This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Akin, M., Bartkiene, E., Fatih Özogul, F., Eyduran, S.P., Trif, M., Lorenzo J.M. & Rocha J.M. (2023). Conversion of organic wastes into biofuel by microorganisms: A bibliometric review. Clean. Circul. Bioeconom. (6), 100053. DOI: 10.1016/j.clcb.2023.100053.Search in Google Scholar
Aziz, T., Shah, Z., Sarwar, A., Ullah, N., Khan, A.A., Sameeh, M.Y., Haiying, C. & Lin, L. (2023). Production of bioethanol from pretreated rice straw, an integrated and mediated upstream fermentation process. Biomass. Conver. Biorefin. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-023-04283-w.Search in Google Scholar
IRENA. (2018). International Renewable Energy Agency. Report about Renewable Energy Outlook: Egypt ISBN 978-92-9260-069-3, p.-W.I.O.Search in Google Scholar
Szostek, M., Kaniuczak, J., Hajduk, E., Stanek-Tarkowska, J., Jasiński, T., Niemiec, W. & Smusz, R. (2018). Effect of sewage sludge on the yield and energy value of the aboveground biomass of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Archiv. Environ. Protec. 44(3), 42–50. DOI: 10.24425/122285.Search in Google Scholar
De Almeida, M.A. & Colombo, R. (2021). Production chain of first-generation sugarcan bioethanol: Characterization and value-added application of wastes. BioEner. Res. 1–16. DOI: 10.1007/s12155-021-10301-4Search in Google Scholar
Hawrot-Paw, M., Koniuszy, A., Zając, G., Szyszlak-Bargłowicz, J. & Jaklewicz, J. (2020). Production of second generation bioethanol from straw during simultaneous microbial saccharification and fermentation. Archiv. Environ. Protec. 48(1), 47–52. DOI: 10.24425/aep.2020.132525.Search in Google Scholar
Perveen, I., Bukhari, B., Sarwar, A., Aziz, T., Koser, N., Younis, H., Ahmad, Q., Sabahat, S., Tzora, A. & Skoufos, I. (2023). Applications and efficacy of traditional to emerging trends in lactofermentation and submerged cultivation of edible mushrooms. Biomass. Conver. Biorefin. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-023-04694-9.Search in Google Scholar
Leta, D., Solomon, L., Chavan, R.B., Daniel, M. & Anbessa, D. (2015). Production of Biogas from Fruit and Vegetable Wastes Mixed with Different Wastes. Environ. Ecol. Res. 3(3), 65–71. DOI: 10.13189/eer.2015.030303.Search in Google Scholar
Kozłowski, K., Dach, J., Lewicki, A., Malińska, K., Paulino do Carmo, I.E. & Czekała, W. (2019). Potential of biogas production from animal manure in Poland. Archiv. Environ. Protec. 45(3), 99–108. DOI: 10.24425/aep.2019.128646.Search in Google Scholar
Amir, S. (2005). Contribution à la valorisation de boues de stations d’épuration par compostage: Devenir des micropolluantsmétalliques et organiques et bilanhumique du composté. Doctorat, National Institute of Polytechnique, Toulouse, France, 341.Search in Google Scholar
Elsayed, M., Eraky, M., Osman, A., Wang, J., Farghali, M., Rashwan, A.K., Yacoub, I.H., Hanelt, D. & Abomohra, A. (2023). Sustainable valorization of waste glycerol into bioethanol and biodiesel through biocircular approaches: a review. Environ. Chem. Let. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-023-01671-6.Search in Google Scholar
Cesaro, A. & Belgiorno, B. (2015). Combined Biogas and Bioethanol Production: Opportunities and Challenges for Industrial Application. Energies. 8(8), 8121–8144. DOI: 10.3390/en8088121Search in Google Scholar
Venko, B. (2017). Hand book, Biogas, Biodiesel and Bioethanol as Multifunctional Renewable fuels and raw Materials. (pp. 5772–5734).Search in Google Scholar
Naha, A., Debroy, R., Sharma, D., Shah, M.P. & Nath, S. (2023). Microbial fuel cell: A state-of-the-art and revolutionizing technology for efficient energy recovery. Clean. Circul. Bioeconom. (5), 100050. DOI: 10.1016/j.clcb.2023.100050.Search in Google Scholar
Chander, A.M., Singh, N.K. & Venkateswaran, K. (2023). Microbial Technologies in Waste Management, Energy Generation and Climate Change: Implications on Earth and Space. J. Indian Inst. Sci. A Multidiscip. Rev. J. 103(3), 833–838. DOI: 10.1007/s41745-023-00388-3.Search in Google Scholar
Dębowski, M., Grala, A., Zieliński, M., Dudek, M. (2022). Efficiency of The Methane Fermentation Process of Macroalgae Biomass Originating From Puck Bay. Archives of Environmental Protection, 38(4), 99–107. DOI: 10.2478/v10265-012-0033-5.Search in Google Scholar
Kisielewska, M., Dębowski, M. & Zieliński, M. (2020). Comparison of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of microalgae species belonged to various taxonomic groups. Archiv. Environ. Protec. 46(1), 33–40. DOI 10.24425/aep.2020.132523.Search in Google Scholar
Charnay, F. (2005). Compostage des déchetsurbainsdans les Pays en développement :élaborationd’unedémarcheméthodologique pour une production pérenne de compost. Doctorat University of Limoges.Search in Google Scholar
Laskri, N. & Nawel, N. (2015). Comparative Study for Biogas Production from Different Wastes. Inter. J. Bio-Sci. Bio-Technol. 7(4), 39–46. DOI: 10.14257/ijbsbt.2015.7.4.05.Search in Google Scholar
Batstone, D.J., Keller, J., Angelidaki, I., Kalyuzhnyi, S.V., Pavlostathis, S.G., Rozzi, A., Sanders, W.T.M., Siegrist, H. & Vavilin, V.A. (2002). The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM1). Water Sci. Technol. 45(10), 65–73. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2002.0292.Search in Google Scholar
