Login
Registrati
Reimposta password
Pubblica & Distribuisci
Soluzioni Editoriali
Soluzioni di Distribuzione
Temi
Architettura e design
Arti
Business e Economia
Chimica
Chimica industriale
Farmacia
Filosofia
Fisica
Geoscienze
Ingegneria
Interesse generale
Legge
Letteratura
Linguistica e semiotica
Matematica
Medicina
Musica
Scienze bibliotecarie e dell'informazione, studi library
Scienze dei materiali
Scienze della vita
Scienze informatiche
Scienze sociali
Sport e tempo libero
Storia
Studi classici e del Vicino Oriente antico
Studi culturali
Studi ebraici
Teologia e religione
Pubblicazioni
Riviste
Libri
Atti
Editori
Blog
Contatti
Cerca
EUR
USD
GBP
Italiano
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrello
Home
Riviste
Journal of Nematology
Volume 54 (2022): Numero 1 (February 2022)
Accesso libero
Non-fumigant Nematicides are Promising Alternatives to Fumigants for the Management of
Meloidogyne enterolobii
in Tobacco
M. S. Alam
M. S. Alam
,
C. Khanal
C. Khanal
,
W. Rutter
W. Rutter
e
J. Roberts
J. Roberts
| 09 nov 2022
Journal of Nematology
Volume 54 (2022): Numero 1 (February 2022)
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Sommario
Articolo
Immagini e tabelle
Bibliografia
Autori
Articoli in questo Numero
Anteprima
PDF
Cita
CONDIVIDI
Article Category:
Research Paper
Pubblicato online:
09 nov 2022
Pagine:
-
Ricevuto:
11 mag 2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2022-0045
Parole chiave
biological
,
fluensulfone
,
fluopyram
,
management
,
nematicide
,
non-fumigant
,
oxamyl
,
tobacco
© 2022 Alam et al. published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1
Reproduction of Meloidogyne enterolobii expressed as number of eggs per root system of tobacco inoculated with 1,000 freshly hatched second-stage juveniles, treated with non-fumigant nematicides, and harvested at 60 d after inoculation. Data were combined over two experiments and are means of 10 replications. Within columns, means followed by a common letter are not significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test (P ≤ 0.05). Burkholderia refers to Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 secondary metabolites.
Figure 2
Reproduction of Meloidogyne enterolobii expressed as number of second-stage juveniles per 100 cm3 of soil containing tobacco inoculated with 1,000 freshly hatched second-stage juveniles, treated with non-fumigant nematicides, and harvested at 60 d after inoculation. Data were combined over two experiments and are means of 10 replications. Within columns, means followed by a common letter are not significantly different according to Student’s t-test (P ≤ 0.05). Burkholderia refers to Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 secondary metabolites.
Figure 3
Dry weights of tobacco roots 60 d after inoculation with 1,000 freshly hatched second-stage juveniles of Meloidogyne enterolobii and application of non-fumigant nematicides. Data are means of 10 replications. The plant material was dried at 45°C for 2 wk. Bars with common letters are not significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test (P ≤ 0.05).
Non-fumigant chemical and biological nematicide treatments and their recommended application rates used in the current study.
Treatment
Application rate (L/ha)
Oxamyl
4.68
Fluopyram
0.50
Fluensulfone
4.09
Burkholderia
a
18.71
Untreated control
–