Accès libre

Social cohesion and an age-friendly environment determine the life satisfaction of elderly people in rural areas: an integrative review of the literature

À propos de cet article

Citez

1. Skela Savič B, Zurc J, Hvalič Touzery S. Staranje populacije, potrebe starostnikov in nekateri izzivi za zdravstveno nego. Obzornik zdravstvene nege. 2010; 44(2): 89-100. Search in Google Scholar

2. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Ageing 2020 Highlights: Living arrangements of older persons, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

3. Kaučič BM, Filej B, Ovsenik M. Ageing–a problem or a challenge for modern society. Multicultural Society and Aging–Challenges for Nursing in Europe. Celje: College of Nursing in Celje. 2016; 58-65. Search in Google Scholar

4. Cijan R, Cijan V. Zdravstveni, socialni in pravni vidiki starostnikov. Maribor: Visoka zdravstvena šola, 2003. Search in Google Scholar

5. Kaučič BM. Holistični model za zagotavljanje zadovoljstva z življenjem v starosti: doktorska disertacija. Fakulteta za organizacijske študije. Novo mesto; 2017. Search in Google Scholar

6. O’Boyle CA. Measuring the quality of later life. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences. 1997; 352(1363): 1871-1879. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.017316921249460072 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Marušič U, Milič Žepič Z, Kavčič V. Učinkovitost računalniškega kognitivnega treninga v domovih starejših občanov. Psihološka obzorja. 2021; 30: 47-54.10.20419/2021.30.537 Search in Google Scholar

8. Filipovič Hrast M, Hlebec V. Staranje prebivalstva: oskrba, blaginja in solidarnost: univerzitetni učbenik. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede; 2015. Search in Google Scholar

9. Menec V, Nowicki S. Examining the relationship between communities’ ‘age-friendliness’ and life satisfaction and self-perceived health in rural Manitoba, Canada. 2014;14(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH2594 Search in Google Scholar

10. World Health Organisation. Ageing in life-course. https://www.who.int/ageing/age-friendly-world/en/ (access 2021.1.11). Search in Google Scholar

11. Valenčak S. Kaj je starosti prijazno in kaj ne? Kakovostna starost. 2012; 15(1), 3-19. Search in Google Scholar

12. Statistični urad RS. Število in sestava prebivalstva. https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/Field/Index/17/104 (access 2021.8.1) Search in Google Scholar

13. Praveen V, Rani AM. Quality of life among elderly in a rural area. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 2016; 3(3): 754-757.10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20160646 Search in Google Scholar

14. Bryla M, Burzyñska M, Maniecka-Bryla I. Self-rated quality of life of city-dwelling elderly people benefitting from social help: results of a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013; 11(181): 1-11. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-181381927024168471 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Skevington SM, Lofty M, O’Connell, KA. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOLBREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial: A Report from the WHOQOL Group. Quality of Life Research. 2004; 13, 299-310.10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00 Search in Google Scholar

16. Lah I, Pahor M, Hlebec V. Zdravje starejših ljudi kot element kakovosti življenja v Evropi. Obzornik Zdravstvene Nege. 2008; 42 (2): 87-97. Search in Google Scholar

17. Pahor M, Domanjko B, Hlebec V. Zaznave zdravja in dostopnosti zdravstvenega varstva: mesto Slovenije v evropskih razdeljenostih, 2011 in Mandič S, Filipovič – Hrast M. (ed.) Blaginja pod pritiski demografskih sprememb. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede. 2011; 139-160 Search in Google Scholar

18. Marusič U, Grosprêtre S. Non-physical approaches to counteract age-related functional deterioration: Applications for rehabilitation and neural mechanisms. European Journal of Sport Science. 2018; 18(5): 639-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2018.1447018.29557276 Search in Google Scholar

19. Kaučič BM, Filej B, Ovsenik M. The Influence of Social Factors on Life Satisfaction in Old Age. Revija za univerzalno odličnost. 2016; 5(4): 300-318. Search in Google Scholar

20. Lipar T, Ramovš J. Gerontološko izrazje. Kakovostna starost. 2013; 16(2): 61-63. Search in Google Scholar

21. Cummuns RA, Eckersley R, Pallant J, et al. Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity wellbeing index. Social Indicators Research. 2003; 64(2): 159-190. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024704320683. Search in Google Scholar

