Accesso libero

Consistency of the presentation of forests on topographic maps

Paweł Cebrykow

Paweł Cebrykow

Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Maria Sklodowska UniversityLublin, Poland
Profilo Orcid
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Cebrykow, Paweł
 e 
Piotr Petrzak

Piotr Petrzak

Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Maria Sklodowska UniversityLublin, Poland
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Petrzak, Piotr
  
31 ott 2020
Consistency of the presentation of forests on topographic maps's Cover Image
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Cita
Scarica la copertina
Pubblicato online: 31 ott 2020
Pagine: 202 - 217
Ricevuto: 11 mag 2020
Accettato: 19 giu 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0024
Parole chiave
© 2020 Paweł Cebrykow, Piotr Petrzak, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Figure 1

Range of test polygons A, B, C, and DSource: Own work based on the 1:250 000 map from the website – Geoportal 2
Range of test polygons A, B, C, and DSource: Own work based on the 1:250 000 map from the website – Geoportal 2

Figure 2

Test polygon A, map of the differences in forests coverage between the aerial photograph and the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Test polygon A, map of the differences in forests coverage between the aerial photograph and the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work

Figure 3

Study polygon A, relative errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Study polygon A, relative errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work

Figure 4

Test polygon A, absolute errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Test polygon A, absolute errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work

Figure 5

Test polygon A, map of the differences in forest coverage between the aerial photograph and the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Test polygon A, map of the differences in forest coverage between the aerial photograph and the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work

Figure 6

Test polygon A, relative errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Test polygon A, relative errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work

Figure 7

Test polygon A, absolute errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Test polygon A, absolute errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work

Figure 8

Test polygon B, map of the differences in forest coverage between the aerial photograph and the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Test polygon B, map of the differences in forest coverage between the aerial photograph and the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work

Figure 9

Test polygon B, relative errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Test polygon B, relative errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work

Figure 10

Test polygon B, absolute errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Test polygon B, absolute errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work

Figure 11

Test polygon B, map of the differences in forest coverage between the aerial photograph and the1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Test polygon B, map of the differences in forest coverage between the aerial photograph and the1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work

Figure 12

Test polygon B, relative errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Test polygon B, relative errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work

Figure 13

Test polygon B, absolute errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Test polygon B, absolute errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work

Figure 14

Test polygon C, differences in the forest coverage between the aerial photograph and topographic maps: to the left the 92 1:10 000 map, and to the right the 1:50 000 VMap Level2 mapSource: Own work
Test polygon C, differences in the forest coverage between the aerial photograph and topographic maps: to the left the 92 1:10 000 map, and to the right the 1:50 000 VMap Level2 mapSource: Own work

Figure 15

Test polygon C, relative errors for the 1:10 000 in the 92 standard mapSource: Own work
Test polygon C, relative errors for the 1:10 000 in the 92 standard mapSource: Own work

Figure 16

Test polygon C, absolute errors for the 1:10 000 in the 92 standard mapSource: Own work
Test polygon C, absolute errors for the 1:10 000 in the 92 standard mapSource: Own work

Figure 17

Test polygon C, relative errors for the VMap L2 1:50 000 mapSource: Own work
Test polygon C, relative errors for the VMap L2 1:50 000 mapSource: Own work

Figure 18

Test polygon C, absolute errors for the VMap L2 1:50 000 mapSource: Own work
Test polygon C, absolute errors for the VMap L2 1:50 000 mapSource: Own work

Figure 19

Test polygon D, differences in the forest coverage between the aerial photograph and topographic maps: the 92 1:10 000 map to the left, and the 1:50 000 VMap Level2 map to the rightSource: Own work
Test polygon D, differences in the forest coverage between the aerial photograph and topographic maps: the 92 1:10 000 map to the left, and the 1:50 000 VMap Level2 map to the rightSource: Own work

Figure 20

Test polygon D, errors for the 1:10 000 in 92 map system: map of relative errors to the left, map of absolute errors to the rightSource: Own work
Test polygon D, errors for the 1:10 000 in 92 map system: map of relative errors to the left, map of absolute errors to the rightSource: Own work

Figure 21

Test polygon D, errors for the VMap L2 1:50 000 map: map of relative errors to the left, map of absolute errors to the rightSource: Own work
Test polygon D, errors for the VMap L2 1:50 000 map: map of relative errors to the left, map of absolute errors to the rightSource: Own work

Total errors in the test polygons for the analysed maps (Source: Own work)

MapPolygon APolygon BPolygon CPolygon D
%ha%ha%ha%ha
Standard 651.3856.424.17125.76----
GUGIK 801.9278.509.85362.97----
Standard 92-----4.9-100.36-1.64-72.27
VMap L2-----9.85-201.93-2.64-116.22
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Geoscienze, Geografia, Geoscienze, altro
Feed RSS della rivista