INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Pubblicato online: 28 ago 2020
Pagine: 427 - 431
Ricevuto: 02 feb 2020
Accettato: 11 ago 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2020-0054
Parole chiave
© 2020 S. Mikołajczyk et al. published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Fig. 1
Sampling points
| Species | Sampling point (province, country) | Number of samples |
|---|---|---|
| eel | Warmian-Masuria, Greater Poland, Kuyavia-Pomerania, Pomerania, West Pomerania | 15 |
| rainbow trout | Lower Silesia, Lublin, Lubuskie, Lesser Poland, Masovia, Opole, Podlasie, Silesia, Warmia-Masuria | 40 |
| bream | West Pomerania, Lesser Poland, Warmia-Masuria, Greater Poland | 18 |
| sturgeon | Lower Silesia, Lublin, Lubuskie, Lesser Poland, Masovia, Opole, Podlasie, Silesian, Warmia-Masuria | 15 |
| carp | Lower Silesia, Lublin, Lubuskie, Lesser Poland, Masovia, Opole, Podlasie, Silesian, Warmia-Masuria | 42 |
| zander | Subcarpathia, Lublin, Warmia-Masuria | 10 |
| panga | Vietnam | 10 |
PCDD/F, DL-PCB and NDL-PCB (x ± SD, range)
| Species | Fat % | pg WHO-TEQg−1 w.w. | ng g−1 w.w. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCDD | PCDF | PCDD/F | DL–PCB | PCDD/F/DL-PCB | NDL-PCB | ||
| eel | 18.63 ± 6.81 | 0.30 ± 0.14 | 0.18 ± 0.07 | 0.48 ± 0.21 | 1.52 ± 0.68 | 2.00 ± 0.85 | 9.98 ± 6.43 |
| 0.17–0.64 | 0.10–0.38 | 0.27–1.02 | 0.71–2.97 | 1.03–3.98 | 2.83–24.94 | ||
| 0.15 ± 0.07 | 0.19 ± 0.1 | 0.33 ± 0.14 | 0.37 ± 0.18 | 0.70 ± 0.23 | 1.53 ± 0.49 | ||
| bream | 4.12 ± 0.8 | 0.09–0.26 | 0.06–0.34 | 0.20–0.58 | 0.20–0.67 | 0.45–1.01 | 0.60–1.96 |
| 0.10 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.27 ± 0.22 | 0.45 ± 0.24 | 1.93 ± 0.55 | ||
| sturgeon | 8.01 ± 4.16 | 0.09–0.14 | 0.05–0.13 | 0.13–0.21 | 0.17–0.67 | 0.31–0.88 | 1.16–2.4 |
| 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.14 ± 0.3 | 0.19 ± 0.4 | 0.33 ± 0.72 | 0.50 ± 1.67 | ||
| carp | 6.01 ± 8.36 | 0.02–0.15 | 0.03–0.15 | 0.02–1.75 | 0.01–2.6 | 0.03–4.35 | 0.11–12.97 |
| rainbow | 0.09 ± 0.0 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.08 | 0.32 ± 0.08 | 1.80 ± 1.34 | |
| trout | 5.51 ± 1.71 | 0.09–0.09 | 0.04–0.07 | 0.03–0.32 | 0.02–0.33 | 0.05–0.47 | 0.05–8.39 |
| panga | 0.01 ± 0.0 | 0.01 ± 0.0 | 0.01 ± 0.0 | 0.01 ± 0.0 | 0.02 ± 0.0 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | |
| 0.93 ± 0.41 | 0.01–0.01 | 0.01–0.01 | 0.01–0.02 | 0.01–0.01 | 0.02–0.02 | 0.05–0.08 | |
| zander | 0.01 ± 0.0 | 0.01 ± 0.0 | 0.01 ± 0.0 | 0.01 ± 0.0 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.50 ± 0.67 | |
| 0.34 ± 0.05 | 0.01–0.01 | 0.01–0.01 | 0.01–0.01 | 0.01–0.02 | 0.02–0.04 | 0.11–2.97 | |
| Maximum | levels (reference 4) | – | – | 3.5 | – | 6.5 | 75 |
Estimated intake of PCDD/F and DL-PCB with 200 g of fish, expressed as % of TWI
| Fish species | Children % TWI | Adult % TWI |
|---|---|---|
| eel | 866 | 286 |
| bream | 303 | 100 |
| sturgeon | 195 | 64 |
| carp | 143 | 47 |
| rainbow trout | 139 | 46 |
| panga | 9 | 3 |
| zander | 13 | 4 |