Management of Truncated Data in Speech Transmission Evaluation for Pupils in Classrooms

[1] Stevens, S.S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103 (2684), 677-680.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Barbato, G., Farné, S., Genta, G. (2008). Management of subjective evaluations represented by ordinal scales. In 12th IMEKO TC1 & TC7 Joint Symposium on Man,Science & Measurement, 3-5 September 2008. IMEKO, 89-94.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Astolfi, A., Bottalico, P., Barbato, G. (2012). Subjective and objective speech intelligibility investigations in primary school classrooms. Journalof Acoustical Society of America, 131 (1), 247-257.10.1121/1.366206022280588Search in Google Scholar

[4] Klein, J.P., Moeschberger, M.L. (2003). SurvivalAnalysis: Techniques for Censored and TruncatedData (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

[5] International Organization for Standardization (2003). Ergonomics-Assessment of speech communication. ISO 9921. Genève.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Houtgast, T., Steeneken, H.J.M. (1971). Evaluation of speech transmission channels by using artificial signals. Acustica, 25, 355-367.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Steeneken, H.J.M., Houtgast, T. (1980). A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 67, 318-326.10.1121/1.3844647354199Search in Google Scholar

[8] European Committee for Standardization (2011). Objective rating of speech intelligibility by speechtransmission index. EN 60268-16. Brussels.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Sato, H., Yoshino, H., Nagatomo, M. (1998). Relationship between speech transmission index and easiness of speech perception in reverberatory fields. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 103 (5), 2999.10.1121/1.421726Search in Google Scholar

[10] Sato, H., Morimoto, M., Sato, H., Wada, M. (2008). Relationship between listening difficulty and acoustical objective measures in reverberant sound fields. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 123 (4), 2087-2093.10.1121/1.288575018397016Search in Google Scholar

[11] Morimoto, M., Sato, H., Kobayashi, M. (2004). Listening difficulty as a subjective measure for evaluation of speech transmission performance in public spaces. Journal of Acoustical Society ofAmerica, 116 (3), 1607-1613.10.1121/1.177527615478426Search in Google Scholar

[12] Sato, H., Bradley, J.S., Morimoto, M. (2005). Using listening difficulty ratings of conditions for speech communication in rooms. Journal of AcousticalSociety of America, 117 (3), 1157-1167.10.1121/1.184993615807005Search in Google Scholar

[13] Prodi, N., Visentin, C., Farnetani, A. (2010). Intelligibility, listening difficulty and listening efficiency in auralized classrooms. Journal ofAcoustical Society of America, 128 (1), 172-181.10.1121/1.343656320649212Search in Google Scholar

[14] Prodi, N., Visentin, C., Feletti, A. (2013). On the perception of speech in primary school classrooms: Ranking of noise interference and of age influence. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 133 (1), 255-268.10.1121/1.477025923297900Search in Google Scholar

[15] International Organization for Standardization (1991). Acoustics - The construction and calibration of speechintelligibility tests. ISO TR 4870. Genève.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Bonaventura, P., Paoloni, A., Canavesio, F., Usai, P. (1986). Development of a diagnostic intelligibility testin the Italian language. Roma: Fondazione Ugo Bordoni. (Technical Report 3C1286).Search in Google Scholar

[17] Aurora site (last viewed February 24, 2013). http://pcfarina.eng.unipr.it/Aurora_XP/STI.htm.Search in Google Scholar

[18] International Organization for Standardization (2009). Acoustics - Measurement of room acoustic parameters- Part 1: Performance spaces. ISO 3382-1. Genève.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Tukey, J.W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Hofmann, D., Linss, G. (2003). Challenges and chances of internet metrology. Measurement ScienceReview, 3 (1), 1-17.Search in Google Scholar

[21] NIST/SEMATECH. e-Handbook of StatisticalMethods. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/, February 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Bork, I. (2000). A comparison of room simulation software: The 2nd round robin on room acoustic computer simulation. Acustica, 86, 943-956.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Johnson, L.G. (1964). Theory and Technique ofVariation Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (2008). Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to theexpression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). JCGM 100:2008. Sèvres.Search in Google Scholar