22. Berčič H. Kakovostna starost in razvedrilni šport. Vzgoja. 2012; 14(56): 33-35. Search in Google Scholar

23. Torraco RJ. Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human resource development review. 2016; 15(4): 404-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606. Search in Google Scholar

24. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. 2021; Bmj, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.800592433782057 Search in Google Scholar

25. Johnson-Kenneth M, Lichter DT. Rural Depopulation: Growth and Decline Processes over the Past Century. Rural Sociology. 2019; 84 (1): 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12266. Search in Google Scholar

26. Keating N, Eales J, Phillips JE. Age-Friendly Rural Communities: Conceptualizing ‘Best-Fit’. Can J Aging. 2013; 32(4): 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980813000408.24128863 Search in Google Scholar

27. Neville S, Adams J, Napier S, et al. Engaging in my rural community: perceptions of people aged 85 years and over. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being. 2018; 13(1): 1503908-1503908. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1503908.609503930102138 Search in Google Scholar

28. Krawchenko T, Keefe J, Manuel P, et al. Coastal climate change, vulnerability and age friendly communities: Linking planning for climate change to the age friendly communities agenda. Journal of Rural Studies. 2016; 44: 55-62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.013.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.013 Search in Google Scholar

29. Cho M, Jiyoun K. Coupling urban regeneration with age-friendliness: Neighborhood regeneration in Jangsu Village, Seoul. 2016; 58: 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.019. Search in Google Scholar

30. Scharlach AE, Davitt JK, Lehning AJ, et al. Does the Village Model Help to Foster Age-Friendly Communities? Journal of Aging & Social Policy. 2014; 26(1-2): 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.854664.24224776 Search in Google Scholar

31. John DH, Gunter K. engAGE in Community: Using Mixed Methods to Mobilize Older People to Elucidate the Age-Friendly Attributes of Urban and Rural Places. 2016; 35(10): 1095-1120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464814566679.25608869 Search in Google Scholar

32. Freeman S, Marston HR, Olynick J, et al. Intergenerational effects on the impacts of technology use in later life: insights from an international, multi-site study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(16): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165711.745961932784651 Search in Google Scholar

33. Nielson L, Wiles J, Anderson A. Social exclusion and community in an urban retirement village. Journal of Aging Studies. 2019; 49: 25-30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2019.03.003.10.1016/j.jaging.2019.03.00331229215 Search in Google Scholar

34. Phillipson C, Miriam B, Ogg J, et al. The family and community life of older people: Social networks and social support in three urban areas. Psychology Press. 2001; 31(1): 151-185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727940238663X. Search in Google Scholar

35. Victor C. The Social Context of Ageing: A Textbook of Gerontology. New York, 2005.10.4324/9780203338599 Search in Google Scholar

36. Mickus MA, Luz CC. Televisits: sustaining long distance family relationships among institutionalized elders through technology. 2002; 6(4): 387-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360786021000007009.12425772 Search in Google Scholar

37. Nedeljko M, Bogataj D, Kaučič BM. The use of ICT in older adults strengthens their social network and reduces social isolation: Literature Review and Research Agenda. In: Stapleton, L (ed.), Kopacek, P (ed.), Andeeva, Z (ed.). 20th IFAC Conference on Technology, Culture, and International Stability TECIS 2021 Moscow, Russian Federation, 14-17 September 2021 : procedings. New York: International Federation of Automatic Control, 2021. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2021;54(13):645-650. doi: 10.1016/j. ifacol.2021.10.524. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

38. Lajhar M. Kakovost življenja v starosti – vidiki zdravstvene vzgoje. Jesenice, Visoka šola za zdravstveno nego, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

39. Neuberg M, Canjuga I. Procjena kvalitete života starijih osoba. V N. Kregar Velikonja (ed.), Mednarodna znanstvena konferenca: Celostna obravnava pacienta: starostnik v zdravstvenem in socialnem varstvu. Novo mesto: Fakulteta za zdravstvene vede, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

40. Bond J, Corner L. Quality of Life and Older People. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2004. Search in Google Scholar

41. Ljubič A, Kolnik TŠ. Models of care for people with dementia applied in practice. Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku/Nursing in the 21st Century. 2021; 20(2): 122-130. doi:10.2478/pielxxiw-2021-0013. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2450-646X
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Medicine, Assistive Professions, Nursing