruction: Approaches to Archaeology and Forensic Science (pp. 55–64). Manchester: Manchester University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willerslev, E., Cooper, A. (2005). Ancient DNA. Proc. R. Soc., 272, 3–16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ye, J., Ji, A., Parra, E. J., Zheng, X., Jiang, C., Zhao, X., Hu, L., Tu, Z. (2004). A simple and efficient method for extracting DNA from old and burned bone. J. Forensic. Sci., 49 (4), 754–759.10.1520/JFS2003275]Search in Google Scholar
[Zapico, S. C., Ubelaker, D. H. (2013). Sex determination from dentin and pulp in a medicolegal context. J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 144 (12), 1379–1385.10.14219/jada.archive.2013.007424282268]Search in Google Scholar