This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ahuja, G., (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.AhujaG. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.Search in Google Scholar
Alcácer, J., & Gittelman, M., (2006). Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 774-779.AlcácerJ.GittelmanM. (2006). Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 774-779.Search in Google Scholar
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.Search in Google Scholar
Bellamy, M. A., Ghosh, S., & Hora, M. (2014). The influence of supply network structure on firm innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 32(6), 357-373.BellamyM. A.GhoshS.HoraM. (2014). The influence of supply network structure on firm innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 32(6), 357-373.Search in Google Scholar
Broekel, T., Brenner, T., & Buerger, M. (2015). An investigation of the relation between cooperation intensity and the innovative success of German regions. Spatial Economic Analysis, 10(1), 52-78.BroekelT.BrennerT.BuergerM. (2015). An investigation of the relation between cooperation intensity and the innovative success of German regions. Spatial Economic Analysis, 10(1), 52-78.Search in Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.BurtR. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cammarano, A., Michelino, F., & Lamberti, E. (2017). Accumulated stock of knowledge and current search practices: The impact on patent quality. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, 204-222.CammaranoA.MichelinoF.LambertiE. (2017). Accumulated stock of knowledge and current search practices: The impact on patent quality. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, 204-222.Search in Google Scholar
Casanueva, C., Castro, I., & Galan, J. L. (2013). Informational networks and innovation in mature industrial clusters. Journal of Business Research, 66(5), 603-613.CasanuevaC.CastroI.GalanJ. L. (2013). Informational networks and innovation in mature industrial clusters. Journal of Business Research, 66(5), 603-613.Search in Google Scholar
Chakravarty, A., Zhou, C., & Sharma, A. (2020). Effect of Alliance Network Asymmetry on Firm Performance and Risk. Journal of Marketing, 84(6), 74-94.ChakravartyA.ZhouC.SharmaA. (2020). Effect of Alliance Network Asymmetry on Firm Performance and Risk. Journal of Marketing, 84(6), 74-94.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, H., Xu, X. J., Li, Z. Z., & Zhang, Z. Y. (2022). The synergy of inventor cooperative network dual embeddedness and firm innovation: The mediating role of ambidextrous learning. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(1), 89-104.ChengH.XuX. J.LiZ. Z.ZhangZ. Y. (2022). The synergy of inventor cooperative network dual embeddedness and firm innovation: The mediating role of ambidextrous learning. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(1), 89-104.Search in Google Scholar
Chuluun, T., Prevost, A., & Upadhyay, A. (2017). Firm network structure and innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 44, 193-214.ChuluunT.PrevostA.UpadhyayA. (2017). Firm network structure and innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 44, 193-214.Search in Google Scholar
Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.ColemanJ. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.Search in Google Scholar
Cong, H. B., Zou, D. L., & Wu, F. X. (2017). Influence mechanism of multi-network embeddedness to enterprises innovation performance based on knowledge management perspective. Cluster Computing-the Journal of Networks Software Tools and Applications, 20(1), 93-108.CongH. B.ZouD. L.WuF. X. (2017). Influence mechanism of multi-network embeddedness to enterprises innovation performance based on knowledge management perspective. Cluster Computing-the Journal of Networks Software Tools and Applications, 20(1), 93-108.Search in Google Scholar
de Leeuw, T., Lokshin, B., & Duysters, G. (2014). Returns to alliance portfolio diversity: The relative effects of partner diversity on firm’s innovative performance and productivity. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1839-1849.de LeeuwT.LokshinB.DuystersG. (2014). Returns to alliance portfolio diversity: The relative effects of partner diversity on firm’s innovative performance and productivity. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1839-1849.Search in Google Scholar
Dong, J. Q., McCarthy, K. J., & Schoenmakers, W. (2017). How central is too central? Organizing interorganizational collaboration networks for breakthrough innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(4), 526542.DongJ. Q.McCarthyK. J.SchoenmakersW. (2017). How central is too central? Organizing interorganizational collaboration networks for breakthrough innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(4), 526-542.Search in Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C., (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Network, 1(3), 215-239.FreemanL. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Network, 1(3), 215-239.Search in Google Scholar
Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptations of social capital. Organization Science, 11(2), 183-196.GargiuloM.BenassiM. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptations of social capital. Organization Science, 11(2), 183-196.Search in Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.Search in Google Scholar
Grimaldi, M., & Cricelli, L. (2020). Indexes of patent value: A systematic literature review and classification. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(2), 214-233.GrimaldiM.CricelliL. (2020). Indexes of patent value: A systematic literature review and classification. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(2), 214-233.Search in Google Scholar
Guan, J. C., Zhang, J. J., & Yan, Y. (2015). The impact of multilevel networks on innovation. Research Policy, 44(3), 545-559.GuanJ. C.ZhangJ. J.YanY. (2015). The impact of multilevel networks on innovation. Research Policy, 44(3), 545-559.Search in Google Scholar
