Accesso libero

Social cohesion and an age-friendly environment determine the life satisfaction of elderly people in rural areas: an integrative review of the literature

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

1. Skela Savič B, Zurc J, Hvalič Touzery S. Staranje populacije, potrebe starostnikov in nekateri izzivi za zdravstveno nego. Obzornik zdravstvene nege. 2010; 44(2): 89-100. Search in Google Scholar

2. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Ageing 2020 Highlights: Living arrangements of older persons, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

3. Kaučič BM, Filej B, Ovsenik M. Ageing–a problem or a challenge for modern society. Multicultural Society and Aging–Challenges for Nursing in Europe. Celje: College of Nursing in Celje. 2016; 58-65. Search in Google Scholar

4. Cijan R, Cijan V. Zdravstveni, socialni in pravni vidiki starostnikov. Maribor: Visoka zdravstvena šola, 2003. Search in Google Scholar

5. Kaučič BM. Holistični model za zagotavljanje zadovoljstva z življenjem v starosti: doktorska disertacija. Fakulteta za organizacijske študije. Novo mesto; 2017. Search in Google Scholar

6. O’Boyle CA. Measuring the quality of later life. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences. 1997; 352(1363): 1871-1879. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.017316921249460072 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Marušič U, Milič Žepič Z, Kavčič V. Učinkovitost računalniškega kognitivnega treninga v domovih starejših občanov. Psihološka obzorja. 2021; 30: 47-54.10.20419/2021.30.537 Search in Google Scholar

8. Filipovič Hrast M, Hlebec V. Staranje prebivalstva: oskrba, blaginja in solidarnost: univerzitetni učbenik. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede; 2015. Search in Google Scholar

9. Menec V, Nowicki S. Examining the relationship between communities’ ‘age-friendliness’ and life satisfaction and self-perceived health in rural Manitoba, Canada. 2014;14(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH2594 Search in Google Scholar

10. World Health Organisation. Ageing in life-course. https://www.who.int/ageing/age-friendly-world/en/ (access 2021.1.11). Search in Google Scholar

11. Valenčak S. Kaj je starosti prijazno in kaj ne? Kakovostna starost. 2012; 15(1), 3-19. Search in Google Scholar

12. Statistični urad RS. Število in sestava prebivalstva. https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/Field/Index/17/104 (access 2021.8.1) Search in Google Scholar

13. Praveen V, Rani AM. Quality of life among elderly in a rural area. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 2016; 3(3): 754-757.10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20160646 Search in Google Scholar

14. Bryla M, Burzyñska M, Maniecka-Bryla I. Self-rated quality of life of city-dwelling elderly people benefitting from social help: results of a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013; 11(181): 1-11. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-181381927024168471 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Skevington SM, Lofty M, O’Connell, KA. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOLBREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial: A Report from the WHOQOL Group. Quality of Life Research. 2004; 13, 299-310.10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00 Search in Google Scholar

16. Lah I, Pahor M, Hlebec V. Zdravje starejših ljudi kot element kakovosti življenja v Evropi. Obzornik Zdravstvene Nege. 2008; 42 (2): 87-97. Search in Google Scholar

17. Pahor M, Domanjko B, Hlebec V. Zaznave zdravja in dostopnosti zdravstvenega varstva: mesto Slovenije v evropskih razdeljenostih, 2011 in Mandič S, Filipovič – Hrast M. (ed.) Blaginja pod pritiski demografskih sprememb. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede. 2011; 139-160 Search in Google Scholar

18. Marusič U, Grosprêtre S. Non-physical approaches to counteract age-related functional deterioration: Applications for rehabilitation and neural mechanisms. European Journal of Sport Science. 2018; 18(5): 639-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2018.1447018.29557276 Search in Google Scholar

19. Kaučič BM, Filej B, Ovsenik M. The Influence of Social Factors on Life Satisfaction in Old Age. Revija za univerzalno odličnost. 2016; 5(4): 300-318. Search in Google Scholar

20. Lipar T, Ramovš J. Gerontološko izrazje. Kakovostna starost. 2013; 16(2): 61-63. Search in Google Scholar

21. Cummuns RA, Eckersley R, Pallant J, et al. Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity wellbeing index. Social Indicators Research. 2003; 64(2): 159-190. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024704320683. Search in Google Scholar

