Login
Registrati
Reimposta password
Pubblica & Distribuisci
Soluzioni Editoriali
Soluzioni di Distribuzione
Temi
Architettura e design
Arti
Business e Economia
Chimica
Chimica industriale
Farmacia
Filosofia
Fisica
Geoscienze
Ingegneria
Interesse generale
Legge
Letteratura
Linguistica e semiotica
Matematica
Medicina
Musica
Scienze bibliotecarie e dell'informazione, studi library
Scienze dei materiali
Scienze della vita
Scienze informatiche
Scienze sociali
Sport e tempo libero
Storia
Studi classici e del Vicino Oriente antico
Studi culturali
Studi ebraici
Teologia e religione
Pubblicazioni
Riviste
Libri
Atti
Editori
Blog
Contatti
Cerca
EUR
USD
GBP
Italiano
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrello
Home
Riviste
Miscellanea Geographica
Volume 24 (2020): Numero 4 (October 2020)
Accesso libero
Consistency of the presentation of forests on topographic maps
Paweł Cebrykow
Paweł Cebrykow
e
Piotr Petrzak
Piotr Petrzak
| 31 ott 2020
Miscellanea Geographica
Volume 24 (2020): Numero 4 (October 2020)
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Sommario
Articolo
Immagini e tabelle
Bibliografia
Autori
Articoli in questo Numero
Anteprima
PDF
Cita
CONDIVIDI
Pubblicato online:
31 ott 2020
Pagine:
202 - 217
Ricevuto:
11 mag 2020
Accettato:
19 giu 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0024
Parole chiave
Topographic maps
,
change in forest coverage
,
forests
,
Roztocze
© 2020 Paweł Cebrykow, Piotr Petrzak, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1
Range of test polygons A, B, C, and DSource: Own work based on the 1:250 000 map from the website – Geoportal 2
Figure 2
Test polygon A, map of the differences in forests coverage between the aerial photograph and the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 3
Study polygon A, relative errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 4
Test polygon A, absolute errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 5
Test polygon A, map of the differences in forest coverage between the aerial photograph and the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 6
Test polygon A, relative errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 7
Test polygon A, absolute errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 8
Test polygon B, map of the differences in forest coverage between the aerial photograph and the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 9
Test polygon B, relative errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 10
Test polygon B, absolute errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 11
Test polygon B, map of the differences in forest coverage between the aerial photograph and the1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 12
Test polygon B, relative errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 13
Test polygon B, absolute errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 14
Test polygon C, differences in the forest coverage between the aerial photograph and topographic maps: to the left the 92 1:10 000 map, and to the right the 1:50 000 VMap Level2 mapSource: Own work
Figure 15
Test polygon C, relative errors for the 1:10 000 in the 92 standard mapSource: Own work
Figure 16
Test polygon C, absolute errors for the 1:10 000 in the 92 standard mapSource: Own work
Figure 17
Test polygon C, relative errors for the VMap L2 1:50 000 mapSource: Own work
Figure 18
Test polygon C, absolute errors for the VMap L2 1:50 000 mapSource: Own work
Figure 19
Test polygon D, differences in the forest coverage between the aerial photograph and topographic maps: the 92 1:10 000 map to the left, and the 1:50 000 VMap Level2 map to the rightSource: Own work
Figure 20
Test polygon D, errors for the 1:10 000 in 92 map system: map of relative errors to the left, map of absolute errors to the rightSource: Own work
Figure 21
Test polygon D, errors for the VMap L2 1:50 000 map: map of relative errors to the left, map of absolute errors to the rightSource: Own work
Total errors in the test polygons for the analysed maps (Source: Own work)
Map
Polygon A
Polygon B
Polygon C
Polygon D
%
ha
%
ha
%
ha
%
ha
Standard 65
1.38
56.42
4.17
125.76
-
-
-
-
GUGIK 80
1.92
78.50
9.85
362.97
-
-
-
-
Standard 92
-
-
-
-
-4.9
-100.36
-1.64
-72.27
VMap L2
-
-
-
-
-9.85
-201.93
-2.64
-116.22
Anteprima