[Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (3): 425–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667105.10.2307/2667105]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, Ph., Tushman, M.L. (2001). Organizational Environments and Industry Exit: The Effects of Uncertainty, Munificence and Complexity. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10 (3): 675-711. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.3.675.10.1093/icc/10.3.675]Search in Google Scholar
[Borgonovo, E., Peccati, L. (2004). Sensitivity Analysis in Investment Project Evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 90 (1): 17–25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borgonovo, E., Peccati, L. (2006). Uncertainty and Global Sensitivity Analysis in the Evaluation of Investment Projects. International Journal of Production Economics, Strategic Issues and Innovation in Production Economics, 104 (1): 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.05.024.10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.05.024]Search in Google Scholar
[Carlsson, Ch., Fullér, R., Heikkilä, M., Majlender, P. (2007). “A Fuzzy Approach to R&D Project Portfolio Selection.” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Fuzzy Decision-Making Applications, 44 (2): 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2006.07.003.10.1016/j.ijar.2006.07.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Cooper, R.G., Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1995). Benchmarking the Firm’s Critical Success Factors in New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12 (5): 374–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(95)00059-3.10.1111/1540-5885.1250374]Search in Google Scholar
[Cox, J.C., Ross, S.A., Rubinstein, M. (1979). Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (3): 229–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(79)90015-1.10.1016/0304-405X(79)90015-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Dodgson, M., Rothwell, R. (1991). External Linkages and Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. SSRN Scholarly Paper, ID 1506762. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1506762.]Search in Google Scholar
[Freeman, Ch., Soete, L. (1997). The Economics of Industrial Innovation - 3rd Edition. Third edition edition. Cambridge, Mass: The M.I.T. Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haahtela, T.J. (2010). Regression Sensitivity Analysis for Cash Flow Simulation Based Real Option Valuation. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Sixth International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output, 2 (6): 7670–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.171.10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.171]Search in Google Scholar
[Haaker, M.P.R., Verheijen P.J.T. (2004). Local and Global Sensitivity Analysis for a Reactor Design with Parameter Uncertainty. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 82 (5): 591–98. https://doi.org/10.1205/026387604323142630.10.1205/026387604323142630]Search in Google Scholar
[Ho, Sh.H., Liao, Sh.H. (2011). A Fuzzy Real Option Approach for Investment Project Valuation. Expert Syst. Appl., 38: 15296–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.010.10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Jerrard, R., Hands, D. eds. (2007). Design Management: Exploring Fieldwork and Applications. 1 edition. London; New York, NY: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jovanović, P. (1999). Application of Sensitivity Analysis in Investment Project Evaluation under Uncertainty and Risk. International Journal of Project Management, 17 (4): 217–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00035-0.10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00035-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., Tolga, E. (2002). Capital Budgeting Techniques Using Discounted Fuzzy versus Probabilistic Cash Flows. Information Sciences, 142 (1–4): 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0255(02)00157-3.10.1016/S0020-0255(02)00157-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahraman, C. (2008). Fuzzy Engineering Economics with Applications. Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-70810-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Keizera, J.A., Halman, J.I.M., Song, M. (2002). From Experience: Applying the Risk Diagnosing Methodology. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19 (3): 213–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(02)00138-8.10.1111/1540-5885.1930213]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, Y.J, Vonortas, N.S. (2014). Managing Risk in the Formative Years: Evidence from Young Enterprises in Europe. Technovation, Risk and Uncertainty Management in Technological Innovation, 34 (8): 454–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.05.004.10.1016/j.technovation.2014.05.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Klingelhöfer, H.E. (2009). Investments in EOP-Technologies and Emissions Trading – Results from a Linear Programming Approach and Sensitivity Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 196 (1): 370–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.03.016.10.1016/j.ejor.2008.03.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Mansor, N., Yahaya, S., Okazaki, K. (2016). Risk Factors Affecting New Product Development (NPD) Performance In Small Medium Enterprises (SMES), International journal of recent research and applied studies, 27(1): 8. https://www.arpapress.com/Volumes/Vol27Issue1/IJRRAS_27_1_03.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer, M.H., Roberts, E.B. (1986). New Product Strategy in Small Technology-Based Firms: A Pilot Study. Management Science, 32 (7): 806–21.]Search in Google Scholar
