Utilisation of Actiphage in combination with IS900 qPCR as a diagnostic tool for rapid determination of paratuberculosis infection status in small ruminant herds
Pubblicato online: 20 set 2023
Pagine: 347 - 352
Ricevuto: 20 feb 2023
Accettato: 04 lug 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2023-0041
Parole chiave
© 2023 Monika Beinhauerova et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Paratuberculosis, also known as Johne’s disease, is a chronic and fatal inflammatory intestinal disease caused by the slow-growing acid-fast pathogen
One of the key issues that complicates the control of paratuberculosis on farms is the resistant nature of MAP and its ability to survive in the environment for a long time. MAP was found to remain viable after 55 weeks in soil mixed with manure and to persist in the farm environment even after the depopulation of infected herds (23). Studies focusing on the circulation of MAP on farms reported that it could spread through faeces, dust, aerosol or plants (1, 5, 23). Environmental samples are becoming important in the diagnosis of paratuberculosis in pasture-bred cattle and other paratuberculosis-susceptible ruminants. This type of sample is, therefore, among the matrices that are examined in paratuberculosis control and monitoring programmes and represents a reliable indicator of the infection status of herds (7, 25). A standardised protocol for MAP detection based on the cultivation of environmental samples was found to have herd-level sensitivity comparable to those of ELISA and pooled faecal culture (3). In addition, the results of a simulation study suggested that MAP culture of environmental samples was the most cost-effective method for initial classification of the infection status of herds with low, moderate and high MAP prevalence (21).
Although early identification of infected herds is a prerequisite for the control of disease, diagnosis is hampered by the long incubation periods of MAP, variable immune response, the inability of some tests to make live-dead differentiation and the insufficient sensitivity of diagnostic tests, such as cultivation, real-time PCR (qPCR) and ELISA (4). One of the promising new diagnostic approaches, which has the potential to overcome the shortcomings of conventional tests and which provides a quick result, is a technique based on the use of lytic bacteriophage D29 to release mycobacterial DNA, which is subsequently detected and quantified by qPCR (20). A test applying this bacteriophage is currently commercially available under the name Actiphage (PBD Biotech, Birmingham, UK) and in combination with qPCR targeting insertion sequence
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the applicability of the recently developed phage-based assay named Actiphage in combination with IS
Environmental samples (fresh and frozen) were collected on two paratuberculosis-susceptible animal farms with a known history of paratuberculosis. At the time of sampling, one farm numbered 40 sheep in breeding with serum-ELISA and/or IS
Examination of fresh environmental samples for the presence of
Sample no. | Sample characteristics | Direct IS |
Conventional PA (PFU/g)* | Actiphage–IS |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Soil | 5.42 × 102 | 4.80 × 102 | – |
2 | Soil | 1.09 × 102 | 2.18 × 102 | – |
3 | Soil | 1.02 × 102 | 2.88 × 102 | – |
4 | Soil | 4.20 × 102 | – | – |
5 | Cobweb | 1.20 × 102 | – | – |
6 | Soil/plants | 1.64 × 100 | 7.54 × 103 | 1.84 × 100 |
7 | Soil | 5.88 × 100 | 3.06 × 102 | – |
8 | Soil | 6.56 × 100 | 1.09 × 102 | – |
9 | Soil | 2.40 × 100 | 4.36 × 101 | – |
PFU – plaque-forming units; – denotes a negative result;
– plaques occurred during the conventional PA, but MAP was not confirmed by plaque PCR in any of the samples (five plaques per sample were tested)
Examination of frozen environmental samples for the presence of
Sample no. | Sample characteristics | Time frozen | Direct |
Conventional PA (PFU/g)† | Culture* | Actiphage–IS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Soil | 11 years | 6.43 × 103 | 6.98 × 102 | – | – |
2 | Soil | 11 years | 1.18 × 103 | 8.72 × 102 | – | – |
3 | Soil | 11 years | 1.16 × 102 | 2.88 × 103 | – | – |
4 | Soil | 11 years | 2.11 × 102 | 1.92 × 103 | – | – |
5 | Soil | 11 years | 1.30 × 102 | 2.01 × 102 | – | – |
6 | Soil | 11 years | 7.94 × 102 | 2.62 × 102 | – | – |
7 | Soil | 11 years | 3.48 × 102 | 7.85 × 102 | – | – |
8 | Roots | 11 years | 1.07 × 102 | 3.49 × 102 | – | – |
9 | Soil | 11 years | 7.39 × 102 | 2.62 × 102 | – | – |
10 | Roots | 11 years | 1.68 × 102 | 3.49 × 102 | – | – |
11 | Soil | 11 years | 1.61 × 102 | 2.62 × 102 | – | – |
12 | Roots | 11 years | 4.36 × 102 | 6.98 × 102 | – | – |
13 | Roots | 11 years | 6.41 × 102 | 2.27 × 102 | – | – |
14 | Soil | 11 years | 9.81 × 102 | 6.10 × 102 | – | – |
15 | Soil | 11 years | 4.09 × 102 | 1.74 × 102 | – | – |
16 | Roots | 11 years | 1.57 × 102 | 5.58 × 102 | – | – |
17 | Soil | 8 years | 4.40 × 102 | 4.36 × 102 | – | – |
18 | Detritus | 8 years | 1.25 × 102 | 4.36 × 101 | – | – |
19 | Feed residues | 8 years | 1.94 × 102 | – | – | – |
20 | Soil | 11 years | 2.67 × 101 | 8.72 × 101 | – | – |
21 | Soil | 11 years | 7.26 × 101 | 1.13 × 103 | – | – |
22 | Soil | 11 years | 8.93 × 101 | 5.67 × 102 | – | – |
23 | Soil | 11 years | 6.11 × 101 | 3.49 × 103 | – | – |
24 | Soil | 11 years | 7.95 × 101 | 1.74 × 102 | – | – |
25 | Roots | 11 years | 6.44 × 101 | 5.23 × 101 | – | – |
26 | Soil | 11 years | 7.90 × 101 | 8.72 × 100 | – | – |
27 | Soil | 11 years | 2.70 × 101 | 1.40 × 102 | – | – |
28 | Roots | 11 years | 9.91 × 101 | 1.74 × 102 | – | – |
PFU – plaque-forming units; – denotes a negative result;
– the analysis was performed immediately after sample collection;
– plaques occurred during the conventional PA, but MAP was not confirmed by plaque PCR in any of the samples (five plaques per sample were tested)
The processing of environmental samples drew on the method of an earlier study using faecal samples (9). Briefly, 5 g of the total environmental sample was homogenised in 30 mL of sterile distilled water on a vortex and subsequently centrifuged at 100 ×
Culture examination of environmental samples was performed as described previously on Herrold’s egg-yolk medium (HEYM) supplemented with 2 mg/mL Mycobactin J (Allied Monitor, Fayette, MO, USA) after the samples had been decontaminated with hexadecyl pyridinium chloride (N-cetylpyridinium chloride monohydrate; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) (9).