Page, A.L., Miller, R.H. & Keeney, D.R. (1982). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Soil Soc. Amer. Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A. (pp. 310).Search in Google Scholar
APHA. (1992). A.P.H., Association, Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. 18th, Washington, D.C.Search in Google Scholar
Jodice, R., Luzzati, A. & Nappi, P. (1982). The influence of organic fertilizers, obtained from poplar barks, on the correction of iron chlorosis of Luipinus albus L. Plant. Soil. (65), 309–317. DOI: 10.1007/BF02375052.Search in Google Scholar
Richards, L.A. (1954). Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soil. U.S. Dept. Agric. (60), 50–75.Search in Google Scholar
Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersy, (pp. 925).Search in Google Scholar
Deng, S.P. & Tabatabai, M.A. (1994). Cellulase activity of soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26(10), 1347–1354. DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(94)90216-x.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, G.L. (1959). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytic. Chem. 31(3), 426–428.Search in Google Scholar
Kunitz, M. (1947). Crystalline Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor, II. General Properties. J. Gener. Physiol. 30(4), 291–310.Search in Google Scholar
Caputi, J.A., Ueda, M. & Brown, T. (1968). Spectrophotometric determination of ethanol in wine. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic. 19(3), 160–165. DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1968.19.3.160.Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, L.E., Bond, C.J. & Fribourg, H. (1959). Methods for studying soil microflora-plant disease relationships. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar
Maramba, F.D., Obias, E.D., Julian, B., Taganas, C., Alumbro, R.D. & Judan, A.A. (1978). Biogas and waste recycling, the Philippine experience. Maya farms division, liberity flour mills, Inc. Metro Manila, Philippines.Search in Google Scholar
Wujcik, W.J. & Jewell, W.J. (1980). Dry anaerobic fermentation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering Symp., Jon Willey & Sons, Inc. N.Y. 10, 43–65. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6872238.Search in Google Scholar
Chomini, M., Ogbonna, C., Falemara, B. & Micah, P. (2015). Effect of codigestion of cow dung and poultry manure on biogas yield, proximate and amino acid contents of their effluents. IOSR J. Agric. Veterin. Sci. 8(11), 48–56. DOI: 10.9790/2380-081114856.Search in Google Scholar
Nnabuchi, M., Akubuko, F., Augustine, C. & Ugwu, G. (2012). Assessment of the effect of co-digestion of chicken dropping and cow dung on biogas generation. Glob. J. Sci. Front. Res. Phys. Space Scie. 12(7), Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary? DOI: 10.1.1.349.3196.Search in Google Scholar
Afifi, M.M. & Mahmoud, Y.I.S.C. (2020). Biogas generation from co-digestion manure, poultry waste and kitchen refuses. Nation. Egypt. J. Microbiol. 55(1), 94–112. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/nejmi.Search in Google Scholar
El-Akshar Y.S. & Faisal H.S.Y. (2020). Anaerobic Digestion of Food Wastes under Different Concentrations of Total Solids. Inter. J. Environ. 9(3), 159–170. DOI: 10.36632/ije/2020.9.3.10.Search in Google Scholar
Bajpai, P. (2017). Basics of anaerobic digestion process. In Springer Briefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, Singapore. (pp. 7–12).Search in Google Scholar
Khatoon, N., Ullah, N., Sarwar, A., Ur Rahman, S., Khan, A. A., Aziz, T., Alharbi, M. & Alshammari, A. (2023). Isolation and identification of protease-producing Bacillus strain from cold climate soil and optimization of its production by applying different fermentation conditions Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 21(4), 3391–3401. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/2104_33913401.Search in Google Scholar
Dinova, N., Belouhova, M., Schneider, I., Rangelov, J. & Topalova, Y. (2018). Control of biogas production process by enzymat and fluorescent image analysis. Biotechnol. Biotechnologic. Equip. 32(2), 366–375. DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2018.1425637.Search in Google Scholar
Ullah, N., Ur Rehman, M., Sarwar, A., Nadeem, M., Nelofer, R., Irfan, M., Idrees, M., Ali, U., Naz, S. & Aziz, T. (2023). Effect of bioprocess parameters on alkaline protease production by locally isolated Bacillus cereus AUST7 using tannery waste in submerged fermentation. Biomass. Conver. Biorefin. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-023-04498-x.Search in Google Scholar
Alessandra, C. & Vincenzo, B. (2015). Combined Biogas and Bioethanol Production: Opportunities and Challenges for Industrial Application. Energies. (8), 8121–8144. DOI: 10.3390/en8088121Search in Google Scholar
Bochmann, G., Herfellner, T., Susanto, F., Kreuter, F. & Pesta, G. (2018). Application of enzymes in anaerobic digestion. Water Sci. Technol. 56(10), 29–35. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2007.727.Search in Google Scholar