Optimization of the biofuel production by idealized fermentation of the animal manure, chicken wastes, and sewage sludge

1. Akin, M., Bartkiene, E., Fatih Özogul, F., Eyduran, S.P., Trif, M., Lorenzo J.M. & Rocha J.M. (2023). Conversion of organic wastes into biofuel by microorganisms: A bibliometric review. Clean. Circul. Bioeconom. (6), 100053. DOI: 10.1016/j.clcb.2023.100053. Search in Google Scholar

2. Aziz, T., Shah, Z., Sarwar, A., Ullah, N., Khan, A.A., Sameeh, M.Y., Haiying, C. & Lin, L. (2023). Production of bioethanol from pretreated rice straw, an integrated and mediated upstream fermentation process. Biomass. Conver. Biorefin. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-023-04283-w. Search in Google Scholar

3. IRENA. (2018). International Renewable Energy Agency. Report about Renewable Energy Outlook: Egypt ISBN 978-92-9260-069-3, p.-W.I.O. Search in Google Scholar

4. Szostek, M., Kaniuczak, J., Hajduk, E., Stanek-Tarkowska, J., Jasiński, T., Niemiec, W. & Smusz, R. (2018). Effect of sewage sludge on the yield and energy value of the aboveground biomass of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Archiv. Environ. Protec. 44(3), 42–50. DOI: 10.24425/122285. Search in Google Scholar

5. De Almeida, M.A. & Colombo, R. (2021). Production chain of first-generation sugarcan bioethanol: Characterization and value-added application of wastes. BioEner. Res. 1–16. DOI: 10.1007/s12155-021-10301-4 Search in Google Scholar

6. Hawrot-Paw, M., Koniuszy, A., Zając, G., Szyszlak-Bargłowicz, J. & Jaklewicz, J. (2020). Production of second generation bioethanol from straw during simultaneous microbial saccharification and fermentation. Archiv. Environ. Protec. 48(1), 47–52. DOI: 10.24425/aep.2020.132525. Search in Google Scholar

7. Perveen, I., Bukhari, B., Sarwar, A., Aziz, T., Koser, N., Younis, H., Ahmad, Q., Sabahat, S., Tzora, A. & Skoufos, I. (2023). Applications and efficacy of traditional to emerging trends in lactofermentation and submerged cultivation of edible mushrooms. Biomass. Conver. Biorefin. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-023-04694-9. Search in Google Scholar

8. Leta, D., Solomon, L., Chavan, R.B., Daniel, M. & Anbessa, D. (2015). Production of Biogas from Fruit and Vegetable Wastes Mixed with Different Wastes. Environ. Ecol. Res. 3(3), 65–71. DOI: 10.13189/eer.2015.030303. Search in Google Scholar

9. Kozłowski, K., Dach, J., Lewicki, A., Malińska, K., Paulino do Carmo, I.E. & Czekała, W. (2019). Potential of biogas production from animal manure in Poland. Archiv. Environ. Protec. 45(3), 99–108. DOI: 10.24425/aep.2019.128646. Search in Google Scholar

10. Amir, S. (2005). Contribution à la valorisation de boues de stations d’épuration par compostage: Devenir des micropolluantsmétalliques et organiques et bilanhumique du composté. Doctorat, National Institute of Polytechnique, Toulouse, France, 341. Search in Google Scholar

11. Elsayed, M., Eraky, M., Osman, A., Wang, J., Farghali, M., Rashwan, A.K., Yacoub, I.H., Hanelt, D. & Abomohra, A. (2023). Sustainable valorization of waste glycerol into bioethanol and biodiesel through biocircular approaches: a review. Environ. Chem. Let. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-023-01671-6. Search in Google Scholar

12. Cesaro, A. & Belgiorno, B. (2015). Combined Biogas and Bioethanol Production: Opportunities and Challenges for Industrial Application. Energies. 8(8), 8121–8144. DOI: 10.3390/en8088121 Search in Google Scholar

13. Venko, B. (2017). Hand book, Biogas, Biodiesel and Bioethanol as Multifunctional Renewable fuels and raw Materials. (pp. 5772–5734). Search in Google Scholar

14. Naha, A., Debroy, R., Sharma, D., Shah, M.P. & Nath, S. (2023). Microbial fuel cell: A state-of-the-art and revolutionizing technology for efficient energy recovery. Clean. Circul. Bioeconom. (5), 100050. DOI: 10.1016/j.clcb.2023.100050. Search in Google Scholar

15. Chander, A.M., Singh, N.K. & Venkateswaran, K. (2023). Microbial Technologies in Waste Management, Energy Generation and Climate Change: Implications on Earth and Space. J. Indian Inst. Sci. A Multidiscip. Rev. J. 103(3), 833–838. DOI: 10.1007/s41745-023-00388-3. Search in Google Scholar

16. Dębowski, M., Grala, A., Zieliński, M., Dudek, M. (2022). Efficiency of The Methane Fermentation Process of Macroalgae Biomass Originating From Puck Bay. Archives of Environmental Protection, 38(4), 99–107. DOI: 10.2478/v10265-012-0033-5. Search in Google Scholar

17. Kisielewska, M., Dębowski, M. & Zieliński, M. (2020). Comparison of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of microalgae species belonged to various taxonomic groups. Archiv. Environ. Protec. 46(1), 33–40. DOI 10.24425/aep.2020.132523. Search in Google Scholar

18. Charnay, F. (2005). Compostage des déchetsurbainsdans les Pays en développement :élaborationd’unedémarcheméthodologique pour une production pérenne de compost. Doctorat University of Limoges. Search in Google Scholar