[Milliken, F.J. (1987). Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty about the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty. The Academy of Management Review, 12 (1): 133–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/257999.10.2307/257999]Search in Google Scholar
[Moenaert, R.K., De Meyer, A., Souder W.E., Deschoolmeester, D. (1995). R D/Marketing Communication during the Fuzzy Front-End. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42 (3): 243–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.403743.10.1109/17.403743]Search in Google Scholar
[Moskowitz, H.R., Saguy, I. S., Straus, T. eds. (2009). An Integrated Approach to New Food Product Development. 0 ed. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420065558.10.1201/9781420065558]Search in Google Scholar
[Mu J., Peng G., MacLachlan D.L. (2009). Effect of Risk Management Strategy on NPD Performance. Technovation, 29 (3): 170–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.07.006.10.1016/j.technovation.2008.07.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Muzzioli, S., Reynaerts, H. (2008). American Option Pricing with Imprecise Risk-Neutral Probabilities. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Special Section on Logical Approaches to Imprecise Probabilities and Special Section on Imprecise Probabilities in Finance and Economics, 49 (1): 140–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2007.06.011.10.1016/j.ijar.2007.06.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Muzzioli, S., Torricelli, C. (2004). A Multiperiod Binomial Model for Pricing Options in a Vague World. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Financial decision models in a dynamical setting, 28 (5): 861–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1889(03)00060-5.10.1016/S0165-1889(03)00060-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Park, Y.H. (2010). A Study of Risk Management and Performance Measures on New Product Development. Asian Journal on Quality, 11 (1): 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/15982681011051813.10.1108/15982681011051813]Search in Google Scholar
[Perez-Villarreal, B., Pozo, R. (1992). Ripening of the Salted Anchovy (Engraulis Encrasicholus): Study the Sensory, Biochemical and Microbiological Aspects. Developments in Food Science. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201301770474.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sabovics, M., Mugurevics, A., Silovs, M., Dmitrijeva, O. (2019a). Development of Technology and Recepies of Baltic Anchovy in Oil Preserves (Salted Products) and Baltic Anchovies Paste from Sprattus Balticus as Analogous to Traditional Italian Canned Anchovies in Oil and Mechanization of Technological Processes for Their Production”, project no. 17-00-F01101-000003, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sabovics, M., Pilvere, I., Muizniece-Brasava, S., Silovs, M., Dmitrijeva, O. (2019b). Baltic sprat (Sprattus sprattus balticus) as a raw material for developing “anchovy” analogue. In: 19th International multidisciplinary scientific GeoConference SGEM 2019: conference proceedings, Albena, Bulgaria, 9-11 December, 2019/Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia, 2019. Vol.19, Issue 6.3: Micro and nano technologies. Advances in biotechnology. Green buildings technologies and materials. Green design and sustainable architecture; pp.43.-50. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85092461894&partnerID=40&md5=2862942d40932719fd7159140870beef ISBN 9786197408997.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sari, I.D., Kuchta, D. (2012). Fuzzy Global Sensitivity Analysis of Fuzzy Net Present Value. Control and Cybernetics, Vol. 41, no. 2: 481–96.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sheen, J.N. (2005). Fuzzy Evaluation of Cogeneration Alternatives in a Petrochemical Industry. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 49 (5): 741–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2004.10.035.10.1016/j.camwa.2004.10.035]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor, R.B., West, T.M. (1992). Development of a Spreadsheet-Based Capital Investment Model with Sensitivity Analysis. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 23 (1–4): 431–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-8352(92)90153-B.10.1016/0360-8352(92)90153-B]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Groenendaal, W.J.H., Kleijnen, J.P.C. (2002). Deterministic versus Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis in Investment Problems: An Environmental Case Study. European Journal of Operational Research 141 (1): 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00236-3.10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00236-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Yeo, K. T., Qiu, F. (2003). The Value of Management Flexibility – a Real Option Approach to Investment Evaluation. International Journal of Project Management, 21 (4): 243–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00025-X.10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00025-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8 (3): 338–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X]Search in Google Scholar