Han, S. J., Lyu, Y. B., Ji, R. N., Zhu, Y. Q., Su, J. Q., & Bao, L. N. (2020). Open innovation, network embeddedness and incremental innovation capability. Management Decision, 58(12), 2655-2680.HanS. J.LyuY. B.JiR. N.ZhuY. Q.SuJ. Q.BaoL. N. (2020). Open innovation, network embeddedness and incremental innovation capability. Management Decision, 58(12), 2655-2680.Search in Google Scholar
Huang, H. S., Zhang, J. P., Yan, J., Gong, Y., & Wang, L. K. (2022). Supply chain network structure and firm’s R&D investments: Empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(2), 551-571.HuangH. S.ZhangJ. P.YanJ.GongY.WangL. K. (2022). Supply chain network structure and firm’s R&D investments: Empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(2), 551-571.Search in Google Scholar
Huggins, R., & Thompson, P. (2017). Entrepreneurial networks and open innovation: The role of strategic and embedded ties. Industry and Innovation, 24(4), 403-435.HugginsR.ThompsonP. (2017). Entrepreneurial networks and open innovation: The role of strategic and embedded ties. Industry and Innovation, 24(4), 403-435.Search in Google Scholar
Jacob, J., & Duysters, G. (2017). Alliance network configurations and the co-evolution of firms’ technology profiles: An analysis of the biopharmaceutical industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, 90-102.JacobJ.DuystersG. (2017). Alliance network configurations and the co-evolution of firms’ technology profiles: An analysis of the biopharmaceutical industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, 90-102.Search in Google Scholar
Jiang, H., Xia, J., Cannella, A. A., & Xiao, T. (2018). Do ongoing networks block out new friends? Reconciling the embeddedness constraint dilemma on new alliance partner addition. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1): 217-241.JiangH.XiaJ.CannellaA. A.XiaoT. (2018). Do ongoing networks block out new friends? Reconciling the embeddedness constraint dilemma on new alliance partner addition. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1): 217-241.Search in Google Scholar
Jin, Y., & Shao, Y. F. (2022). Power-leveraging paradox and firm innovation: The influence of network power, knowledge integration and breakthrough innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 102, 205-215.JinY.ShaoY. F. (2022). Power-leveraging paradox and firm innovation: The influence of network power, knowledge integration and breakthrough innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 102, 205-215.Search in Google Scholar
Kohtamaki, M., Heimonen, J., Sjodin, D., & Heikkila, V. (2020). Strategic agility in innovation: Unpacking the interaction between entrepreneurial orientation and absorptive capacity by using practice theory. Journal of Business Research, 118, 12-25.KohtamakiM.HeimonenJ.SjodinD.HeikkilaV. (2020). Strategic agility in innovation: Unpacking the interaction between entrepreneurial orientation and absorptive capacity by using practice theory. Journal of Business Research, 118, 12-25.Search in Google Scholar
Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638-658.LavieD. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638-658.Search in Google Scholar
Li, Y., Wang, X., Chen, C., Jing, C., & Wu, T. (2020). Exploring firms’ innovation capabilities through learning systems. Neurocomputing, 409, 27-34. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.03.100LiY.WangX.ChenC.JingC.WuT. (2020). Exploring firms’ innovation capabilities through learning systems. Neurocomputing, 409, 27-34. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.03.100Search in Google Scholar
Morandi, V. (2013). The management of industry-university joint research projects: How do partners coordinate and control R&D activities? Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(2), 69-92.MorandiV. (2013). The management of industry-university joint research projects: How do partners coordinate and control R&D activities?Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(2), 69-92.Search in Google Scholar
Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5-21.Owen-SmithJ.PowellW. W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5-21.Search in Google Scholar
Park, B. J., Srivastava, M. K., & Gnyawali, D. R. (2014). Walking the tight rope of coopetition: Impact of competition and cooperation intensities and balance on firm innovation performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 210-221.ParkB. J.SrivastavaM. K.GnyawaliD. R. (2014). Walking the tight rope of coopetition: Impact of competition and cooperation intensities and balance on firm innovation performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 210-221.Search in Google Scholar
Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y., & Siokas, E. (2013). Twenty-five years of science-industry collaboration: The emergence and evolution of policy-driven research networks across Europe. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(6), 873-895.ProtogerouA.CaloghirouY.SiokasE. (2013). Twenty-five years of science-industry collaboration: The emergence and evolution of policy-driven research networks across Europe. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(6), 873-895.Search in Google Scholar
Reck, F., & Fliaster, A. (2024). Far-reaching or closely knit, innovative or complementary? Network configurations and firm-level innovation in the German energy sector. Strategic Organization, 22(4), 668-698.ReckF.FliasterA. (2024). Far-reaching or closely knit, innovative or complementary? Network configurations and firm-level innovation in the German energy sector. Strategic Organization, 22(4), 668-698.Search in Google Scholar
Reck, F., Fliaster, A., & Kolloch, M. (2022). How to build a network that facilitates firm-level innovation: An integration of structural and managerial perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 59(4), 998-1031.ReckF.FliasterA.KollochM. (2022). How to build a network that facilitates firm-level innovation: An integration of structural and managerial perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 59(4), 998-1031.Search in Google Scholar
