[
1. Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Kolodgie FD. Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:C13-18.10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.065
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Overbaugh KJ. Acute Coronary Syndrome. AJN Am J Nurs. 2009;109:42-52.10.1097/01.NAJ.0000351508.39509.e2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Clarke J-RD, Duarte Lau F, Zarich SW. Determining the Significance of Coronary Plaque Lesions: Physiological Stenosis Severity and Plaque Characteristics. J Clin Med. 2020;9:665.10.3390/jcm9030665
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Stefanadis C, Antoniou C, Tsiachris D, Pietri P. Coronary Atherosclerotic Vulnerable Plaque: Current Perspectives. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6 e005543.10.1161/JAHA.117.005543
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Drobni ZD, Kolossváry M, Szilveszter B, Merkely B, Maurovich-Horvat P. A koronária-CT-angiográfia jelentősége a mindennapi gyakorlatban stabil anginás betegek körében. Cardiol Hung. 2018;48:52-57.10.26430/CHUNGARICA.2018.48.1.52
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Crawford T, Levene CI. Medial thinning in atheroma. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1953;66:19-23.10.1002/path.1700660104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins CK, Stankunavicius R, Kolettis GJ. Compensatory Enlargement of Human Atherosclerotic Coronary Arteries. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1371-1375.10.1056/NEJM198705283162204
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Hermiller JB, Tenaglia AN, Kisslo KB, et al. In vivo validation of compensatory enlargement of atherosclerotic coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:665-668.10.1016/0002-9149(93)91007-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Varnava AM, Mills PG, Davies MJ. Relationship Between Coronary Artery Remodeling and Plaque Vulnerability. Circulation. 2002;105:939-943.10.1161/hc0802.10432711864922
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Schoenhagen P, Ziada KM, Kapadia SR, Crowe TD, Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM. Extent and Direction of Arterial Remodeling in Stable Versus Unstable Coronary Syndromes: An Intravascular Ultrasound Study. Circulation. 2000;101:598-603.10.1161/01.CIR.101.6.59810673250
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Nishioka T, Luo H, Eigler NL, Berglund H, Kim C-J, Siegel RJ. Contribution of inadequate compensatory enlargement to development of human coronary artery stenosis: An in vivo intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1571-1576.10.1016/0735-1097(96)00071-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Mintz GS, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Popma JJ, Leon MB. Contribution of Inadequate Arterial Remodeling to the Development of Focal Coronary Artery Stenoses: An Intravascular Ultrasound Study. Circulation. 1997;95:1791-1798.10.1161/01.CIR.95.7.1791
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Hakim D, Abdallah M, Effat M, Al Solaiman F, Alli O, Leesar MA. A new intravascular ultrasound-guided stenting strategy compared with angiography on stent expansion and procedural outcomes in patients with positive lesion remodeling. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;97:237-244.10.1002/ccd.28727
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Galal H, Rashid T, Alghonaimy W, Kamal D. Detection of positively remodeled coronary artery lesions by multislice CT and its impact on cardiovascular future events. Egypt Heart J. 2019;71:26.10.1186/s43044-019-0029-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Reddy S, Rao K R, Kashyap JR, et al. Impact of plaque burden and composition on coronary slow flow in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: intravascular ultrasound and virtual histology analysis. Acta Cardiol. 2020;1-11.10.1080/00015385.2020.1767842
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Rodriguez-Granillo GA. Coronary artery remodelling is related to plaque composition. Heart. 2005;92:388-391.10.1136/hrt.2004.057810
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Inaba S, Mintz GS, Farhat NZ, et al. Impact of Positive and Negative Lesion Site Remodeling on Clinical Outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:70-78.10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.10.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Gussenhoven EJ, Geselschap JH, van Lankeren W, Posthuma DJ, van der Lugt A. Remodeling of Atherosclerotic Coronary Arteries Assessed With Intravascular Ultrasound In Vitro. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:699-702.10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00849-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Nakamura M, Nishikawa H, Mukai S, et al. Impact of coronary artery remodeling on clinical presentation of coronary artery disease: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:63-69.10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01097-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Eckert J, Schmidt M, Magedanz A, Voigtländer T, Schmermund A. Coronary CT Angiography in Managing Atherosclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:3740-3756.10.3390/ijms16023740434692325671814
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Kolodgie FD. Pathology of the Vulnerable Plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:C13-C18.10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.06516631505
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang YH, Smialek J, Virmani R. Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1276-1282.10.1056/NEJM1997050133618029113930
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Gueret P, Deux J-F, Bonello L, et al. Diagnostic Performance of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (from the Prospective National Multicenter Multivendor EVASCAN Study). Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:471-478.10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.10.02923261002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:407-477.10.1093/eurheartj/ehz42531504439
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. The SCOT-HEART Investigators. Coronary CT Angiography and 5-Year Risk of Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:924-933.10.1056/NEJMoa180597130145934
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Hoffmann U, Ferencik M, Udelson JE, et al. Prognostic Value of Noninvasive Cardiovascular Testing in Patients With Stable Chest Pain: Insights From the PROMISE Trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain). Circulation. 2017;135:2320-2332.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024360594605728389572
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Mark DB, Shaw L, Harrell FE, et al. Prognostic Value of a Treadmill Exercise Score in Outpatients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:849-853.10.1056/NEJM1991091932512041875969
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H, et al. Computed Tomographic Angiography Characteristics of Atherosclerotic Plaques Subsequently Resulting in Acute Coronary Syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:49-57.10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.06819555840
