Determination of the Effects of the Pre-Outfitting and Pre-Piping Assembly Operations on Shipyard Productivity

1. Frankel E.G.: Impact of technological change on shipbuildingproductivity, Journal of Ship Production, 1, 3, 174-183, 1985.10.5957/jsp.1985.1.3.174Search in Google Scholar

2. Inozu B., et al.: New horizons for shipbuilding processimprovement, Journal of Ship Production, 22, 2, 87-98, 2006.10.5957/jsp.2006.22.2.87Search in Google Scholar

3. Eker E.: The application of the process improvement concept onthe paint works, MSc Thesis, ITU Institute of Science, Istanbul, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

4. Hardwick M., Kassel B., Crump B. and Garret S.: Improvingshipyard manufacturing processes using STEP-NC, Journal of Ship Production, 21, 3, 170-176, 2005.10.5957/jsp.2005.21.3.170Search in Google Scholar

5. DiBarra C.: 5S-A tool for culture change in shipyards, Journal of Ship Production, 18, 3, 143-151, 2002.10.5957/jsp.2002.18.3.143Search in Google Scholar

6. Odabasi A.Y., Alkaner S., Olcer A. and Sukas N.: Reengineeringof small and medium-sized ship production facilities: Anexample for Turkish Shipbuilding industry, Journal of Ship Production, 13, 1, 8-15, 1997.10.5957/jsp.1997.13.1.8Search in Google Scholar

7. Odabasi A.Y., et al.: Development and evaluation of MarmaraShipyard’s expansion program, Contract Report, Istanbul, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

8. Larson T., and Tice J.: Lean and EMS Integration Workshop, Environmental Technologies, Ship Production Panels, USA, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

9. Lamb T.: Simulation-based performance improvement forshipbuilding processes, Journal of Ship Production, Vol. 22, No. 2, May, pp.49-65, 2006.10.5957/jsp.2006.22.2.49Search in Google Scholar

10. Shin J.G.: A modeling and simulation of production process insubassembly lines at a shipyard, Journal of Ship Production, Vol.20, No.2, May, pp.79-83, 2004.10.5957/jsp.2004.20.2.79Search in Google Scholar

11. Shin J.G.: A concept and framework for a shipyard layout designbased on simulation, Journal of Ship Production, Vol.25, No.3, August, pp.126-135, 2009.10.5957/jsp.2009.25.3.126Search in Google Scholar

12. Alkaner S.: The Modelling and Analysis of Ship Production withSimulation: Case Study, PhD Thesis, ITU Institute of Science, Istanbul, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

13. Greenwood A.G., Hill H.W.: Simulation Optimization DecisionSupport System for Ship Panel Shop Operations, Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 2078-2086, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

14. Kelton W.D., Sadowski R.P. and Sturrock D.T.: Simulation withArena, Third edition, McGraw-Hill, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

15. Fafandjel N., et al.: Procedure for measuring shipbuildingprocess optimization results after using modular outfittingconcept, Urednistvo Casopisa Strojartvo, 50, 3, 141-150, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

16. Yu H. and Ishida K.: The evaluation of the effectivenessof modular outfitting of engine room machines, Fourth International Conference on Marine Technology, 23-25 May, Poland, 391-399, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

17. Baade R., et al.: Modular outfitting, Journal of Ship Production, 14, 3, 170-179, 1998.10.5957/jsp.1998.14.3.170Search in Google Scholar