Schilling, M.A., & Phelps, C.C. (2007). Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science, 53(7), 1113-1126.SchillingM.A.PhelpsC.C. (2007). Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science, 53(7), 1113-1126.Search in Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305.TeeceD. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305.Search in Google Scholar
Thomaz, F., & Swaminathan, V. (2015). What Goes Around Comes Around: The Impact of Marketing Alliances on Firm Risk and the Moderating Role of Network Density. Journal of Marketing 79(5), 63-79.ThomazF.SwaminathanV. (2015). What Goes Around Comes Around: The Impact of Marketing Alliances on Firm Risk and the Moderating Role of Network Density. Journal of Marketing79(5), 63-79.Search in Google Scholar
Tian, M. Y., Su, Y. W., & Yang, Z. (2022). University-industry collaboration and firm innovation: An empirical study of the biopharmaceutical industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(5), 1488-1505.TianM. Y.SuY. W.YangZ. (2022). University-industry collaboration and firm innovation: An empirical study of the biopharmaceutical industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(5), 1488-1505.Search in Google Scholar
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67.UzziB. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, M. C., Chen, P. C., & Fang, S. C. (2018). A critical view of knowledge networks and innovation performance: The mediation role of firms’ knowledge integration capability. Journal of Business Research, 88, 222-233.WangM. C.ChenP. C.FangS. C. (2018). A critical view of knowledge networks and innovation performance: The mediation role of firms’ knowledge integration capability. Journal of Business Research, 88, 222-233.Search in Google Scholar
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Xie, X. M., Fang, L. X., & Zeng, S. X. (2016). Collaborative innovation network and knowledge transfer performance: A fsQCA approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5210-5215.XieX. M.FangL. X.ZengS. X. (2016). Collaborative innovation network and knowledge transfer performance: A fsQCA approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5210-5215.Search in Google Scholar
Yan, Y., Zhang, J. J., & Guan, J. C. (2020). Network embeddedness and innovation: Evidence from the alternative energy field. Ieee Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(3), 769-782.YanY.ZhangJ. J.GuanJ. C. (2020). Network embeddedness and innovation: Evidence from the alternative energy field. Ieee Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(3), 769-782.Search in Google Scholar
Yao, Y. H., Gao, H., & Sun, F. Q. (2020). The impact of dual network structure on firm performance: The moderating effect of innovation strategy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(9), 1020-1034.YaoY. H.GaoH.SunF. Q. (2020). The impact of dual network structure on firm performance: The moderating effect of innovation strategy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(9), 1020-1034.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, J. M., Jiang, H., Wu, R., & Li, J. Z. (2019). Reconciling the dilemma of knowledge sharing: A network pluralism framework of firms’ R&D alliance network and innovation performance. Journal of Management, 45(7), 2635-2665.ZhangJ. M.JiangH.WuR.LiJ. Z. (2019). Reconciling the dilemma of knowledge sharing: A network pluralism framework of firms’ R&D alliance network and innovation performance. Journal of Management, 45(7), 2635-2665.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Qian, Y., & Huang, Y. (2017). An entropy-based indicator system for measuring the potential of patents in technological innovation: Rejecting moderation. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1925-1946.ZhangY.QianY.HuangY. (2017). An entropy-based indicator system for measuring the potential of patents in technological innovation: Rejecting moderation. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1925-1946.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. W., & Zhou, W. H. (2024). How does network intermediary affect collaborative innovation? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Journal of Data and Information Science, 9(4), 49-70.ZhangZ. W.ZhouW. H. (2024). How does network intermediary affect collaborative innovation? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Journal of Data and Information Science, 9(4), 49-70.Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, J. Y., Wei, J., Xi, X., & Wang, S. S. (2020). Firms’ heterogeneity, relationship embeddedness, and innovation development in competitive alliances. Industrial Marketing Management, 91, 114-128.ZhaoJ. Y.WeiJ.XiX.WangS. S. (2020). Firms’ heterogeneity, relationship embeddedness, and innovation development in competitive alliances. Industrial Marketing Management, 91, 114-128.Search in Google Scholar
Zhou, W. H., & Li, H. L. (2023). A study on the multidimensional driving mechanism of cross-regional scientific collaboration network in China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(11), 3667-3681.ZhouW. H.LiH. L. (2023). A study on the multidimensional driving mechanism of cross-regional scientific collaboration network in China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(11), 3667-3681.Search in Google Scholar
Zhou, W. H. & Li, H. L. (2024). R&D team network configurations, knowledge diversity and breakthrough innovation: A combined effect framework. European Journal of Innovation Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2023-1004ZhouW. H.LiH. L. (2024). R&D team network configurations, knowledge diversity and breakthrough innovation: A combined effect framework. European Journal of Innovation Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2023-1004Search in Google Scholar