The conventional PA was performed as described earlier (6) with minor modifications. In brief, the pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of Middlebrook 7H9 broth (M7H9; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) supplemented with 10% Middlebrook OADC enrichment (Difco Laboratories), 2 mM CaCl2 (Penta Chemicals, Prague, Czech Republic) and 1.25% PANTA antibiotic mixture (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The antibiotic mixture was prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions and used to suppress the growth of other bacteria present in the samples. Following overnight incubation at 37°C with shaking at 100 rpm, 100 μL of bacteriophage D29 (stock concentration 109 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL) was added and the sample was incubated at 37°C for 2 h with shaking at 100 rpm. Then, 100 μL of 100 mM ferrous ammonium sulphate solution (FAS; Lach-Ner, Neratovice, Czech Republic) was added and the samples were incubated at room temperature for 5 min, followed by FAS neutralisation by the addition of 5 mL of enriched medium and preparation of tenfold serial dilutions of samples. A 1 mL aliquot of
The identity of the mycobacteria detected was analysed by plaque PCR (19) with five plaques per sample being examined. The centre of the plaque was excised using a sterile loop and transferred to 10 μL of ultrapure water (Top-Bio, Vestec, Czech Republic), heated at 95°C until the agar melted, and immediately frozen at -20°C. After 15 min at this temperature, the samples were thawed and the DNA present in the supernatant was analysed by an in-house IS
The extraction of MAP DNA using an Actiphage Rapid Kit (PBD Biotech) was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions, after which it was purified using the PurePhage Kit protocol (BioSellal, Dardilly, France). For frozen environmental samples, before performing the Actiphage-qPCR assay, pellets were resuspended in 1 mL of Actiphage Medium Plus (PBD Biotech), incubated overnight at 37°C and centrifuged at 13,000 ×
Examination of fresh sample no. 5 by direct IS
The detection and quantification of MAP cells by IS
In order to investigate the possibility of detecting other mycobacteria that are naturally prevalent in the environment, two-week-old cultures of
Of the 9 fresh environmental samples, 1 (11.11%) tested positive by Actiphage-qPCR with an estimated viable MAP quantity of 1.84 × 100 cells/g of sample (Table 1). In contrast, conventional PA detected viable mycobacteria in 7 (77.78%) samples examined (including the Actiphage-qPCR–positive sample) with mycobacterial cell quantities ranging from 4.36 × 101 to 7.54 × 103 PFU/g of sample, although none of these samples gave a positive result by plaque PCR. Regarding the direct IS
All 28 samples were found to be positive using direct
Considering that numerous samples produced plaques on an agar plate but without a positive result by plaque PCR, it was concluded that environmental mycobacteria other than MAP were most likely present in these samples. Therefore, in order to verify the susceptibility of other mycobacterial strains to bacteriophage D29 infection and to evaluate the possibility of detecting mycobacteria other than MAP by Actiphage-qPCR assay, pure cultures of
The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of the recently developed Actiphage assay combined with IS
Using Actiphage–IS
Using conventional PA, many fresh and frozen environmental samples produced plaques on an agar plate (with a few cases presenting PFU quantities exceeding the DNA copy number determined by direct qPCR); however, none of them gave a positive result in the plaque PCR (with five plaques tested per sample). Because we did not test all plaques formed on agar plates, there is a certain probability that some plaques formed due to the presence of viable MAP were missed. However, considering the results of other methods providing information on viability (Actiphage-qPCR and culture), it is very likely that viable MAP was not present in these samples and plaques appeared as a result of bacteriophage D29 replication in environmental mycobacteria other than MAP.
Given the likely presence of environmental mycobacteria other than MAP in the specimens tested, another aim was to determine whether these mycobacteria could also be detected using Actiphage-qPCR. For this purpose, cell suspensions of
This is the first demonstration of the use of phage-based assays to detect and quantify viable MAP cells in environmental samples. Actiphage–IS