22. Berčič H. Kakovostna starost in razvedrilni šport. Vzgoja. 2012; 14(56): 33-35. Search in Google Scholar

23. Torraco RJ. Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human resource development review. 2016; 15(4): 404-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606. Search in Google Scholar

24. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. 2021; Bmj, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.800592433782057 Search in Google Scholar

25. Johnson-Kenneth M, Lichter DT. Rural Depopulation: Growth and Decline Processes over the Past Century. Rural Sociology. 2019; 84 (1): 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12266. Search in Google Scholar

26. Keating N, Eales J, Phillips JE. Age-Friendly Rural Communities: Conceptualizing ‘Best-Fit’. Can J Aging. 2013; 32(4): 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980813000408.24128863 Search in Google Scholar

27. Neville S, Adams J, Napier S, et al. Engaging in my rural community: perceptions of people aged 85 years and over. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being. 2018; 13(1): 1503908-1503908. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1503908.609503930102138 Search in Google Scholar

28. Krawchenko T, Keefe J, Manuel P, et al. Coastal climate change, vulnerability and age friendly communities: Linking planning for climate change to the age friendly communities agenda. Journal of Rural Studies. 2016; 44: 55-62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.013.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.013 Search in Google Scholar

29. Cho M, Jiyoun K. Coupling urban regeneration with age-friendliness: Neighborhood regeneration in Jangsu Village, Seoul. 2016; 58: 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.019. Search in Google Scholar

30. Scharlach AE, Davitt JK, Lehning AJ, et al. Does the Village Model Help to Foster Age-Friendly Communities? Journal of Aging & Social Policy. 2014; 26(1-2): 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.854664.24224776 Search in Google Scholar

31. John DH, Gunter K. engAGE in Community: Using Mixed Methods to Mobilize Older People to Elucidate the Age-Friendly Attributes of Urban and Rural Places. 2016; 35(10): 1095-1120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464814566679.25608869 Search in Google Scholar

32. Freeman S, Marston HR, Olynick J, et al. Intergenerational effects on the impacts of technology use in later life: insights from an international, multi-site study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(16): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165711.745961932784651 Search in Google Scholar

33. Nielson L, Wiles J, Anderson A. Social exclusion and community in an urban retirement village. Journal of Aging Studies. 2019; 49: 25-30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2019.03.003.10.1016/j.jaging.2019.03.00331229215 Search in Google Scholar

34. Phillipson C, Miriam B, Ogg J, et al. The family and community life of older people: Social networks and social support in three urban areas. Psychology Press. 2001; 31(1): 151-185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727940238663X. Search in Google Scholar

35. Victor C. The Social Context of Ageing: A Textbook of Gerontology. New York, 2005.10.4324/9780203338599 Search in Google Scholar

36. Mickus MA, Luz CC. Televisits: sustaining long distance family relationships among institutionalized elders through technology. 2002; 6(4): 387-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360786021000007009.12425772 Search in Google Scholar

37. Nedeljko M, Bogataj D, Kaučič BM. The use of ICT in older adults strengthens their social network and reduces social isolation: Literature Review and Research Agenda. In: Stapleton, L (ed.), Kopacek, P (ed.), Andeeva, Z (ed.). 20th IFAC Conference on Technology, Culture, and International Stability TECIS 2021 Moscow, Russian Federation, 14-17 September 2021 : procedings. New York: International Federation of Automatic Control, 2021. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2021;54(13):645-650. doi: 10.1016/j. ifacol.2021.10.524. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

38. Lajhar M. Kakovost življenja v starosti – vidiki zdravstvene vzgoje. Jesenice, Visoka šola za zdravstveno nego, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

39. Neuberg M, Canjuga I. Procjena kvalitete života starijih osoba. V N. Kregar Velikonja (ed.), Mednarodna znanstvena konferenca: Celostna obravnava pacienta: starostnik v zdravstvenem in socialnem varstvu. Novo mesto: Fakulteta za zdravstvene vede, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

40. Bond J, Corner L. Quality of Life and Older People. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2004. Search in Google Scholar

41. Ljubič A, Kolnik TŠ. Models of care for people with dementia applied in practice. Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku/Nursing in the 21st Century. 2021; 20(2): 122-130. doi:10.2478/pielxxiw-2021-0013. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2450-646X
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Medicine, Assistive Professions, Nursing