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Conte E, Annoni A, Pontone G, et al. Evaluation of coronary plaque characteristics with coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease: a long-term follow-up study. Eur Heart J – Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:1170-1178.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Motoyama S, Ito H, Sarai M, et al. Plaque Characterization by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and the Likelihood of Acute Coronary Events in Mid-Term Follow-Up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:337-346.10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.06926205589
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Han D, Berman DS, Miller RJH, et al. Association of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factor Burden With Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis Assessed by Serial Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e2011444.10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11444738200132706382
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Williams MC, Moss AJ, Dweck M, et al. Coronary Artery Plaque Characteristics Associated With Adverse Outcomes in the SCOT-HEART Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:291-301.10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.066
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Nazir MS, Nicol E. The SCOT-HEART trial: cardiac CT to guide patient management and improve outcomes. Cardiovasc Res. 2019;115:e88-e90.10.1093/cvr/cvz173
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Schoenhagen P, Ziada KM, Vince DG, Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM. Arterial remodeling and coronary artery disease: the concept of “dilated” versus “obstructive” coronary atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:297-306.10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01374-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Serruys PW, Katagiri Y, Sotomi Y, et al. Arterial Remodeling After Bioresorbable Scaffolds and Metallic Stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:60-74.10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.02828662808
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Ono M, Kawashima H, Hara H, et al. Advances in IVUS/OCT and Future Clinical Perspective of Novel Hybrid Catheter System in Coronary Imaging. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020;7:119.10.3389/fcvm.2020.00119741113932850981
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. de Boer S, Baran Y, Garcia-Garcia HM, et al. The European Collaborative Project on Inflammation and Vascular Wall Remodeling in Atherosclerosis - Intravascular Ultrasound (ATHEROREMO-IVUS) study. EuroIntervention. 2018;14:194-203.10.4244/EIJ-D-17-0018028943493
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Cheng JM, Garcia-Garcia HM, de Boer SPM, et al. In vivo detection of high-risk coronary plaques by radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound and cardiovascular outcome: results of the ATHEROREMO-IVUS study. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:639-647.10.1093/eurheartj/eht48424255128
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Yamamoto K, Sakakura K, Akashi N, et al. Association of slow flow with clinical factors in intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with left main trunk-acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiol. 2020;75:53-59.10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.06.00831324571
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Hong YJ, Jeong MH, Choi YH, et al. Positive remodeling is associated with more plaque vulnerability and higher frequency of plaque prolapse accompanied with post-procedural cardiac enzyme elevation compared with intermediate/negative remodeling in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiol. 2009;53:278-287.10.1016/j.jjcc.2008.12.00619304134
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Nakamura T, Kubo N, Ako J, Momomura S-I. Angiographic No-Reflow Phenomenon and Plaque Characteristics by Virtual Histology Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Intervent Cardiol. 2007;20:335-339.10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00282.x17880329
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Li J, Wu L, Tian X, Zhang J, Shi Y. Intravascular Ultrasound Observation of the Mechanism of No-Reflow Phenomenon in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Zhang Z, ed. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0119223.10.1371/journal.pone.0119223
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Nissen SE, Gurley JC, Grines CL, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of lumen size and wall morphology in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1991;84:1087-1099.10.1161/01.CIR.84.3.1087
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Ali ZA, Maehara A, Généreux P, et al. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2016;388:2618-2628.10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31922-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Xu J, Lo S. Fundamentals and role of intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020;10:1358-1370.10.21037/cdt.2020.01.15766693333224762
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Bec J, Phipps JE, Gorpas D, et al. In vivo label-free structural and biochemical imaging of coronary arteries using an integrated ultrasound and multispectral fluorescence lifetime catheter system. Sci Rep. 2017;7:8960.10.1038/s41598-017-08056-0556654628827758
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Reddy S, Kadiyala V, Kashyap JR, et al. Comparison of Intravascular Ultrasound Virtual Histology Parameters in Diabetes versus Non-Diabetes with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Cardiology. 2020;145:570-577.10.1159/00050888632726774
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Jensen LO, Thayssen P, Mintz GS, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of remodelling and reference segment plaque burden in type-2 diabetic patients. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1759-1764.10.1093/eurheartj/ehm17517540850
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Nicholls SJ, Tuzcu EM, Kalidindi S, et al. Effect of Diabetes on Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis and Arterial Remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:255-262.10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.05118634979
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Du R, Zhang RY, Lu L, et al. Increased glycated albumin and decreased esRAGE levels in serum are related to negative coronary artery remodeling in patients with type 2 diabetes: an Intravascular ultrasound study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17:149.10.1186/s12933-018-0792-y625843830482197
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Kim S-H, Moon J-Y, Lim YM, et al. Association of insulin resistance and coronary artery remodeling: an intravascular ultrasound study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:74.10.1186/s12933-015-0238-8447260926047939
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Liu J, Wang S, Cui C, et al. The association between glucose-related variables and plaque morphology in patients with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19:109.10.1186/s12933-020-01074-9734163632641042
]Search in Google Scholar