19. Laskri, N. & Nawel, N. (2015). Comparative Study for Biogas Production from Different Wastes. Inter. J. Bio-Sci. Bio-Technol. 7(4), 39–46. DOI: 10.14257/ijbsbt.2015.7.4.05. Search in Google Scholar

20. Batstone, D.J., Keller, J., Angelidaki, I., Kalyuzhnyi, S.V., Pavlostathis, S.G., Rozzi, A., Sanders, W.T.M., Siegrist, H. & Vavilin, V.A. (2002). The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM1). Water Sci. Technol. 45(10), 65–73. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2002.0292. Search in Google Scholar

21. Page, A.L., Miller, R.H. & Keeney, D.R. (1982). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Soil Soc. Amer. Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A. (pp. 310). Search in Google Scholar

22. APHA. (1992). A.P.H., Association, Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. 18th, Washington, D.C. Search in Google Scholar

23. Jodice, R., Luzzati, A. & Nappi, P. (1982). The influence of organic fertilizers, obtained from poplar barks, on the correction of iron chlorosis of Luipinus albus L. Plant. Soil. (65), 309–317. DOI: 10.1007/BF02375052. Search in Google Scholar

24. Richards, L.A. (1954). Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soil. U.S. Dept. Agric. (60), 50–75. Search in Google Scholar

25. Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersy, (pp. 925). Search in Google Scholar

26. Deng, S.P. & Tabatabai, M.A. (1994). Cellulase activity of soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26(10), 1347–1354. DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(94)90216-x. Search in Google Scholar

27. Miller, G.L. (1959). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytic. Chem. 31(3), 426–428. Search in Google Scholar

28. Kunitz, M. (1947). Crystalline Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor, II. General Properties. J. Gener. Physiol. 30(4), 291–310. Search in Google Scholar

29. Caputi, J.A., Ueda, M. & Brown, T. (1968). Spectrophotometric determination of ethanol in wine. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic. 19(3), 160–165. DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1968.19.3.160. Search in Google Scholar

30. Johnson, L.E., Bond, C.J. & Fribourg, H. (1959). Methods for studying soil microflora-plant disease relationships. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Company. Search in Google Scholar

31. Maramba, F.D., Obias, E.D., Julian, B., Taganas, C., Alumbro, R.D. & Judan, A.A. (1978). Biogas and waste recycling, the Philippine experience. Maya farms division, liberity flour mills, Inc. Metro Manila, Philippines. Search in Google Scholar

32. Wujcik, W.J. & Jewell, W.J. (1980). Dry anaerobic fermentation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering Symp., Jon Willey & Sons, Inc. N.Y. 10, 43–65. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6872238. Search in Google Scholar

33. Chomini, M., Ogbonna, C., Falemara, B. & Micah, P. (2015). Effect of codigestion of cow dung and poultry manure on biogas yield, proximate and amino acid contents of their effluents. IOSR J. Agric. Veterin. Sci. 8(11), 48–56. DOI: 10.9790/2380-081114856. Search in Google Scholar

34. Nnabuchi, M., Akubuko, F., Augustine, C. & Ugwu, G. (2012). Assessment of the effect of co-digestion of chicken dropping and cow dung on biogas generation. Glob. J. Sci. Front. Res. Phys. Space Scie. 12(7), Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary? DOI: 10.1.1.349.3196. Search in Google Scholar

35. Afifi, M.M. & Mahmoud, Y.I.S.C. (2020). Biogas generation from co-digestion manure, poultry waste and kitchen refuses. Nation. Egypt. J. Microbiol. 55(1), 94–112. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/nejmi. Search in Google Scholar

36. El-Akshar Y.S. & Faisal H.S.Y. (2020). Anaerobic Digestion of Food Wastes under Different Concentrations of Total Solids. Inter. J. Environ. 9(3), 159–170. DOI: 10.36632/ije/2020.9.3.10. Search in Google Scholar

37. Bajpai, P. (2017). Basics of anaerobic digestion process. In Springer Briefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, Singapore. (pp. 7–12). Search in Google Scholar

38. Khatoon, N., Ullah, N., Sarwar, A., Ur Rahman, S., Khan, A. A., Aziz, T., Alharbi, M. & Alshammari, A. (2023). Isolation and identification of protease-producing Bacillus strain from cold climate soil and optimization of its production by applying different fermentation conditions Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 21(4), 3391–3401. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/2104_33913401. Search in Google Scholar

39. Dinova, N., Belouhova, M., Schneider, I., Rangelov, J. & Topalova, Y. (2018). Control of biogas production process by enzymat and fluorescent image analysis. Biotechnol. Biotechnologic. Equip. 32(2), 366–375. DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2018.1425637. Search in Google Scholar

40. Ullah, N., Ur Rehman, M., Sarwar, A., Nadeem, M., Nelofer, R., Irfan, M., Idrees, M., Ali, U., Naz, S. & Aziz, T. (2023). Effect of bioprocess parameters on alkaline protease production by locally isolated Bacillus cereus AUST7 using tannery waste in submerged fermentation. Biomass. Conver. Biorefin. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-023-04498-x. Search in Google Scholar

41. Alessandra, C. & Vincenzo, B. (2015). Combined Biogas and Bioethanol Production: Opportunities and Challenges for Industrial Application. Energies. (8), 8121–8144. DOI: 10.3390/en8088121 Search in Google Scholar

42. Bochmann, G., Herfellner, T., Susanto, F., Kreuter, F. & Pesta, G. (2018). Application of enzymes in anaerobic digestion. Water Sci. Technol. 56(10), 29–35. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2007.727. Search in Google Scholar