This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Alexi, A., Lazebnik, T., & Rosenfeld, A. (2024). The scientometrics and reciprocality underlying co-authorship panels in Google Scholar profiles. Scientometrics, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05026-yAlexiA.LazebnikT.RosenfeldA. (2024). The scientometrics and reciprocality underlying co-authorship panels in Google Scholar profiles. , 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05026-ySearch in Google Scholar
Bhattacharjee, A., Kumarage, T., Moraffah, R., & Liu, H. (2023). Conda: Contrastive domain adaptation for AI-generated text detection. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 3rd Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 598–610). Association for Computational Linguistics.BhattacharjeeA.KumarageT.MoraffahR.LiuH. (2023). Conda: Contrastive domain adaptation for AI-generated text detection. In (pp. 598–610). Association for Computational Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. Technology in Society, 75, 102370.Bin-NashwanS. A.SadallahM.BouteraaM. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. , 75, 102370.Search in Google Scholar
Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Ben Saad, H. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615–622.DergaaI.ChamariK.ZmijewskiP.Ben SaadH. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. , 40(2), 615–622.Search in Google Scholar
Draxler, F., Werner, A., Lehmann, F., Hoppe, M., Schmidt, A., Buschek, D., & Welsch, R. (2023). The AI ghostwriter effect: When users do not perceive ownership of AI-generated text but self-declare as authors. arXiv:2303.03283DraxlerF.WernerA.LehmannF.HoppeM.SchmidtA.BuschekD.WelschR. (2023). The AI ghostwriter effect: When users do not perceive ownership of AI-generated text but self-declare as authors. Search in Google Scholar
Editorial. (2023). Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature, 613.Editorial. (2023). Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. , 613.Search in Google Scholar
Lazebnik, T., & Rosenfeld, A. (2023). A computational model for individual scholars’ writing style dynamics. arXiv:2305.04900LazebnikT.RosenfeldA. (2023). A computational model for individual scholars’ writing style dynamics. Search in Google Scholar
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26–29.LundB. D.WangT. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?, 40(3), 26–29.Search in Google Scholar
Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare, 11(6), 887.SallamM. (2023). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. , 11(6), 887.Search in Google Scholar
Seßler, K., Xiang, T., Bogenrieder, L., & Kasneci, E. (2023). Peer: Empowering writing with large language models. In O. Viberg, I. Jivet, P. Muñoz-Merino, M. Perifanou, & T. Papathoma (Eds.), Responsive and sustainable educational futures (pp. 755–761). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14200. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42682-7_73SeßlerK.XiangT.BogenriederL.KasneciE. (2023). Peer: Empowering writing with large language models. In O.VibergI.JivetP.Muñoz-MerinoM.PerifanouT.Papathoma (Eds.), (pp. 755–761). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14200. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42682-7_73Search in Google Scholar
Semrl, N., Feigl, S., Taumberger, N., Bracic, T., Fluhr, H., Blockeel, C., & Kollmann, M. (2023). AI language models in human reproduction research: Exploring ChatGPT’s potential to assist academic writing. Human Reproduction, 38(12), 2281–2288.SemrlN.FeiglS.TaumbergerN.BracicT.FluhrH.BlockeelC.KollmannM. (2023). AI language models in human reproduction research: Exploring ChatGPT’s potential to assist academic writing. , 38(12), 2281–2288.Search in Google Scholar
Sikes, P. (2009). Will the real author come forward? Questions of ethics, plagiarism, theft and collusion in academic research writing. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 13–24.SikesP. (2009). Will the real author come forward? Questions of ethics, plagiarism, theft and collusion in academic research writing. , 32(1), 13–24.Search in Google Scholar
Su, J., Zhuo, T. Y., Wang, D., & Nakov, P. (2023). DetectLLM: Leveraging log rank information for zero-shot detection of machine-generated text. arXiv:2306.05540SuJ.ZhuoT. Y.WangD.NakovP. (2023). DetectLLM: Leveraging log rank information for zero-shot detection of machine-generated text. Search in Google Scholar
Tang, R., Chuang, Y.-N., & Hu, X. (2023). The science of detecting LLM-generated texts. arXiv:2303.07205TangR.ChuangY.-N.HuX. (2023). The science of detecting LLM-generated texts. Search in Google Scholar
Wu, K., Pang, L., Shen, H., Cheng, X., & Chua, T.-S. (2023). LLMDet: A third party large language models generated text detection tool. In H. Bouamor, J. Pino, & K. Bali (Eds.), Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 (pp. 2113–2133). Association for Computational Linguistics.WuK.PangL.ShenH.ChengX.ChuaT.-S. (2023). LLMDet: A third party large language models generated text detection tool. In H.BouamorJ.PinoK.Bali (Eds.), (pp. 2113–2133). Association for Computational Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Yuan, A., Coenen, A., Reif, E., & Ippolito, D. (2022). Wordcraft: Story writing with large language models. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ′22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 841–852. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490099.3511105YuanA.CoenenA.ReifE.IppolitoD. (2022). Wordcraft: Story writing with large language models. In . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 841–852. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490099.3511105Search in Google Scholar
Zargari, H., Rosenfeld, A., & Elmalech, A. (2023). Online self-presentation: Examining gender differences in academic scholars’ personal web-pages. In Proceedings of iConference 2023.ZargariH.RosenfeldA.ElmalechA. (2023). Online self-presentation: Examining gender differences in academic scholars’ personal web-pages. In .Search in Google Scholar