Connexion
S'inscrire
Réinitialiser le mot de passe
Publier & Distribuer
Solutions d'édition
Solutions de distribution
Thèmes
Architecture et design
Arts
Business et économie
Chimie
Chimie industrielle
Droit
Géosciences
Histoire
Informatique
Ingénierie
Intérêt général
Linguistique et sémiotique
Littérature
Mathématiques
Musique
Médecine
Pharmacie
Philosophie
Physique
Sciences bibliothécaires et de l'information, études du livre
Sciences des matériaux
Sciences du vivant
Sciences sociales
Sport et loisirs
Théologie et religion
Études classiques et du Proche-Orient ancient
Études culturelles
Études juives
Publications
Journaux
Livres
Comptes-rendus
Éditeurs
Blog
Contact
Chercher
EUR
USD
GBP
Français
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Panier
Home
Journaux
Miscellanea Geographica
Édition 24 (2020): Edition 4 (October 2020)
Accès libre
Consistency of the presentation of forests on topographic maps
Paweł Cebrykow
Paweł Cebrykow
et
Piotr Petrzak
Piotr Petrzak
| 31 oct. 2020
Miscellanea Geographica
Édition 24 (2020): Edition 4 (October 2020)
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Résumé
Article
Figures et tableaux
Références
Auteurs
Articles dans cette édition
Aperçu
PDF
Citez
Partagez
Publié en ligne:
31 oct. 2020
Pages:
202 - 217
Reçu:
11 mai 2020
Accepté:
19 juin 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0024
Mots clés
Topographic maps
,
change in forest coverage
,
forests
,
Roztocze
© 2020 Paweł Cebrykow, Piotr Petrzak, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1
Range of test polygons A, B, C, and DSource: Own work based on the 1:250 000 map from the website – Geoportal 2
Figure 2
Test polygon A, map of the differences in forests coverage between the aerial photograph and the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 3
Study polygon A, relative errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 4
Test polygon A, absolute errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 5
Test polygon A, map of the differences in forest coverage between the aerial photograph and the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 6
Test polygon A, relative errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 7
Test polygon A, absolute errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 8
Test polygon B, map of the differences in forest coverage between the aerial photograph and the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 9
Test polygon B, relative errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 10
Test polygon B, absolute errors for the 1:50 000 GUGIK 65 mapSource: Own work
Figure 11
Test polygon B, map of the differences in forest coverage between the aerial photograph and the1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 12
Test polygon B, relative errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 13
Test polygon B, absolute errors for the 1:100 000 GUGIK 80 mapSource: Own work
Figure 14
Test polygon C, differences in the forest coverage between the aerial photograph and topographic maps: to the left the 92 1:10 000 map, and to the right the 1:50 000 VMap Level2 mapSource: Own work
Figure 15
Test polygon C, relative errors for the 1:10 000 in the 92 standard mapSource: Own work
Figure 16
Test polygon C, absolute errors for the 1:10 000 in the 92 standard mapSource: Own work
Figure 17
Test polygon C, relative errors for the VMap L2 1:50 000 mapSource: Own work
Figure 18
Test polygon C, absolute errors for the VMap L2 1:50 000 mapSource: Own work
Figure 19
Test polygon D, differences in the forest coverage between the aerial photograph and topographic maps: the 92 1:10 000 map to the left, and the 1:50 000 VMap Level2 map to the rightSource: Own work
Figure 20
Test polygon D, errors for the 1:10 000 in 92 map system: map of relative errors to the left, map of absolute errors to the rightSource: Own work
Figure 21
Test polygon D, errors for the VMap L2 1:50 000 map: map of relative errors to the left, map of absolute errors to the rightSource: Own work
Total errors in the test polygons for the analysed maps (Source: Own work)
Map
Polygon A
Polygon B
Polygon C
Polygon D
%
ha
%
ha
%
ha
%
ha
Standard 65
1.38
56.42
4.17
125.76
-
-
-
-
GUGIK 80
1.92
78.50
9.85
362.97
-
-
-
-
Standard 92
-
-
-
-
-4.9
-100.36
-1.64
-72.27
VMap L2
-
-
-
-
-9.85
-201.93
-2.64
-116.22
Aperçu